Храм знаний: » Рыночная экономика

Дата: 21.05.2016

The contents

“The People, who have never systematically learned the economic theory,
are similar to deaf persons, which try to estimate sounding an orchestra ”.
P. Samulson

There are fields of knowledge and vital experience, about which, it
seems any of us can judge. Except for politics, to such spheres concern
medicine and, certainly, economy. It is not casual, you see economy –
science is empirical, it connection with practice is direct. Each of us,
irrespective of preparation, collides daily with the economic phenomena. We
are all workers — create values or we raise the qualification, we receive
the incomes, we address to the market, we watch (keep up) the prices, we
are the consumers. The economy studies “homo economics” — economic man, his
actions and interests. Well as in medicine, where for statement of the
diagnosis it is necessary to know the functioning of a healthy organism,
first of all to understand the laws of functioning of healthy economy.
The economic science is called to define how to use the limited
resources maximum effectively — natural stocks, capitals, labour reserves.
Like other branches of knowledge, the economy includes a set of axioms and
proofs, suitable for the analysis in any concrete conditions. And in this
narrow sense it can not be national, as well as there can not be a American
physics or German mathematics. The prices of the goods everywhere are
defined by a parity of a supply and demand, with the growth of the income
there is a reduction of its consumed part and increase gathering.
But the economy has basic difference from exact and natural sciences:
it has business not with the separate man on a uninhabited island, but with
the member of a society subject to influence of traditions, national
mentality and political institutes. The toolkit of the economist has
therefore national specificity.

The science is formed approximately the same as the tree grows or the
building is constructed. The great economists of the past have put in pawn
the base, have created the theory named as microeconomy. As initial item
for the analysis a facilities of the businessman and farmer were taken. The
microeconomy studies the relation between the businessmen (competition),
businessmen and hired workers, sellers and buyers. It formulates the laws:
supplies and demand, rarity-decreasing income, limiting productivity of
work or capital. The microeconomy is directly connected to enterprise
activity, at the same time being a management for business.

The economic theory created in 18 — 19 centuries is named classical, it
answered requirements of development of an industrial society based on a
private property and freedom of an economic choice. The creativity of
ingenious Adam Smite for economy is compared to the invention of a wheel.

Gradually national economy is turning to complex systems of branches
forming a global economy. Periodically repeating economic crisises, chronic
— unemployment and inflation become a rule.

Business practice includes problems, which are not solved through
traditional means. The economists begin to be interested in questions of
general balance, cumulative demand, money manipulation.

The 20 centuries appeared to be a stage of macroeconomy. The large
system is not only set of small subsystems — firms and branches, but also a
new quality. Its actions are operated by other mechanisms. Macrosystem can
not be described by categories of microsystem (price, profit, competition
etc.). New techniques and tools here are necessary.

The Macroeconomic analysis becomes a basis of state politics, development
of the programs, selective (“dot”) methods of influence. But macroeconomic
is knowledge that works not far from business. You see such formulas, as
the return dependence between inflation and unemployment in scale of a
society, or between bank percent and rates of growth of a total product,
between growth of inflation and downturn of the exchange rate of domestic
currency is necessary to know, even to expect changes of a conjuncture and
probable general idea of government, direction of state regulation of
economy.

“ Most of all laws were created in vague times of republic… ”

The state regulation of economy has a long history. The practice here
outstrips the theory. During early capitalism in Europe there was a
centralised control above the prices, quality of the goods and services,
interest rates and foreign trade.

17 century – is a century of the pioneers of the normative economic
theory — wrote that only detailed management on the part of government is
capable to supply the order in economic sphere. They saw in a state
management a means of ensuring social validity.

With transition to capitalism and appearing of free competition, many
aspects of “pioneers” theory were destroyed. The approach of people who
based a classical economy (18 centuries), limiting state intervention in
economic life, has the historical explanation. You see in that period
economy was ruled by the market and freedom of a choice. In economic sense
freedom assumes two main components: the right, to a private property
protected by the law and independence of acceptance of the decisions. In 18
— 19 centuries the economic role of the state was reduced, basically, to
protection of these primary rights. The XX century was market by almost
universal strengthening of economic presence of the state.

From the second half of 19 century national manufacture has achieved
unprecedented scales. The end of the century is connected with explosion,
jump in scientific — technical development and appearance of new branches.
All these circumstance needed requirement for co-ordination, for
maintenance of proportions on macro-level, for anticyclic regulation.

The amplification of state regulation was dictated by the purposes of
preparation to wars, their conducting, maintenance of war-protection. The
whole system of measures including compulsory movements system (GERMANY),
protectionism (Japan) was developed. The army-industrial complexes closely
connected to government were formed.

The state regulation of economy was necessary for realisation of social
politics, for general strategy socialisation in a broad sense. Collective
consumption or satisfaction of public requirements (public health services,
education, support deprived and others) are impossible without use of state
levers and organisations.

And, at last, it would be desirable to emphasise, meaning day today's,
need for state support and sometimes organisations of fundamental
scientific researches, and also protection of environment.

The state regulation, thus, is caused by occurrence of new economic
needs, with which the market on the nature can not consult.

And, though the similar regulation in modern market economy is carried
out in much smaller scales, than in administrative — command system,
nevertheless here economic role of the state is great, is special in
comparison with the system of a free competition.

The state regulation of economy in conditions of a market economy
represents system of typical measures of legislative, executive and
supervising character which is carried out by competent official bodies and
public organisations with the purposes of stabilisation and the adaptation
existing socially — of economic system, and conditions.

In the process of development of a market economy the economic and
social problems became aggravated, they could not be solved automatically
on the basis of a private property. The necessity of the significant
investments, has appeared necessary for continuation of reproduction in
national scales; branch and social crises, mass unemployment, the
infringements in the money manipulation become aggravated competition in
the global markets required state economic politics.

Theoretically concept state economic wider than concept of state
regulation of economy, as first can be based on a principle of non-
interference of the state in economic life (known principle of economic
liberalism laisser faire — laisser passer). In modern conditions the non-
interference of the state in socially — economic processes is impossible.
Disputes about necessity of state regulation of economy, and about its
scales, forms and intensity are conducted for a long time. Therefore terms
“ state regulation of economy ” and “ state economic politics ” are
presently identical.

The objective opportunity of state regulation occurs with the
achievement of the certain level of economic development, concentration of
manufacture and capital. The necessity of transforming this opportunity
into the validity consists in increase of problems, difficulties.

In modern conditions the state regulation of economy is a component of
reproduction. It solves various tasks: for example, stimulation of economic
growth, regulation of employment, encouragement of progressive shifts in
branch and regional structure, support of export. The concrete directions,
forms, scales of state regulation of economy are defined by character and
acuteness of economic and social problems in this or that country in the
concrete period.

For understanding of the mechanism of state regulation of economy it is
expedient to characterise its subjects, objects, purposes, means, and also
stages of its development.

The subjects of economic politics are the carriers and executors of
economic interests.

The carriers of economic interests are social groups distinguished from
each other on a number of attributes: property, the incomes, on kinds of
activity at the similar incomes, on trades, branch and regional interests.
They are hired workers and owners of the enterprises, farmers and land
proprietors, businessmen managers and the shareholders, civil servants etc.
Each of these groups has interests caused by their social economic rule,
and also accessory to that or other region, kind of activity.

