CONTENTS:
Number:
                       Pages:
1. Introduction
                     2-4
Chapter 1. Concept, Manifestations and Tendencies of
Drug Abuse
                     4-14
2. The Concept and Manifestation of Drug Abuse                            4-
11
3. Tendencies of Development
          11-14
Chapter II. System and Classification of Measures to Overcome
Drug Abuse
                    14-22
4. System of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse                            14-
17
5. Classification of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse                  17-22
Chapter III. Drug Abuse in the International Law                      22-38
6. International Fora and Legal Acts on Drugs
  22-34
7. Tendencies in the World Community's Reaction to Drug Abuse. 34-37
Chapter IV. Measures to Suppress and Prevent Drug Abuse     37-40
Chapter V. Organized Measures to Counteract Narcotics          40-57
8. General Provisions for Counteracting Narcotics
41-45
9. Organization of Medical Counteraction to Narcotics                    45-
49
10. Enforcement of Legal Measures of Narcotics Counteraction     50-53
11. Other Organizational Measures to Combat Narcotics                53-57
					







12. Conclusion
                   57-58
                                Introduction
    The 20th century has witnessed the spread of narcotics to the entire
world. In the past narcotics in the natural economy were confined to
territories where drug-bearing plants were grown. By the end of century
drug addiction has become a worldwide socially dangerous trend.
    Narco-dealers making fabulous profits infect more and more people and
even entire social groups with drug addiction. Narcotics have long since
gone beyond the borders of traditional drug-producing areas and have
infiltrated all the countries of the world, exerting its malicious effect
on their peoples. It has affected social, economic, political and
biological aspects of life.
    Statistics is constantly reporting the spread of drug addiction and the
growth in the number of drug addicts on file at medical institutions, as
well as the rise in officially recorded drug-related crimes.
    Drug abuse has become a real plague of the 20th century in many
countries of the world and may become the plague of this country in
particular.
    The pleasurable sensations of comfort and satisfaction that a person
experiences using narcotics is much greater than that of alcohol thus
making the repetition necessary. Consequently, dependence on drugs and the
desire to enlarge the dose or experiment with the new and more powerful
drugs increases. Gradually the desire for dope becomes so overwhelming that
it degrades the addict's individuality. The transition from experimentation
to dependence is no longer a secret for it has been studied thoroughly.
Profit seeking dealers expand the drug market at any cost by supplying
drugs to more and more addicts taking advantage of their weaknesses.
    Drug sales are the closing stage in drug trafficking. Drug trade earns
huge profits that cover the costs of cultivating drug-bearing plants,
producing (or illegally acquiring from medical institutions)
transportation, sale expenses, and the bribery of officials, including
those of the law enforcement agencies. Since illegal drug trafficking is
extremely advantageous in terms of illegal profit accumulation and so
harmful and immoral it must be regarded by the entire world community as a
socially dangerous phenomenon. Some countries qualify its certain
manifestations as a heinous crime.
    Throughout this century international organizations have been paying
much attention to actions against drug abuse. For example, in 1909 the
Shanghai Opium Commission approved documents to restrict drug trafficking
between countries. The international opium conference held in the Hague
between 1911 and 1912 worked out, for the first time in history, the drug
convention of 1912. The conference on opium held in Geneva between 1924 and
1925 approved, on February 11, 1925, an Agreement under which opium was
made a government monopoly. The second Geneva conference on opium passed a
convention on February 19, 1925, under which narcotics were to be produced
only for the purpose of meeting the countries' legal demand for them.
Besides this convention stipulated the extension of the list of drugs. On
July 13, 1931, an international convention limiting the production of drugs
and regulating their distribution was approved in Geneva. It came into
force in 1933. A convention of actions against the illegal trade in hard
drugs was signed in Geneva on June 26, 1936. It made international
prosecution for drug-related crimes possible and introduced punishments for
such crimes compared with the previous conventions.