The representatives of these groups individually express the interests
in mass media, on meetings and addressing with the requests, protests,
wishes to official bodies responsible for economic and social politics.

It is the first communication line of economic interests with the state
device regulating an economy.

The carriers of economic interests are incorporated in the advanced
countries of a market economy in numerous unions, association: it is trade
unions, unions of the businessmen, farmers, various dealers, students,
brokers and т. Item. Some of these unions total millions members (trade
unions, for example), others play a huge role in a national economy because
of the capitals, represented by them, (unions of the businessmen, bank
establishments, trade chambers). There are also absolutely insignificant
associations, for example, association of the physical and legal persons
interested in a privatisation of the concrete ground area, belonging to
municipality. Such associations are expressers of economic interests.

Most powerful expressers of economic interests are unions of the
businessmen and trade unions. They carry out the own concepts of social
economic politics, aspiring to render the maximal influence on state
economic politics. At expressers of economic interests there are printed
editions, significant financial resources, centres of training of personnel
and public relations. The unions of the businessmen and trade unions are
constructed to a branch and territorial attribute, all local and branch
unions hierarchically are subordinated to the national centres, which, in
turn, enter into the international, regional and global associations.

The recommendations, advises, memorandums, various channels of
influence these expressers of economic interests on bodies of state
economic regulation is the second communication line of economic interests
with state economic politics.

Expressers of social economic, political, religious, cultural,
ecological, specific regional interests are the political parties, which
frequently work under a banner of national interests.

To carry out in life the program of state economic politics there will
be a subject of state economic regulation — executors of economic
interests. It is the main, third line of transformation of private-
individual economic interests in state economic politics.

The executors of economic interests — subjects of state regulation of
economy — are the bodies of three branches of authorities constructed by a
hierarchical principal, and also central national bank. The tendency of
amplification of a role of the central bodies of authority among the
subjects of state economic regulation is appreciable more and more
independent becomes the executive bodies.

Interesting from the point of view of study of the mechanism of state
regulation of economy the merge of the subjects of state and private
economic politics and occurrence is as a result of it of new regulating
bodies which are not entered theoretically in the classical circuit of
parliamentary or presidential republic. For example, the body from the
representatives of unions of the businessmen, trade unions and executive
authority for regulation of the tariff agreements between the businessmen
and workers are created. The committees, advice on maintenance or
development of separate branches from the representatives of the ministry
of economy and branch unions of the businessmen are organised. Similar
advice is created for realisation of the state regional programs. The basic
part of such bodies formally carries out advisory activity, but actually
decisive image influence state economic politics. Various advice of the
experts concerns to such bodies at government, ministries of economy,
finance, social maintenance, their separate management, central bank,
governments of state iron roads, mail and telegraph etc.

Other group of government-private regulation of economy is advice on
spheres of activity, for example, scientific and technical, army-
industrial, on regional politics, on internal waterways of the messages, on
vocational training. As against branch advice in them the representatives
of the most different branches, banks, various funds, associations of the
engineers, trade unions, public movements enter alongside with the
employees of governmental bodies and experts. Their recommendations concern
the basic orientation of state economic politics, its directions of an
expenditure of means from the budget and various funds.

It is the fourth communication line between carriers of economic
interests and state regulation of economy: carriers (in this case
interested firms) – expressers (unions of the businessmen) – advice at
state regulating bodies. On this line there is an updating of interests of
a private enterprise to interest others social, professional, public (for
example, ecological) groups.

There are numerous opportunities of influence of carriers and
expressers of economic interests on state economic politics: through bodies
of the mass information, demonstration and manifestation, tax of the
signatures, manipulation in courts — from local up to international,
campaign of civil disobedience.

Feedback between state regulation of economy and carriers of economic
interests rather rigid.

First, the success of state regulation of economy is shown in rates of
growth, improvement of structure of economy, growth of employment, healthy
payment balance, decrease of rates of inflation, increase of a vital level.

Secondly, the successes of state regulation of economy are reflected in
parameters which are not always given in to exact quantitative measurement:
in a level of social intensity (strike, demonstrations, various
performances), estimation of state regulation of economy by mass media,
condition of an environment, quality of life in cities.

Thirdly, carriers of economic interests are direct and through the
associations supported or do not support government. The loss of trust of
the voters and associations of economic interests to a ruling party or
parties is a main line of a feedback between state economic politics and
carriers of economic interests.

The bodies of state regulation of economy can not afford to find out
reaction of carriers of economic interests to a general orientation and
concrete measures of state economic politics during choices, to wait, when
the discontent by an economic situation starts. The extreme forms (strike,
flight of the capital). The operative information, whenever possible
authentic forecasts the behaviour of the economic subjects is necessary to
governmental bodies in case of realisation of this or that measure of state
regulation of economy. For this purpose there is a fulfilled mechanism as
biographical interrogations. Through a biographical method the efficiency
of toolkit budget, a special way of regulation, influence of state
purchases and orders, investments in public sector are investigated. This
method has turned out to be the working tool of state regulation of economy
ensuring a feedback between regulating bodies and carriers of economic
interests.

So, it was the ideal picture of dependence of state regulation of
economy from economic interests, mechanism of this dependence and feedback.
In real life weight of rejections from model — is observed there is a
struggle between separate groups of interests for influence on bodies of
regulation, a wide circulation has received these method, the facts of
corruption in bodies of state economic politics in the various countries
are known. But the mechanism of state regulation of economy functions all
the same not on rejections, but by rules.

The objects of state regulation of economy are spheres, branches,
regions, and also situations, phenomenon and condition of social economic
life of the country, where have arisen or there can be difficulties,
problems not permitted automatically or permitted in a long-term future,
while the removal of these problems urgently is necessary for normal
functioning of economy and maintenance of social stability.

The basic objects of state regulation of economy is:

1. Business cycle;
2. Sectors, branch and regional structure of a economy;
3. Conditions of accumulation of the capital;
4. Employment;
5. The money reference(manipulation);
6. Payment balance;
7. The prices
8. Research also is skilled — design works having by the purpose
development and realisation of scientific ideas;
9. Conditions of a competition;
10. The social attitudes(relations), including the attitudes(relation)
between the employers and working on hiring, and also social
maintenance;
11. Preparation and retraining of the staff;
12. Environment;
13. Foreign economic relations.
Obviously, the transferred objects can carry completely various
character, they cover macroeconomic processes — economic cycle,
accumulation of the capital in scales of the country, separate branches,
territorial complexes and even the relation between the subjects – the
condition of a competition, the relations between trade unions and
associations of the businessmen, between state regulating bodies.

Let's consider major of them.

The essence of state anticyclic politics, or regulation of an economic
conjuncture, is, that during crises and depressions should stimulate demand
for the goods and services, capital investments and employment. For this
purpose the additional financial privileges are given to the private
capital, the state charges and investments are increased. In conditions of
long and rough rise in a national economy there can be dangerous phenomena
– using of commodity stocks, growth of import and deterioration of payment
balance, excess of demand on a labour above the offer and from here
unreasonable growth of wages and prices. In such situation, the task of
state regulation of economy — to brake growth of demand, capital
investments and manufacture whenever possible to reduce overproduction of
the goods and less products of the capitals and, thus, to reduce depth and
duration of possible recession of manufacture, investments and employment
in the future.