    In 1946, the UN Economic and Social Council passed a resolution that
provided for the international drug control and for the establishment of a
drug commission for this purpose. On November, 19 1946, the UN General
Assembly passed resolution 54/1 which endorsed a Protocol on Drugs. It was
signed at Lake Success on December 11, 1946. At the initiative of the Drug
Commission, a protocol extending the international control over drugs set
forth by the 1931 convention, was signed at the third UN General Assembly
session in Paris on November 19, 1948. A Protocol on Control over opium
poppy, consisting of the Preamble and the Final Act, was signed in New York
at the UN opium conference on June 23, 1953. The UN conference in New York
in 1961 approved a Uniform Drug Convention and in 1971 in Vienna a special
diplomatic conference passed a convention that stipulated the establishment
of a control over psychotropic preparations. The UN conference in Vienna in
1988 adopted a convention of actions against the illegal trafficking of
drugs and psychotropic substances. In keeping with the decisions of the G
Seven heads of state and governments and of the European Commission
Chairman, the 15th top-level economic summit in Paris set up a special
group in July 1989 to deal with the laundering of drug money. Upon this
group's recommendations, the International Drug Control Council called on
all the governments to approve, among other things, legislative acts
against attempts to launder money obtained from drug sales and to ensure
their effective use. The list of international antidrug conferences and
their drug-prevention documents alone, as well as the establishment of
special international bodies and organizations to carry out their
decisions, is a graphic illustration of how serious the world community's
effort to oppose drug abuse has been.
    A lot of people today are drawn into the process of illegal drug
trafficking: from those engaged in cultivating drugs or producing medical
preparations containing drugs, to drug salesmen and dealers engaged in
money-laundering. At times these people form groups, which are termed,
organized criminal groups or associations by the criminal code. On the one
hand, these groups take control of drug-related crimes and draw people who
commit such crimes on their own. And on the other hand, they establish firm
organizational ties among themselves forming drug cartels in order to
monopolize drug trafficking in the vast regions of the world. This shows
that there is a continuous blending process between narcotics and organized
crime. These factors characterize the highest degree of danger that
narcotics represent. They prove the pressing need to increase worldwide
action against narcotics. This action calls for the use of all possible
means: political, legal, economic, and medical among others.
    The antidrug campaign is a big drain on the material resources of the
country. It involves large spending on various programs such as preventive
Medicare, law-enforcement, legal and economic measures, and other. If this
spending is to be rational and effective, a range of measures should be
outlined with the utmost precision and professionally implemented.
    All this calls for a comprehensive analysis of the existing situation
and of the possible opposition by drug dealers. As the owners of enormous
wealth, which sometimes exceeds the budgets of some countries, drug dealers
are able to influence government policies, especially in small countries.
Mainly bribing top government officials in the legislative or the executive
branches ensures this influence. As a result, criminals get a chance to
interfere in law making from the outset. The bribery of the law enforcement
officers and of the officers of the court, among others, makes it possible
to cover up drug deals, prevent exposed members of the criminal
associations involved in these deals from prosecution or substantially
curtail their prison terms.
    Unlike the United States and other wealthy countries, smaller nations
are in no position to allocate sufficient sums from their budgets to carry
out effective antidrug projects. Research-based guidance may to a certain
extent make up for the lack of necessary funding. And here government-
supported antidrug programs may play an essential role.
    The study of drug abuse has always been prominent in the study of law.
Many booklets, articles, serious textbooks, and monographs are devoted to
narcotics. It is as hard to cover all aspects of the problem, even in the
most profound study, as it is to establish absolute truth, especially,
since reality keeps creating new problems all the time.
    The key solution lies in the need to pool international efforts in
eradicating drug addiction and narco-business. In the present-day world
with its integration processes it is impossible to do away with drug
addiction in any one country. Yet there is no way for the world community
to regard itself free from the problem even at a time when drugs will be a
peril only in one particular country. An intensive and continuous buildup
of the world community's joint effort against narcotics is a top priority
objective of the world at large.
       Chapter 1. Concept, Manifestations and Tendencies of Drug Abuse
               1. The Concept and Manifestation of Drug Abuse
    Sociologists, lawyers and medical experts single out three basic
aspects of drug abuse: social, legal and medical.
    These aspects are interconnected and interdependent and reveal the
diverse nature of drug abuse. Moreover one can also point out the
criminological, economic and ecological aspects.
    To highlight the entire multiplicity of this phenomenon, it is
necessary to go beyond the widespread notion of «drug addiction» because
strictly speaking it applies only to the medical or biological aspects of
drug use being viewed exclusively as a disease without covering social,
legal and some other aspects. This is why the notion «drug abuse» rather
than «drug addiction» is used in juridical literature as a much wider term
covering social, legal and other aspects. So, drug abuse is understood as a
«social phenomenon» which combines such illegal actions as willful
consumption of narcotics, dealing in narcotics illegally, as well as
solicitation to use drugs, creating the conditions for becoming a part of
illegal drug trafficking.