The state regulation of economy in the field of branch and territorial
structure also is carried out through financial stimulus and state capital
investments, which provide privileged conditions to separate branches and
regions. In one cases the support appears to branches and territorial units
which are taking place in a condition of long crisis; in others — the
development of new branches and kinds of manufactures — carriers of
scientific and technical progress called to result to progressive
structural changes inside branches, between branches and in all a national
economy as a whole. The increase of its efficiency and competitiveness is
encouraged. At the same time can be the stopping of excessive concentration
of manufacture arranged on.

Major object of state economy regulation is the accumulation of the
capital. Manufacture, assignment and capitalisation of the profit always
serve an overall objective of economic activity in market economy,
therefore state economic politics of encouragement of accumulation first of
all corresponds to economic interests to the subjects of an economy.
Simultaneously state regulation of accumulation is also used to serve also
to other objects of state economy regulation. Creating additional stimulus
and opportunities in different time to all investors or their separate
groups on branches and territories the regulating bodies influence a
business cycle and structure.

The regulation of employment is maintenance normal from the point of
view of market economy of parity between a supply and demand of a labour.
Parity should satisfy requirement of economy for the qualified and
disciplined workers, which wages serve for them a sufficient motivation to
work. However parity between a supply and demand should not conduct to
excessive growth of wages, which can be reflected negative in national
competitiveness. The sharp decrease of employment is undesirable also, it
conducts to increase the army of the unemployed, decrease of consumer
demanded, tax receipts, growth of the charges on the grants and, most
important, it is dangerous by social consequences.

Constant object of attention of state regulating bodies is money
manipulation. The basic orientation of regulation of money manipulation —
struggle with inflation representing serious danger to economy. The
regulation of money manipulation influences and other objects — condition
of accumulation, price, social relations.

The condition of payment balance is an objective parameter of economic
health of the country. In all countries with a market economy the state
constantly carries out operative and strategic regulation of payment
balance by influence on export and import, movement of the capital,
increase and downturn of rates of national currencies, marketcontractual
politics and participation in the international economic integration.

One more of the main objects of regulation — price. Changes and
structure of the prices reflect a condition of economy. At the same time
prices strongly influence structure of economy, condition of capital
investments, stability of national currency, social atmosphere.

The state regulating instances aspire to influence and other objects of
state regulation of economy, for example, to interest private concerns in
development of scientific researches and introduction of their results, in
export of goods, capitals, both saved knowledge and experience are studied
and the laws on observance of rules of a competition, social protection,
protection of an environment are improved.

The objects of state economy regulation of differ depending on a level
of tasks, solved by them. It is the following hierarchical levels: a level
of firm; region; branches; sectors of economy (industry, agriculture,
service); economy as a whole (economic cycle; the money manipulation; the
prices); global (social relations, ecology); economic-political relations
with foreign countries, integration processes).

The general purpose of state regulation of economy is the economic and
social stability and strengthening existing building inside the country and
abroad, adaptation to its varied conditions.

From this general purpose the tree so-called of the concrete purposes
is distributed, without which realisation the general purpose can not be
achieved. These concrete purposes indissoluble are connected with objects
of state regulation of economy. The purpose — alignment of a business cycle
— is directed on the object, that is on a business cycle; improvement of an
environment — on an environment etc.
It is obvious, that the purposes, first, uncommon on importance and
scales and, secondly are in close interrelation. More often one purpose can
not be put and is achieved without dependence from others. For example, it
is impossible to present stimulation НИОКР without creation of favourable
conditions of accumulation of the capital, without alignment of a
conjuncture, perfection of branch structure of economy, stable money
manipulation.

The listed purposes partially block each other, one can appear
temporarily more important and to subordinate to herself others depending
on a real economic and social situation, level of comprehension of this
situation by the subjects of state regulation of economy and from
established by governmental bodies on the given interval of time of system
of priorities of the purposes. Any of the above named purposes can serve,
to promote or to interfere with achievement of other purpose. The concrete
purposes inside a tree of the purposes can be primary, secondary, tertiary
etc. For example, in conditions of crisis the primary purpose becomes an
exit from crisis in narrow concrete sense — revival of a conjuncture. All
other purposes submit to it.

The means of state regulation are subdivided on administrative and
economic.

The administrative means are not connected with creation of additional
material stimulus or danger of financial damage. They are based on force of
state authority and include measures of an interdiction, sanction and
compulsion.

For example, the French authorities have forbidden to build the new
industrial enterprises within the limits of Parisian agglomerations, and
for achievement of this purpose they did not increase the taxes by the new
enterprises, have not entered rude the penalties, which could be economic
measures, and simply have stopped licensing for new industrial
construction.

Or, the government of the Netherlands has solved to use former naval
base as passenger and trade port, by creating, thus, new sphere of the
appendix of the capital. In result in area of port the economic activity
has increased.

The administrative means of regulation in the advanced countries with
market economy are used in insignificant scales. Their sphere of action
basically is limited to protection of an environment and creation of the
minimal household conditions rather poorly of socially protected layers of
the population. However in critical situations their role strongly grows,
for example, during war, emergency in economy. The most large-scale
administrative actions on regulation of economy in after War period of
Japan were currency reformed and made smaller of conducting concerns.

The economic means of state regulation are subdivided into means of
money credit and budget politics.

The independent complex tool of state regulation of economy (and
simultaneously by its object) is the public sector in economy. The maximum
form of state regulation of economy is a state economic programming
covering the numerous purposes and all tooling of state regulation of
economy. About public sector and economic programming the speech will go
below.

The basic economic means are:

1) Regulation of the registration rate (discount politics
which is carried out by the central bank);
2) Establishment and change of the sizes of the minimal
reserves, which financial institutions of the country are obliged to
keep in the central bank;
3) Operation of official bodies in the market of valuable
papers, such as issue of the state obligations, trade by them and
repayment.
Through these tools the state aspires to change a parity of a supply
and demand in the financial market (market of the loan capitals) in a
desirable direction. In process of relative decrease of a role of the
markets of the free capitals in financing capital investments and
especially in connection with reduction of a role of a share stock exchange
and growth of self-maintenance of the large companies by financial assets
the effectiveness of these tools in the most advanced countries has
weakened a little.

The direct state economic regulation is carried out by means of budget
politics. The state budget is an annual plan of the state charges and
sources of the incomes of their financial covering. The project of the
budget annually is discussed and is accepted by a legislative body —
parliament of the country, state or government by assembly. After the end
of financial the year the proxy representatives of the executive authority
report about the activity on mobilisation of the incomes and realisation of
the charges in conformity with accepted in the previous year by the law on
the budget.

The state budget always represents the compromise reflecting a parity
of forces of the basic groups of carriers of various social economic
interests. The charges of the state budget carry out functions of
political, social and economic regulation.

The first place in the budget charges is occupied with social clauses:
the special grants, education, public health services etc. In it the
overall objective of budget politics, as well as all state economic
politics in general — stabilisation, strengthening and adaptation existing
social economic building to varying conditions is shown. These charges are
called to soften differentiation of social groups, it is inevitable
peculiar to market character.

In expenses for economic needs the budget grants to agriculture are
usually allocated. Any state can not be interested in ruin the peasantry,
farmers. And though in the external economic politics of government
sometimes temporarily endow interests of the domestic manufacturers of the
agrarian goods, supposing foreign agricultural production on a home market
in reply to concession of the trade partners, as a rule governments support
average and large farmers land.