    This definition is acceptable on the whole and may be used as a basis
for describing the phenomenon, yet it fails to cover the biological aspect
and insufficiently expresses the economic, legal and criminological
aspects.
    There is a need for a term that would cover all the aspects of this
negative phenomenon, and of the ways of combating it.
    Social Aspects of Drug Abuse:
    Most concisely, the social aspect of drug abuse can be described as a
combination of social behaviors linked to narcotics and their social
consequences in the form of damage that has been done and can be done to
society.
    The actual negative social manifestations of drug abuse are expressed
in various drug-related actions: cultivation of drug bearing plants,
preparation, acquisition, storage, sale and consumption of narcotics, as
well as persuasion to use narcotics.
    Negative Social Consequences of Drug Abuse:
    The negative social consequences of drug abuse are similar to the
social consequences of crime. They amount to «real harm caused by crime to
social relationships and expressed in the cause-and-effect combination of
criminal behavior and in the direct and indirect, immediate and mediate
negative changes (damage, losses, and other ill effects), ultimately
affecting the social (economic, moral, legal, etc.) Values and also
implying the combination of society's economic and other social hazards
attributed to the effort to combat and to socially prevent crime.
    Proceeding from this definition it is possible to recognize the
negative social consequences of drug abuse. The first is the negative
social changes, such as harm to people's health, the destruction of family
foundations, and a decline in work efficiency. The second is the cost which
society has to pay to overcome these changes. Other changes also include
refusal to work, various antisocial actions, and crime. A closer look at
these negative changes shows that drug addicts are poor workers because of
their ill health, which, in general, makes work impossible for them during
spells of abstinence. Their entire range of interests and thoughts lies in
the desire to find ways of obtaining drugs. The list of negative changes
also includes material damage perpetrated by the drug addicts who are often
the source of transportation accidents and accidents in industry. For
example, 60 billion dollars worth of damage is done annually in the United
States alone. There is also the moral damage resulting from the various
unlawful actions motivated by the desire to find means for buying drugs,
such as the willingness to commit crime for the sake of meeting that
desire. Forgery, embezzlement, abuse of authority and office duties is just
a few. Drug addicts create unbearable conditions for their families by
denying them normal lifestyles and means of existence. They harm their
offspring by upsetting the hereditary stock. Drug addicts undergo physical
and moral degradation and die early. They destroy their own basic moral and
ethical values.
    The Committee of Experts of the World Health Organization determines
the social danger and negative consequences of drug abuse according to the
basic factors and divides them into two main groups: the breach of
relations among drug consumers and the spread of unfavorable consequences
among many people.
    Specific Social Problems of Drug Abuse:
    WHO experts describe the specific social problems caused by drug abuse
as follows: the huge material losses and their consequences in the form of
all kinds of damage done to those who immediately surround drug consumers
(parents, college roommates and so on) and to the society as a whole; the
deterioration of relations with official organizations and institutions,
staff at college and at work etc.; drug consumers' inclination to commit
crimes motivated by the need to have drugs or the means to buy them, and
also the mercenary and violent crimes committed under the influence of
drugs; the additional demand for welfare benefits and medical care for
persons using drugs other than for medicinal purposes and in connection
with this the unnoticed spending both by drug addicts and by society as a
whole; the danger arising from drug addicts as potential conduct of drug
addiction in their immediate surroundings.
    Detailed research however allows for a broader list of specific social
aspects. They include: ideological and cultural, law enforcement, medical
care and preventative medicine, labor and education, family and leisure
time, and material resources. The specific ill effects of narcotics and
their unfavorable social consequences can be seen in any of the categories
listed above. For example, in the ideological and cultural area they
express themselves in the development of a specific drug ideology; in the
law enforcement area there is an increase of crime. In Medicare and
preventive medicine, there is deterioration in people's health and an
increase in the number of handicapped children. In industry and education —
a decline in labor efficiency and poor results at schools and other
educational centers is evident. One can also point to accidents and to
deterioration of relations among staff. In the family relations, a loss of
understanding occurs. All this requires setting up special schools,
preventive centers, drug departments at medical institutions,
rehabilitation centers and new antidrug programs.
    To sum up the above-cited social aspects of drug abuse one may state,
that it is harmful in physical, moral and proprietary ways. This harm is
caused by the proliferation of the narcotic sub-culture as it draws more
victims into it; secondly, by drug-related crimes; thirdly, by crimes
committed for the purpose of getting means for buying more drugs; fourthly,
by crimes committed under the influence of drugs; and, finally, by the
spending needed to carry out various programs aimed at eliminating drug
abuse.