The charges on arms and material maintenance of external politics, and
also administrative charge influence demand for consumer goods and
services.

To the tactical purposes of budget regulation the charges on an
internal state duty (for example, prescheduled repayment of a part of the
debt), sizes of the charges on the credits both grants to the private and
state enterprises, agriculture, on creation and perfection of objects of an
infrastructure, on purchase of arms and military construction serve.

The sizes of these charges essentially influence scales of demand and
size of the investments. During crises and depressions the charges of the
state budget on the economic purposes, as a rule, grow, and in time when of
slowing conjuncture — are reduced.

The charges on crediting of export, insurance of the export credits and
taken out capital financed from the budget, stimulate export and in the
long-term plan improve payment balance, open for a national economy the new
foreign markets, promote strengthening of national currency, maintenance of
deliveries on a home market of the necessary goods because of a boundary.
It is the external economic aspect of politics of the budget charges.

The effectiveness of state regulation of economy with the help of the
budget charges depends, first, on the relative sizes of the spent sums;
secondly, from structure of these charges; thirdly, from efficiency of use
of each unit of spent means.

The main tools of mobilisation of financial assets for a covering of
the state charges are the taxes. They also are widely used for influence on
activity of the subjects of economy. It is a special role of the taxes. But
main role of the taxes — regulating. The state regulation through the taxes
depends in a decisive degree on a choice of tax system, and also from kinds
and sizes of tax privileges.

The taxes in state regulation of economy play a double role: on the one
hand, it is the main source of financing of the state charges, the material
basis of budget politics, on the other hand, is the tool of regulation. A
task of state budget bodies — not simply to impose with the taxes those or
other sources of receipt of means and to create the adjusted mechanism of
influence on economic behaviour of the legal and physical persons is thin.
For this purpose temporarily or selectively given tax discounts, delay of
payment of the taxes are used.

The special place among means of state regulation of economy which is
carried out through the taxes, plays accelerated amortisation of a fixed
capital and connected with it(him) formation(education) and realisation of
the latent reserves carried out within the framework of the sanctions of
the ministries of the finance.

Accelerated amortisation of a fixed capital in modern conditions is by
the main means of stimulation of accumulation, structural changes in
economy and important tool of influence on an economic cycle — the
employment. Essence it in a separation of physical process amortisation of
machines, equipment, buildings and structures from the production costs of
carry of cost of material carriers of a fixed capital on the made goods and
services. Changing the rates and order amortisation, the state regulating
bodies determine that part of the clean profit, which can be released from
the taxes by inclusion in production costs and then is listed in
amortisation fund for financing in the further new capital investments.

At check of correctness of payment of the tax from the profit the tax
inspectors agree with accounting of production costs or services only if
the amortisation deductions were made in conformity with norms solved by
the ministry of the finance. The size of the balance profit, rate and size
of the tax, and also paid dividends depends on it.

The variation of norms accelerated amortisation of a fixed capital is
widely used in all advanced countries as a means of state tactical and
structural politics, and also for stimulation of scientific researches and
introduction of their results, for financing nature protection of measures.
The effect of a variation of norms of amortisation deductions is swept up
within a favourable conjuncture, i.e. in the periods of slowing and crises
the effectiveness of amortisation politics weakens. The worse conjuncture,
the more difficult & is to realise profit, it is less than opportunities
for self-financing, and the amortisation privileges given by the state,
becomes less attractive stimulus for the private investments. The
privileges on accelerated amortisation are equivalent to reduction of
receipts from the taxes from profits in the state budget. Result can be
increase of other taxes or growth state duty.

The state capital investments are carried out substantially in public
sector of economy playing a major role in state regulation of economy. It
is simultaneously object and tool of influence on a private enterprise.

The public sector represents a complex of economic objects, wholly or
partially belonging to the central and local state bodies. The public
sector existed in many countries long before development of capitalism,
including mail, partially transport service, manufacturing of the weapon
etc. On a measure forming systems of state regulation of economy the state
built, redeemed at the private proprietors economic objects, mainly in
sphere of an infrastructure, heavy industry, which functioning was always
favourably and it is necessary for a national economy, but not always it is
favourable from the point of view of the private capital.

In one country the public sector has arisen basically as a result of
nationalisation of a number of branches and enterprises (in France, Italy,
Great Britain, Austria), in others the state built or got ruined economic
objects (in USA, Sweden, Japan). In the first group of the countries the
share of public sector in national riches is higher, than in second.

Significant parts of public sector are objects of an infrastructure, in
the majority unprofitable. Other part — the state enterprises in raw and
power branches, where are required the large investments, and turnover of
the capital slow. Profitability of state-owned firms, as a rule, below,
than private. A part of public sector is packages of the actions of the
mixed private-state companies.

The existence in conditions of a market economy of sectors, which in
the activity is guided by principles a little bit distinguished from
principles of private concerns, allows using public sector for the decision
of nation-wide economic tasks, increasing money of a private enterprise.

The exclusive profit, and frequently and profit in general, is not the
paramount purpose of activity of public sector in an infrastructure, power,
raw branches, НИОКР, in preparation and retraining of the staff, in the
field of protection of an environment, as high profits nobody requires of
these spheres, and the losses become covered from the budget. Therefore
public sector has become the supplier of cheap services (in particular,
transport, mail-telegraphic), electric power and raw material, reducing,
thus, costs in private sector.

The public sector as a means of state regulation of economy is actively
used. So, in conditions of deterioration of a conjuncture, the depressions
or crisis, when the private capital investments are reduced, investment in
public sector, as a rule, grow. Thus, the governmental bodies aspire to
counteract recession of manufacture and growth of unemployment. The public
sector plays an appreciable role in state structural politics. The state
creates new objects or expands and reconstructs old in those spheres of
activity, branches or regions, where the private capital connected is not
enough. So, the public sector plays a huge role in economy, preparation and
retraining of the staff. The state-owned firms are engaged also in foreign
trade, export of the capital abroad, frequently acting by the pioneers in
introduction of the national capital in any country (for example,
participation of the German concern “ Volkswagen ”, federal taking place in
property federal and ground governments, in motor industry of Czech).

In the whole public sector serves addition of a private enterprise
there and such measure, where and as far as the motivation for the private
capital appears insufficient. In result the public sector serves to
increase of efficiency of a national economy as a whole and is one of tools
of redistribution of a total internal product (the complete internal
product is a cumulative cost of production of sphere of material
manufacture and spheres of services, irrespective of a national accessory
of the enterprises located in territory of the given country).

The sizes of public sector, its share in national economy, change not
only as a result of new construction and purchase, but also as a
consequence of a privatisation — sale profitable, reconstructed objects of
public sector to the private capital. In 80-th and 90-th years this
tendency appreciably has amplified.

Alongside with the listed tools of state regulation of economy having
internal economy the orientation, an arsenal of means of the external
economic regulation exists.

Practically all levers of influence on process of reproduction inside
the country render essential influence on foreign economic relations:
change of the registration rate, taxation new privileges and grants on the
investment in a fixed capital etc.

However there are also special tools of direct influence on economic
communications with abroad. It is, first of all, a measure of stimulation
of export of goods, services, capitals, scientific and technical and
administrative experience: crediting of export, warranting of the export
credits and investments abroad, introduction or cancellation of
quantitative restrictions, change of the duty in foreign trade; measures on
attraction or restriction of access of the foreign capital in a national
economy, change of conditions of its functioning, qualitative selection
(from the point of view of a branch orientation and technological level)
acting from abroad capital, attraction in the country of a foreign labour,
participation in the international economic organisations, integration
state associations.

The separate tools of state economic politics can be used in the
various purposes, in various combinations and with different intensity.
Depending on character of the purposes the place of that or other tool in
an arsenal of means of state regulation of economy in the concrete period
will vary.

The maximum form of state regulation of economy is the state economic
programming. Its task — complex use in the global purposes of all elements
of state regulation of economy.

In process of complication of tasks on regulation of economy of
government of steel to formulate short-term, intermediate term and long-
term tasks to determine the order of their decision and bodies responsible
for performance of these decisions, to allocate necessary means and to
determine the order of financing.

Objects of such target programs usually are the branches (in
particular, agriculture); regions; social sphere (for example, social
economic adaptation settlers, maintenance by their work and habitation);
various directions of scientific researches.

The programs are usual and extreme. The usual intermediate term
programs are made, as a rule, for five years with annual updating and
prolongation for one year (sliding programming). The extreme programs are
developed in critical situations, for example, in conditions of crisis,
mass unemployment dangerous inflation; they, as a rule, short-term. In
toolkits of their realisation the appreciable place is occupied with means
of administrative regulation.

The level of development of state programming in the separate countries
is various. Practically in all countries of market economy the target
programs are carried out. One of oldest — regional-power target program on
development of pool of the river Tennessee in USA, program of development
of nuclear power in France, economic development of the south of Italy.

The national extreme programs on restoration of economy of Southern
Korea after war, on structural reorganisation and privatisation of new
grounds (East Germany) after connection of GDR to Germany are known.

In a citadel of a market economy — USA — the national programming is
not present, but widely target and extreme programs are applied. Obviously,
the distinctions in a degree of development of programming in the separate
countries depend on character and scales of tasks, which economic and
social situation puts before the state.

The subjects of economic programming — official bodies responsible for
drawing up of the programs, their direct realisation and control above
them. The programs are developed by a special state body (for example,
Commissaries on planning in France), and if it is not present, by the
ministries of economy and finance or special ministry system. Thus the
ministry of economy, as a rule, prepares the project of the program,
formulates hierarchy of the purposes, terms and sequence of realisation of
separate measures, names instances which are bearing responsibility for
performance.

The ministry of the finance develops the plan of financing of the
program. The representatives of the central bank, unions of the
businessmen, commercial and industrial chambers, trade unions are widely
involved in development of the programs, the various commissions and advice
of the experts are created.

The program and financial plan are annually (in connection with a
sliding principle of prolongation) affirmed by parliament, also of time per
one year the reports on their performance are heard.

The state economic programming has appeared rather effective at the
decision of a number of economic and social tasks, however this efficiency
has objective borders. In conditions of market economy the programming can
be only indicative, that is to carry target-stimulating character.
Nevertheless, it has appeared a rather effective means of the decision of
tasks of a different level; if the state programs frequently also were not
realised completely, all of them — provided social economic development in
a desirable direction. That circumstance is not less important also, that
the programming allows systematically using all means of state regulation
of economy, to avoid discrepancy and inconsistency of regulating measures
of separate official bodies.

State financial stimulation, orders and the purchases within the
framework of the economic programs render appreciable and non-uniform
influence on competitiveness of the separate companies, situation of
branches, regions, of social groups and cause resistance what interests
have appeared restrained. On state programming systems therefore constantly
there is a versatile influence reflecting inconsistent interests of
separate groups, public forces, political groups.

Let's consider the mechanism of state regulation on an example of
politics of the prices.

Contrary to widespread at many to opinion, that in the countries of
market economy money appearing occurs spontaneously, actually prices are
object of constant attention and regulation on the part of the state. The
prices are one of critical points economic and social — political life,
where the group interests of the manufacturers and consumers, wholesale and
retail dealers, trade unions and unions of the businessmen, exporters and
importers collide. The prices mention interests everyone and, naturally,
around of them there is a struggle in parties and parliaments, in
government and on negotiation of the social partners, at the international
meetings.

The influence on the prices serves to the global purposes of state
regulation of economy, purposes of tactical and structural politics,
struggle with inflation, amplification of national competitiveness in the
world markets and mitigation of social intensity. The influence of state
economic politics on other objects of regulation, in turn, is reflected in
processes of formation of the prices.

The concrete actions in the field of the prices can have short-term or
even the emergency purposes, which can in the given concrete moment not
coincide with other purposes, but at the end they always serve of the
general purpose of state regulation — optimisation of rates both
proportions of economic development and stabilisation of social system

The classical political economy examined the prices, freely developing
in the market, as the main element of the mechanism of maintenance of
balance between a supply and demand. However actually there was never of
ideal general and complete freedom money appearing. All question in a
degree and forms of restriction of free game of the prices. Even if to
abstract from opportunities of arrangement of the manufacturers and
sellers, during all history of capitalism it is possible to look after
influence of the state on the prices.

The tariffs for services of state iron roads, mail, telegraph, sale of
the foodstuffs from state stocks per poor harvest years, customs politics
and indirect taxation essential image influencing on the internal price, —
here the not complete list of measures of state price control for last 100
— 150 years.

The first world war which has begun after it depression and crisis,
have served as the moment of changes in a history of state price control.
K. Muller wrote in this occasion, that the political and economic shocks in
the state and society have caused comprehension that in interests of the
best functioning of a economy, more uniform distribution and avoidance of
danger of revolutionary revolution it would be expedient, that the state
has undertaken care of regulation of economic process and maintenance of
the fair prices.

Attempts to adjust the prices in conditions of inflation and crisis by
the foreign trade politics have appeared insolvent. To the middle of the 30-
th years in many advanced countries with market economy the laws giving to
the state powers on influence on the prices, down to their freezing were
accepted, and the state measures on influence on the prices become a
component of state regulation of economy.

The state measures on price control can carry legislative,
administrative and judicial character. The laws, accepted by parliaments,
create a legal basis of the relations between the economic subjects, and
also between them and state in sphere money appearing. The complex of these
laws represents the price right entering by a component into civil law. On
the basis of this right the authorised state bodies carry out
administrative activity on price control. In case of infringement of the
laws guilty can be involved in the judicial responsibility.

Party fractions independent deputies bring in the administration bills
of the prices, as well as on other economic questions, to parliaments or
government, is direct measures on price control carry out the ministries of
economy, finance and central bank. In a number of the countries there are
ministries of trade, agriculture. They also render influence on money
appearing. In many countries at the end of 60 — in the 70-th years ministry
advice under the prices was created, they have is observant — consultative
functions.

In each country at government or its separate bodies there are expert
committees, where the known experts, and advice, in which they meeting the
representatives of trade unions, unions of the peasants, dealers,
businessmen and representatives of state bodies enter; the committees are
called to advise state bodies on the prices and to express the opinion
concerning the price administration bills.

Let's consider state price control in a historical and logic sequence.