    Legal Aspect of Drug Abuse:
    The legal aspect of drug abuse is also a part of the social aspect.
Crimes and other law-breaking acts covered by the totality of legal norms
involve the illegal cultivation of drug-bearing plants, the preparation,
storage, transportation, trafficking, sales, and theft of drugs, the use of
drugs without doctor's prescription, and the violation of laws regulating
the handling of narcotics. This also covers the situation when suitable
conditions are created for taking drugs and those in which more people are
persuaded to use drugs or when people have to commit crimes in order to
obtain means to buy drugs. Crimes committed under the influence of drugs,
as well as crimes that are committed for the purpose of getting money to
purchase drugs are included as well.
    These crimes should be viewed as part of the notion of drug abuse since
they are caused by the desires of drug users to boost drug-inspired
activities or their level of intoxication. The legal aspect of drug abuse
also includes those relationships regulated by law and arising from the non-
medical use of drugs.
    Criminological Aspect of Drug Abuse:
    The criminological aspect of drug abuse includes a part of this
phenomenon that poses an extreme danger to the public, i.e. is linked to
the above-cited crimes, their state, level, structure, dynamics, cause-and-
effect, criminal's personality, and prevention measures, among others.
    Economic Aspect of Drug Abuse:
    The economic aspect of drug abuse is associated with its affect on
economy, such as large sums of money in possession of drug dealers, a
decline in labor productivity of drug addicts; an increase in spending on
law-enforcement engaged in combating drug-related crimes; and a drain on
national budgets due to preventive and rehabilitation measures to combat
drug addiction. Experts claim, for example, that in the former USSR, the
cost of illegal drug trafficking within the «narco-business-shadow economy»
amounted to billions of troubles.
    Biological Aspect of Drug Abuse:
    The biological aspect of drug abuse is associated with the notion that
it is «a disease manifested by a constant and insurmountable craving for
drugs (morphine, for example) causing euphoria in small doses and stupor in
large ones. The regular use of drugs arouses a desire to increase the dose.
The abstinence syndrome usually accompanies withdrawal.
    Narcotics damage the internal organs of drug takers, destroy their
nervous systems, their state of mind, and bring about their social
degradation.
    Since drug addiction is a disease, there is a need to find a cure for
it. Hence, the need to have qualified medical personnel, special drug
rehabilitation centers and branches offices, effective medicines and
curative methods.
    Ecological Aspect of Drug Abuse:
    The ecological aspect of narcotics is associated, on the one hand, with
the natural existence of drug-bearing plants, and on the other, with their
man-made cultivation. These plants are a source of obtaining and preparing
narcotic substances. From the ecological point of view there is a need,
first, to do away with the spread of wild drug-bearing plants, and second,
to ban their man-made cultivation. The economic, biological and ecological
aspects are subjects for research by experts.
    Drug-related Crimes:
    It is possible to define drug abuse as a negative social phenomenon
touching upon the social, legal, criminological, economic, biological and
ecological areas accordingly. One part of the phenomenon is drug addiction,
as a disease, and other, embraces all the law-breaking actions related to
drugs: those carried out to secure means for purchasing drugs or those
committed under the influence of drugs. Such law-breaking actions cover the
use, preparation, purchase, storage, transportation, parcel mail, sale and
theft of narcotic substances; attempts to force other people to use drugs
and the creation of conditions conducive to such use; attempts to sow and
grow drug-bearing plants; attempts to violate the established rules
regulating the production, purchase, storage, control, sale, transportation
or parcel mail of narcotic substances; and, drug smuggling. The law-
breaking actions also cover various mercenary crimes (violent crime) that
are not drug-related but are committed in order to buy drugs subsequently
(theft, robbery, plunder, fraud, blackmail and others) and also violent
crimes committed under the influence of drugs (e.g., hooliganism against
individuals). This notion reflects the essence and the confines of the drug
use and serves as a guideline for determining its scale and developing
strategies against it. Yet the true scale of this phenomenon is obscured by
a high degree of latent drug-induced diseases and law-breaking drug-related
actions.
                                                        Narcotics and Crime:
    The above-listed law-breaking actions are crimes proving an
interrelation between drug abuse and crime. Drugs and crime are not only
closely interrelated, but actually blend fully, and in fact, becomes what
is known, as narco-crime. But to merely establish this fact is not enough.