The supervision over the prices is the primary form of state activity
in this area. The business not only that from it began state price control;
now supervision over the prices forms the basis, on which all state actions
in this area are based. In supervision over the prices the central
statistical managements are engaged. The independent researches of movement
of the prices frequently will carry out the research centres of trade
unions special commissions under orders of a management of parties,
international organisations.

Overall objective of supervision behind the prices on the part of state
bodies and social partners — change of growth of cost of life for
definition of an index of annual nominal increase of wages and pensions,
and also for finding — out of influence of a rise in prices on production
costs and national competitiveness. The state can affect the prices,
entering or cancelling quantitative and customs restrictions in foreign
trade, entering in integration unions, changing the registration rate,
varying the taxes, carrying out a currency issue etc. The indirect
influence on the prices is rendered, in essence, by(with) all state
regulating actions(shares), with what the purposes they did not serve.

The state intervention in process money appearing is carried out by the
overestimate, authorised by governmental bodies, of production costs
through inclusion in the cost price overestimated amortisation and
deductions in other funds. As a result of it in the whole branches there is
a situation, when “ the costs prop up the price ”, i.e. settlement (instead
of valid) the production costs appear at all enterprises of branch as a
result of the privileges, announced by government, are so high, that the
increase of the prices becomes itself by the understood phenomenon, and as
the privileges are distributed to all branch, internal branches the
competition in conditions of a favourable conjuncture can not be a
sufficient obstacle for a rise in prices.

Direct state intervention in process money appearing is the state
politics of an establishment of the prices on the so-called excise goods.

The direct influence on formation of the prices is rendered with the
state grants. One of kinds of such grants — price — provides decrease of
the prices by special surcharges to the manufacturer or consumer.

The direct influence on the prices and leadership in the prices has a
place in branches, where the share of the state in consumption of the goods
and services is significant, for example, in military industries, in a
number down-branches of construction. The governmental bodies, being by the
constant buyers or customers of the certain kinds of the goods and services
at private concerns, establish under the arrangement with the partners “
the concrete prices ”, which become then base prices for branch.

Effective means of price control is the tax to additional cost. The
manufacturers include this tax in the price of the goods or service, and
difference of change of the rates of this tax directly influences the
prices.

The special direction of state economic politics is the state influence
on the foreign trade prices. State encouragement of export, clearing of the
exporters of the taxes (return of the taxes), and in some countries — the
export grants, granting of the soft loans and transport tariffs by an
essential image are reflected in conditions of a price competition in the
world market.

Establishment of the prices on mineral raw material extracted in state
mines, on the electric power from state power stations and railway, mail-
telegraphic tariffs — example of fixing of the prices on the goods and
services state sector.

These is artificial undercharges and the tariffs promote decrease of
production costs in a private enterprise and increase of national
competitiveness for the account is artificial of the lowered profitability
or deficiency of these objects of a state ownership.

Fixing of the prices or establishment of limits of their increase in
public sector — typical means of administrative economic regulation. It is
seldom applied and, as a rule, in conditions of a market economy is
inefficient in long-term and even intermediate term aspect. It is used more
often in exclusive cases as a means of easing of social intensity.

National bodies carry out the control above the prices for the certain
kinds of the goods.

Examples can serve an establishment of the prices on coal and black
metals by the European association of steel, annual establishment of
procurement prices on agricultural products in the European union,
participation of the countries in the international conferences,
organisations on separate kinds of the goods, tariffs for an airline
traffic.

One of the difficulties of the questions of economic politics is the
management of inflation. In the world there are not enough of countries,
where in second half 20 centuries there was no inflation. Though it has
come on change of former illness of market economy, which has become
obviously to weaken, — cyclic crises.

The inflation is a depreciation of money, decrease of their buying
power. Usually inflation has in the basis not one, and some interconnected
reasons, and are shown it not only in increase of the prices — alongside
with open, by price inflation has a place latent, or suppressed, inflation
shown first of all in deficiency, deterioration of quality of the goods. In
literal translation with the Latin inflation means “swelling”, i.e.
overflow of channels of the manipulation by the superfluous paper money
which has been not supplied with the appropriate growth of commodity
weight.

The reasons of inflation are diverse. Usually in a basis of inflation
the discrepancy of money demand and commodity weight — demand for the goods
lays and services exceeds the sizes goods turnover, that creates conditions
that the manufacturers and suppliers lifted the prices irrespective of a
level of costs. A disproportion between a supply and demand, excess of the
incomes above the consumer charges can be deviated by deficiency budjet
(charges of the state exceed the incomes); by excessive investment (volume
of the investments exceeds opportunities of economy); by outstripping
growth of wages in comparison with growth of manufacture and increase of
productivity of work; by an any establishment of state-set prices causing
skews in size and structure of demand; by other factors.

Let's refer as an example to a sharp aggravation of deficiency state
budjet in Russia in the second half of 80-th years (1985-1989 years — break
between profitable and account parts of the state budget has grown, with 18
up to 120 billion rub., or from 3,5 % up to 19 % to the national income of
the country). The increased deficiency has put huge harm to the money
manipulation, has urged on inflation. The unjustified money payments
sharply have worsened a situation in the consumer market.

The reasons of occurrence of inflation can be both internal, and
external. To the external reasons concern, in particular, reduction of
receipts from foreign trade, negative results of the foreign trade and
payment balances. The inflationary process in Russia strengthened fall of
the prices in the global market on fuel and colour metals making important
clause of our export, and also adverse conjuncture in the grain market in
conditions of significant import grain. In Hungary, which economy in the
greater measure depends on a condition of foreign economic relations, just
the external factor (deterioration of conditions of international trade,
increase of the external debt) played a hardly probable not determining
role in amplification inflationary processes. Thus the politics of
escalating of export and restraint of import reduced growth internal,
wholesale and consumer costs.

The inflationary rise in prices alongside with the marked factors is
caused by the deeper reasons having basic character. Let's consider on an
example of Russia.

First, as a rule, one of sources of inflationary processes the
deformation of economic structure expressing in essential backlog of
branches of consumer sector at obvious super-changed development of
branches of heavy industry serves and is especial of military mechanical
engineering.

Secondly, inability to overcome inflation is deviated by lacks of an
economic mechanism. In conditions of the centralised economy practically
there was no feedback, there were no effective economic levers, which were
capable to adjust a parity between money and commodity weight; as to
administrative terminators, they “worked” insufficiently effectively. In
system of financial planning state plan played a determining role, instead
of Ministry of finance and not the State Bank, which “worked” under it,
supporting the scheduled tasks financial and money resources without any
restrictions.

Becoming traditional the politics of high rates of economic development
ignored real resource opportunities. To support rates, the capital
investments were constantly increased. In result the growth of consumption
restrained; the efficiency of capital investments fell that negatively had
an effect for economic growth and current manufacture. The means for new
technology did not suffice, and continuous growing of fund of accumulation
did not give desirable result. A problem died any more in amount of a
capital investment, and in their efficiency, structure to reconstruct which
economic mechanism prevented.

The contradiction and deficiencies deleted there are more means, and
the financial and budget terminators were very weak or practically were
absent. Unbalanced took place not only in the consumer market. Its basis —
increasing disproportion in the manufacture, strengthening financially —
financial not of balance, defects in system of planning, in the mechanism
of the money manipulation, in absence of antiinflationary regulation.

Examining the reasons of inflation, the economists will carry out
distinction between two its kinds — “ by inflation of the buyers “
(inflation of demand) and “ by inflation of the sellers “ (inflation of
costs). In effect, it is two, as a rule, interconnected, but unequivalent
reasons of inflation: one lays on the part of demand (surplus of money
resources at the buyers), another — on the part of the offer (growth of
industrial costs).
Depending on character of inflation and rates of increase of
inflationary processes distinguish the following types of inflation:
1) Slow inflation, for which the rather low rates of a rise in prices,
approximately up to ten or several percents per one year are
characteristic. Such inflation is inherent in the majority of the countries
with the advanced market economy, and it is not represented by something
unusual. The average level of inflation on the countries of the European
community has made for last years about 3 — 3,5%.
2) Galloping inflation is difficult in ruling.

The rate of its growth is expressed usually in two-place figures. Such high
rates in the 80-th years were observed, for example, in many countries of
Latin America, some countries of Southern Asia. The galloping rise in
prices shows itself unequally and has not the strictly designated
quantitative parameters. The inflationary processes depend on a level of
development of the country, social economic structure unsimilar regulation
of price processes. In the period after war — the period of capitalism has
gone through two large waves of inflation: at transition from military
economy of a market type (1945-1952) and under influence “ of petroleum
shocks ”, is sharp shocked all structure of the world and internal prices
(1974-1981). But it was possible to western countries to stop inflationary
processes, using various methods of antiinflationary regulation. For the
small countries, for example of Sweden, it was important to avoid imported
inflation, for what the increase of the prices of national currency was
used. Other countries resorted to methods of restraint of inflation by
means of money-credit politics.
3) The greatest danger represents super-inflation. Its conditional
boundary — monthly (within three-four months) rise in prices more than 50%,
and annual will be expressed four numbers in figures. The feature super-
inflation that it appears practically unguided; the usual functional
interrelations and habitual levers of management of the prices do not work.
On complete power the printed machine tool works, the gamble develops mad.
Manufacture will be disorganised. To stop or to brake super-inflation it is
necessary to resort to extreme measures. But there is no unequivocal
representation about that, how to struggle with super-inflation. The rather
inconsistent recipes are assumed various, quite often.
To outstrip inevitable, increase, expected by all, of the prices, the
owners of “hot” money aspire as soon as possible gets rid of them. In
result is developed great demand; those goods are bought up first of all
which can serve a means of partial preservation of the savings (real
estate, subjects of art, precious metals). The people work under pressure
“inflationary crisis ”, and it grow a rise in prices, and the inflation
begins to feed itself.
Classical example super-inflation — conditions which has been usual in
Germany and a number of other countries after the First World War. In
Germany in 1923 the level of a rise in prices was estimated 10 numbers and
12 numbers by numbers; the wages should be spent immediately, for within
day of the price on products raised repeatedly.
The process of inflation is inconsistent. On the one hand, the money
profits are increased, the capital investments extend, and with another —
the rise in prices conducts to depreciation of the unused capital. Win not
everything, and, first of all strong firms having the modern equipment,
perfect organisation of manufacture. In the best rule(situation) there are
social groups living on the not fixed incomes, if their nominal incomes
will grow by rate overtaking a rise in prices.
From inflation the people who take money on credit can win, if not is
stipulated, that percent for the credit should take into account an
inflationary rise in prices.
But whichever there were positive functions of inflation, leaving from
under the control and even remaining rather weak, adjusted, the inflation
renders on a course of economic development the whole complex especially of
negative phenomena.
To negative consequences of inflationary processes concern:
— Decrease of the real incomes of the population;
— Depreciation of the savings of the population (the increase of
percents on the contributions, as a rule, does not compensate fall of the
real sizes of the savings);
— The loss at the manufacturers of interest in creation of the
qualitative goods (is increased release of the goods of poor quality,
manufacture of the rather cheap goods) is reduced;
— Restriction of sale of agricultural products in city by the rural
manufacturers by virtue of fall of interest, in expectation of increase of
the prices on the foodstuffs;
— Deterioration of conditions of life mainly at the representatives of
social groups with the firm incomes (pensioners serving, students, which
incomes are formed for the account state budget);
— Easing positions of imperious structures (is reduced trust to the
programs and measures planned and carried out government).
The management of inflation represents a major problem money-credit and
in the whole economic politics. The ways of management are ambiguous, are
inconsistent on the consequences. The range of parameters for realisation
of such politics can be rather narrow: on the one hand, it is required to
constrain growth of an inflationary spiral, and with another — to support
stimulus of manufacture to create conditions for saturation of the market
by the goods.
The management of inflation assumes use of the complex measures
assisting in a certain measure to combine an insignificant rise in prices
with stabilisation of the incomes. The tools of management of process
differ depending on character and rate of inflation, features of economic
conditions, specificity of an economic mechanism of the different
countries.
For antiinflationary regulation two are used such as economic politics:
1) Politics directed on reduction of budget deficiency, restriction of
credit expansion, restraint of money issue. In conformity with material the
recipes apply targets — regulation of rate of a gain of money weight in the
certain limits — according to rate of growth of a total national product
2) Politics of price control and incomes having by the purpose to co-
ordinate growth of earnings with a rise in prices. One of means serves
index of the incomes determined by a level of a minimum conditions of life
or a standard consumer basket and connected with dynamics of an index of
the prices. For restraint of the undesirable phenomena the limits of
increase or freezing of wages can be established, to be limited
distribution of the credits etc.
The influence on inflationary process in conditions of a sharp rise in
prices requires special measures. So, for elimination of consequences “ of
a petroleum shock ”, struck on economy of USA in second half of 70-th
years, the registration rates were increased, the requirements to the sizes
of reserve funds are amplified, the system of the taxation is stipulated.
To lower rates of an inflationary rise in prices it was possible not at
once: from 13-14 of % in 1979 they have decreased to 4 % after about three
years — in 1982.
As the experience testifies, to stop inflation with the help of one
organisational measures rather difficulty if not to tell it is impossible.
The structural reform directed on overcoming of disproportion’s, that has
arisen in economy is necessary for this purpose.
The concrete methods of restraint of inflation, “dose” and sequence of
application of means, attracted for treatment, depend on statement of the
correct diagnosis. To put the diagnosis — means, to determine character of
inflation, to allocate the factors, basic and connected to them, which
makes the growth of inflationary processes. In this case it is not
necessary to expect for any ready circuits, and series of extreme measures
to finish with inflation. Each inflation is specific and assumes
application of such recipes, which correspond to character and depth of
“disease”.
Constant consequence in particular of inflationary process is the
unemployment. By virtue of importance of this problem the state accepts the
special measures for regulation of the market of work.
The market of work — important sphere economic and social — political
life of a society. In the market of work labour receives an estimation
cost, the conditions of its employment, including size of wages, working
conditions, opportunity of reception of education, professional growth,
guarantee of employment etc are defined. The market of work reflects the
basic tendencies in changes of employment, its(her) basic structures
(branch, vocational, demographic), i.e. in a public division of labour,
mobility of a labour, scales and changes of unemployment.
The unemployment is a social economic phenomenon, at which the part of
a labour (economically of active population) is not engaged in manufacture
of the goods and services. The unemployed alongside with engaged form a
labour of the country. In real economic life the unemployment acts as
excess of a labour above demand for it(her). To the unemployed, according
to statistics of many advanced countries, the persons who have been not
engaged on the moment of realisation of interrogation about the status of
their employment, undertaking attempts concern to find work within the
previous four weeks and registered on labour exchange.
Heavy for the countries of West were 30 years of our century. In USA
the rate of unemployment has reached 25%. The diagram showing the dynamics
of a rate of unemployment in USA for 100 years is rather curious (1890-
1990).
If the share of the unemployed makes 1-3 % in general army of work, not
it is accepted to count employment insignificant. Especially dangerous in
social sense not employment (absence of work within 40 weeks and more) is
long chronic.
It is important to emphasise, that to the unemployed usually carry not
only dismissed on the various reasons, but also persons voluntary left
works and undertaking attempt to find new. The structure of unemployment
for its reasons includes four basic categories of a labour:
1) Lost work as a result of dismissal;
2) Voluntary left work;
3) Come on the market of work after a break;
4) For the first time come on the market of work.
The parity of these categories depends, first of all, on a phase of a
business cycle.
The monthly average rate of unemployment within the given year pays off
under the formula:

UE*100 of %
Lue = ——————
LFc,

Where Lue — level (norm) of unemployment, %; UE — monthly average
number of the unemployed; LFc — number of a civil labour.

There are some concepts treating a phenomenon of unemployment. In
Mark’s of the theory it usually connect to process of accumulation of the
capital, at which the requirement for alive work (variable capital) is
increased slower, than in machines, equipment (constant capital). In
western economic science the point of view dominates, according to which
the unemployment in the basis reflects an economic feasibility of use of
resources, just as, say degree of loading of capacities reflects expediency
and efficiency of use of a fixed capital. A so-called natural rate of
unemployment reflecting structural disproportion in the market of work
(between structure of a supply and demand of a labour on qualification, by
demographic and other criteria). To natural unemployment carry also so-
called friction unemployment connected mainly to voluntary transition of
the workers from one work on another and to seasonal fluctuations in demand
for a labour.
In USA in the 60-th years as a natural rate of unemployment the
parameter in 4,3 %, in 70-th — already 6,6 %, in 80-th — about 7% was
considered. The excess of unemployment above a natural level is determined
in the basic cyclic factor, i.e. condition of a conjuncture in the country.
Changes of unemployment is influenced, besides demographic factors,
with changes in structure of economy, condition of foreign trade and export
of the capital, scales of the military charges, economic and social
politics of the state.
Owing to variety of internal regulators of the market of a labour, and
also by virtue of social importance of its effective functioning the market
of work requires the qualified regulation.
It is possible to allocate four basic directions of state regulation of
the market of work. First, it is the programs on stimulation of growth of
employment and increase of number of workplaces in public sector, secondly,
programs directed on preparation and retraining of a labour, and, thirdly,
program of assistance to hiring of a labour. Besides the government accepts
the programs on social insurance of unemployment, i.e. allocates means for
the grants with the unemployed.
Within the framework of this program in USA, for example, in after war
period — hundred thousand workplaces in public sector (in sphere of public
services — education, health services, municipal services, and also in
construction of public buildings and structures and in remaking works) were
created. With the help of these programs the rate of unemployment at the
end of the 70-th years was artificial is underestimated on 0,8 percentage
items.
The more and more important meaning gets state assistance to hiring.
So, service of giving jobs in USA having more of 2500 local agencies
(labour exchanges), is engaged in registration of the unemployed, tries to
find by it vacancies, will carry out testing the applicants for work for
definition of their qualification.
The listed directions do not settle all measures of influence of the
state on the market of work. Alongside with them there is a complex of
measures of indirect regulation of a labour: tax, money-credit and
amortisation politics of government. Besides the considerable influence on
the market of work renders also legislation — about social maintenance,
about the labour relations, about the equal civil rights etc.
The measures of indirect regulation of the market of a labour
simultaneously are also measures economic of regulation and influence a
conjuncture in the country.
The special place in system of regulation of the market of work is
occupied with labour exchange (service of employment, service to assistance
to hiring), being one of the important structures of a market economic
mechanism. It represents special establishment, which is carrying out
intermediary functions in the market of a labour. In the majority of the
countries of labour exchange are state and carry out the activity under the
direction of the ministry of work or body, similar to it(him). At the same
time in the market of work alongside with state services of employment the
large number of private intermediate firms functions, the efficiency of
which activity is very high.
The basic directions of activity of labour exchanges are:
1) Registration of the unemployed;
2) Registration of vacant places;
3) Giving jobs to the unemployed and other persons wishing to get a
job;
4) Study of a conjuncture of the market of work and granting of the
information about it(her);
5) Testing the persons wishing to offer work;
6) Professional orientation and professional retraining of the
unemployed;
7) Payment of the grants.
The majority of the economists believe, that the problem of
unemployment and other disproportion in the market of work can be softened
only with the help of a combination of various means — stimulation of
economic growth, reduction of working week, creation of an effective system
of retraining of the staff.
Thus, the modern state regulation of the market of work represents a
complex of economic, administrative, organisational and other measures.
The existing nowadays system of state regulation of economy has
developed not at once. During the development it has passed some stages:
1) Creation of general favourable conditions for reproduction of the
private capital; a concentration of efforts of the state on development of
the labour, tax, trade, social legislation, customs politics, on
maintenance of stability of money. Construction and purchase of objects in
raw and infrastuctural branches.
2) The unmatched among them actions of an anticrisis and structural
orientation, attempt to influence employment and prices.
3) Experiments with use of money-credit and budget means of regulation
of economy. A wave of a privatisation of objects of a state ownership.
4) Transition in a number of the countries to branch and regional
intermediate term programming; attempts to increase effectiveness of state
regulation of economy by study of compatibility and interchangeability of
tools of regulation, definition of their efficiency.
5) Realisation in the increasing number of the advanced countries of
nation-wide intermediate term programming in a combination to development
long-term perspective ways. More and more address, dosing and complex use
of tools of regulation.
6) Measure as agreed of nation-wide intermediate term programs at an
interstate level in framework integration of associations; steps in a
direction national of planning.
On scales, the tools and efficiency of state regulation of economy
decisive influence rendered tasks rising before economy of the separate
countries, material opportunities of the states reflected in a share to
them of a total internal product and in the absolute sizes of means, which
it is ready to use on state regulation of economy accrued experience and
successes in scientific development of problems of state economic politics
in conditions of a market economy.
The mechanism of state regulation of economy is constantly improved,
irrespective of, the governments on principles of economic politics are
guided or are inclined to use more rigid budget tools of regulation. In
modern conditions the practice of state regulation of economy has appeared
rather productive to not admit general crises and social — dangerous of
scales of unemployment.

The literature.

1) Economy. The textbook for economic academies, high schools and
faculties. Under edition of the candidate of economic sciences, senior
lecturer of AMPERE-SECOND. Bulatova. Publishing house. Moscow 1995.
2) Macroeconomic. The manual. M.K. Bunkina,V.A. Semenov. Publishing
house “ Moscow 1995.
3) Social market economy. The German way. Chaints Lampert. Publishing
house “Business”. Moscow 1994.
4) Market economy. The textbook. Volume 1, part 1. Publishing house
“Somintek”. Moscow 1992.

Метки:
Автор:

Опубликовать комментарий