The danger drug-related crimes pose to the public surpasses the danger
coming from other crimes. Drug-related crime is largely interrelated with
various other kinds of crime and even merges with one of its most dangerous
varieties such as organized crime. This becomes clear studying the dynamics
of drug-related crimes. Central here are the drug users who represent a
consumer of narcotics, and the ultimate target of drug trafficking — the
sale of drugs. When people become dependent on drugs they concentrate all
their efforts on getting drugs at any cost. They engage in criminal
activities ranging from the cultivation of drug-bearing plants and the
preparation of «stuff», to its sale.
                                                  Tendencies of Development:
    The number of drug users grows in direct proportion to the rise in
crimes committed under the influence of narcotics and, in the long run, to
the profits earned by the drug dealers. Hence, drug dealers seek to 1)
expand the drug sales; 2) increase the output of drugs or receive more of
them from medical and pharmaceutical centers; and, 3) further promote
criminal activities connected to drugs. The latter seems to ensure the
realization of the former. A high degree of organization paves the way for
expanding drug sales, increasing the output and boosting drug trafficking.
                                                       Expanding Drug Sales:
    The expansion of drug sales is achieved by persuading more people to
take drugs. Drug dealers set up drug pads and stores where narcotics are
available. They try to advertise them in indirect ways. They make sure that
more powerful drugs are continuously being developed.
    In order to increase drug output drug-bearing plants are grown on
remote plantations in regions with difficult access. Illegal shops and
laboratories for developing new types of narcotics are set up there. Funds
for increasing drug output are raised by blackmailing or bribing public
officials. Drug-dealers practice violence, make threats against officials
and encourage theft of large amounts of drugs.
    Boosting the Level of Organization of the Illegal Drug Trafficking
Business Methods to improve the level of organization include mergers of
criminal groups and associations, severe disciplinary measures within
criminal organizations, greater degree of cohesion among group members,
conspiratorial rules, and tougher actions against those who violate the
rules in such groups. Other methods are: increasing attempts to draw
government officials into criminal groups, taking control of persons
engaged in drug-related crimes on their own, centralizing finances and
monopolizing drug prices.
    According to various studies there are quite a few syndicates and
cartels in the world that have divided drug trafficking regions among
themselves. Activities of these groups are guided by a clear-cut system of
criminal actions, such as promoting the sowing and cultivation of drug-
bearing plants, the production of narcotics, their wholesale purchase, and
the transportation and sales of drugs to consumers. Drug syndicates and
cartels, for whom drug trafficking is the main source of income, act under
the guise of legitimate companies, trying to come across as legal as
possible. They have airplanes, modern weapons and the newest technology in
their possession. Leaders of the criminal drug associations do their utmost
to oppose the actions of law enforcement agencies. With this purpose in
mind, they not only try to check police actions but make attempts,
successful at times, to infiltrate police ranks. Professional criminals
deploy defense measures that may prove to be so effective in challenging
the worthiness of surveillance of suspects and the bugging of their phones.
United into cartels and syndicates and organizationally divided into groups
and associations, drug- criminals are usually aware that they remain under
constant surveillance. To ensure their personal safety they resort, as a
rule, to various counter-surveillance measures, thus putting well-trained
police officers in a difficult position. Experience shows that criminal
groups usually keep the approaches to places where narcotics are turned
over under their own close watch.
                                              Ways to Legalize Drug Profits:
    Drug dealers seek not only to build up profits from drug trafficking
but to legalize them as well. To that end they engage in criminal
activities where by legal and illegal operations are inextricably
intertwined. The money earned from the trade in narcotics is invested into
legitimate businesses or in real estate. It may also be laundered in
financial transactions, such as, the purchase of shares and securities or
other newly invented and constantly perfected operations. The income thus
obtained allows drug dealers not only to pour more money into drug
trafficking or finance more drug-related crimes but also provides for a
legal coverage of drug trade, or for the participation in legal activities.
Speakers at the international seminar on combating organized crime in the
Russian city of Suzdal in 1992 held in accord with the resolution of the
45th session of the UN General Assembly, pointed out that «in the majority
of countries, organized crime developed along two directions: participating
in prohibited activities (property crimes, money laundering, illegal drug
trafficking, violation of hard currency transaction rules, intimidation,
prostitution, gambling, trade in weapons and antiques) and joining legal
business (directly or using such parasitical means as extortion. This
participation in legal economic activities is always bent for the use of
illegal competition methods and may have a greater economic impact compared
to the involvement in totally illegal kinds of activity). In short,
criminal methods are used in both cases leading to the situation in which
criminal elements form the majority of organized criminal formations.
                                                      Organized Narco-crime:
    Typically, drug cartels and syndicates are highly organized. Present in
the organizations are: strict and precise distribution of functions; very
rigid hierarchies; internal discipline maintained by interest, authority
and force; stringent conspiracy; ramified networks of groups bound by firm
organizational ties; branches existing and functioning in various
countries; contacts with other criminal groups (counterfeiters, smugglers,
murderers etc.); the use of professional criminals; the
internationalization of group members; and, the use of violence to meet the
desired ends. To protect their huge profits and spheres of interest, the
subjects of narco-criminals stop at nothing and employ violent means, such
as the contract murders of their rivals and of law enforcement agents. The
money brought by the trade in drugs is often used to finance dangerous
crimes and acts of terrorism. It becomes a source, which finances
subversive activities of all kinds. Profits obtained from the drug trade
make it possible to finance large-scale armed operations against government
forces (like in Columbia or Mexico). Profit gained from the drug trade is
often compared with the profits earned by whole industries. The drug trade
is regarded as the world's second largest economy. All this enables drug
dealers not only to pay generously for the participation in crimes but also
to set up a common financial fund, a common bank, so to speak. Narco-money
is also used to exert influence on policy-making, particularly, by
nominating the associates of drug dealers to key posts in the economy and
politics or by bribing persons who already hold such posts and turning them
into supporters of the drugs trade. These financial investments are
reinforced by threats of violence against them or their close relatives
(wives, children or parents). This proves convincingly that narco-crime is
a well organized and well planned business incorporating the mutually inter-
related criminal activities of individuals, groups, associations,
syndicates and cartels with a division of mutually interrelated functions.
This is the reason to regard this kind of crime as a variety of organized
crime. Some researchers believe that drug profits are the economic
foundation of organized crime. This can be seen in comparison of elements
forming narco- and organized crimes. To get a clear understanding of the
elements of the latter it is necessary to look in retrospect at the history
of organized crime. While crime and drug addiction have been known to the
world for at least several centuries, the existence of organized crime has
been officially recognized quite recently, only in this century. Yet both
national and foreign researchers date the origin of this phenomenon, in one
way or another, to a much earlier period.
    Various stable criminal organizations used to appear and operate on
territories of almost all modern states. Gangs of brigands and smugglers
were at work not only on land but also at sea (sea pirates). They had in
their possession caches of weapons, stocks of gold and food and, sometimes,
entire fleets of pirate boats furnished with everything necessary for an
attack and ready to go into combat with regular troops or ships. They
thereby challenged borders and laws. Already at that time members of such
gangs observed their own internal rules and traditions strictly, contrary
to the ones obligatory in society. Among them there was the principle of
mutual help, the recognition of the leaders' authority, the distribution of
duties and spoils, as well as a system of reward and punishment. Gangsters
knew exactly the kind of work they were responsible for and also knew their
zones of influence (slave trade, cattle stealing, smuggling arms,
narcotics, gold, diamonds, etc). They talked their own language and stuck
to other conspiratorial rules. Taking hostages and bribing officials were
their usual practices, very much like the actions of the present day
organized crime groups.
    With the passing of time, of course, these organizations kept
transforming and modernizing, adjusting to changes of state borders,
governments and economies. They were turning more and more into organized
criminal associations that posed a serious threat to public safety, to the
supremacy of the law and to other state institutions. As researchers point
out, a particular danger of organized crime is that it becomes more and
more arrogant, aggressive, ingenious and diverse. In the 1980s, organized
crime became increasingly apparent throughout the world.
                                                   Forms of Organized Crime:
    Along with traditional forms of organized crime, new forms, more
diverse and greater in scale, have appeared, such as the theft and re-sale
of luxury cars, electronic equipment, historical and cultural art objects,
antiques, icons and church plate. Other forms include the illegal trade in
human being, weapons and ammunition, strategic raw materials, non-ferrous
and rare metals, drugs counterfeiting, theft and forgery of credit cards,
gambling, and infiltration of legal business and world finance. An analysis
of documents issued by the UN Information Center proves that the influence
of various forms of organized crime spreads far beyond national borders and
«transnationalize crime», so to speak. This creates a situation which
«differs, both qualitatively and quantitatively, from the situation in the
past and hampers the accomplishment of effective measures aiming to prevent
and eliminate crime. Experts believe that the evolution of organized crime
should be seen as «a process providing for a rational reorganization on the
international basis of criminal enterprises using the same patterns just as
it is the case for legal enterprises.» This process reflects tendencies for
forming a more intricate organizational structure typical of the modern
society in all countries. This explains why the UN Secretary General
pointed out in his speech at the 47th General Assembly session on September
28, 1992, that it was imperative to promote international cooperation and
develop practical steps against organized crime in view of its negative
impact on various areas of society's social, political and economic life.
Though extremely topical, problems of organized crime have not yet been
resolved properly by juridical theory and practice. Suffice it to say that
there are still some countries where no laws on organized crime have yet
been passed. There is no uniform approach to the concept of organized crime
at the legislative level. The attributes and signs of this phenomenon have
not yet been finalized. No attempts have yet been made to develop a
comprehensive program of action against it. There are few statistics or
official data on organized crime as a whole.
    For example, in the former USSR the first official mention of organized
crime made at the government level was on December 2, 1989, when the
decision to step up the effort against organized crime was passed by the
2nd Congress of People's Deputies. However, no laws regarding organized
crime have been adopted. This could not help but leave its imprint on the
practical activities of law enforcement agencies in the former Union
republics. There was no solid theoretical discussion of the concept of
organized crime, as the scarce publications of the last few years could
hardly give a complete picture of this problem.
    Some published works, however, contain a number of definitions of
organized crime. Some authors point to the following basic features.
Criminal groups based on hierarchical order consolidate within the borders
of one particular region or a country; their leaders take no part in crimes
but only perform organizational, managerial and ideological functions.
Government officials, including law enforcement officers, become corrupt
and join criminal activities providing safety to the members of criminal
associations. This association has a tendency to monopolize and expand the
spheres of illegal activities, and to protect leaders from bearing any
responsibility. Another group of authors believe that organized crime is a
system of contacts forming naturally in the criminal surroundings which
lead to the concentration and monopolization of certain kinds of criminal
activities. Diversified ties between groups engaged in criminal activities
are characteristic of this system.
                                       About the Concept of Organized Crime:
    Organized crime represents the consolidated criminal associations with
their own norms of behavior, hierarchical ladders and finances, it is the
most dangerous kind of crime that opposes and counteracts the lawful
actions of the state. This definition also embraces the totality of
mercenary and economic crimes committed with the help of corrupt government
officials, and law enforcement agents among them, who yielded to bribery
and other forms of corruption.
                                     Organized Crime in Foreign Legislation:
    In this context it is interesting to look at foreign experience in
dealing with organized crime, particularly, in the field of legislation.
The Italian criminal code states, for example, (article 416-2) that «the
association of a mafia kind is ranked as a criminal one when its members
practice the removal and intimidation of other persons in order to ensure a
cover-up and observe the law of silence and thus make it possible to commit
crimes, and win, directly or indirectly, posts allowing the management or
control of business activities, the distribution of concessions and permits
of all kinds, the signing of contracts, and communal services, as well as
making illegal profits or securing illegal privileges for themselves and
other persons.» The American approach seems to be slightly different. While
the Italian Criminal Code lists features of organized crime, American
Federal Legislation (USC-par. 3781), though naming certain features of
organized crime, attributes concrete actions to it, namely, «unlawful
activities by members of a well-organized and disciplined association
supplying illegal commodities and offering illegal services, which include
but are not limited to, gambling, prostitution, usury, the spread of
narcotics, racket and other unlawful actions by such organizations.»
Organized crime has broad opportunities for carrying out unlawful deeds but
the choice of these opportunities is mainly determined by the level of
expected profit, the minimum degree of possible risk of being caught and
exposed and the absence of concrete victims. It is this particular factor
that comes to the foreground in crimes related to narcotics whose users are
not interested in reporting to the police. The specific choice of a
«specialization» for this or another criminal group is a factor
guaranteeing it, to a large degree, a high level of conspiracy and a free
hand in committing crimes. Along with the previously mentioned
«specialization» of criminal associations there also exists what is termed
as an «internal specialization», i.e. the division of labor among criminal
association members.
                 Organized Crime and Drug Related Crime: Features in Common:
    These features include:
    — clearly defined organizational and managerial structures with a
hierarchy which ensures the protection of leaders from punishment since
their actions usually remain outside the confines of the criminal code;
    — uniform norms of behavior and responsibility;
    — planned unlawful activities and common goals aimed at making large
profits;
    — a system aiming to neutralize all forms of legal control and
development of counter measures;
    — common finances invested in various areas of criminal activities,
which are used for bribing the necessary people, providing material support
to members of criminal associations and financing crimes;
    — monopolization and expansion of areas of criminal activity,
cooperation between criminal associations in various branches of a national
economy, the introduction of commodities and services to the black market,
exploitation of women through pornography, and prostitution;
    — the use of legal methods to launder drug money.
    In sum narcotics are a negative social phenomenon posing an extreme
danger to society. This danger is expressed in such ill-effects as the
destruction of people's health as a result of drug addiction, drug-related
crimes, the totality of which forms an independent crime branch (narco-
crime), and the ability to turn the most dangerous and well-organized part
of narco-crime into a variety of organized crime.
                      Par. 2. Tendencies of Development
    Some tendencies of development can be traced by using the statistical
method, whereas others, which are not clearly evident, can be discovered by
sociological studies, expert evaluations, interviews, studies of documents
or by content analysis of mass media publications.
                                               The Structure of Narco-crime:
    In the structure of narco-crime, the predominant criminal actions are
the illegal preparation, acquisition, storage, transportation and
dissemination of narcotics by mail. The percentage of such crimes is high
and is increasing all the time. It varies between 87 and 96%. Actions not
with the intent to sell constitute an overwhelming share (from 96 to 99%).
    On the one hand, this fact gives reason to assume that the actions
listed above were taken to obtain narcotics for personal use. On the other,
a conclusion can be drawn that the main efforts against the spread of
illegal drug trafficking «have actually shifted towards intensifying
repressive measures against drug users.
    However, illegal activity with drugs and their deliberate sale is much
more intensive. But for various reasons, both objective and subjective,
these fall under a different legal assessment. A major factor is that it is
difficult to prove that there was an intent to sell. This is compounded by
subjective views of «intent to sell» in special situations and the absence
of a clear-cut stand by the lawmakers. 93% of the polled narcotic officers
believe that proving «intent to sell» is difficult especially since this
question is of decisive importance in final judicial rulings.
    Besides, 63% of the respondents charged with illegal drug operations
without the aim of selling drugs, admitted that they not only had such
intent but also had been engaged in these operations on a regular basis all
the way up until they were arrested.
    It is interesting to note that in police seizures, drugs obtained from
natural plants have prevailed so far. (Nearly 9/10ths). Today the amount of
seized raw materials for making drugs is estimated in tens of tons and has
grown more than 5 times in the last few years. This is well above even the
over-estimated needs and norms of known addicts.
    Specialized studies on the subject underline how difficult it is to
investigate and uncover the above-mentioned crimes because of «the
ingenuity of methods used to carry them out, attempts to conceal them and
also because criminal behavior is multifaceted.
    One should also take into account the absence of well-conceived
methods, and the shortage of professionally trained personnel to uncover
and investigate such crimes, especially, in the present-day conditions when
there are political collisions caused by the Soviet Union's disintegration,
when there are «transparent» and ill-defined borders between the former
sovereign Soviet republics, when the internal affairs agencies are not well
equipped technically, and when the customs and border control services are
vulnerable.
                                         The Structure of Crime and Latency:
    Among the registered crimes there are none related to violations within
the system of medical care of the rules of drug-making, drug acquisition,
storage, keeping stock of, dispensing, transporting or sending by mail, at
pharmaceutical factories or medical and bio industrial enterprises, etc.
The absence of information about drug-related crimes, however, does not
mean at all that there are no crimes present.
    A study of the problem has shown that there is no reason to believe
narcotics are safely kept out of reach of addicts. This has been confirmed
by more than one-third of the polled officers of internal affairs agencies.
Every second drug taker who was forced to undergo treatment, did not deny
that he had received drugs from medical personnel. Similar cases of drug
acquisition were noted by over 10% of persons charged with drug-related
crimes, whereas 17% of people from the same group of drug abusers confessed
that they used to steal drugs from hospitals, small medical centers and
pharmacies. The share of other crimes in the structure of drug-related
crimes total is insignificant, though they play a rather negative role in
the spread of narcotics. For example, during one year, the crime of
solicitation to use drugs was recorded only once or twice and 3 or 8 times
the crimes involving the organization or running dens for addicts or
providing premises for that purpose.
    All the same just over 98% of the polled people charged with drug abuse
and intent to sell drugs said they had persuaded 3 to 7 persons to start
using drugs. In more than 70% of such cases, a special effort was made to
invite potential «victims» to homes belonging to different persons. These
people received remuneration for granting premises especially arranged for
this purpose and where conditions were conducive for the use of narcotics.
Practically one out of every 4 persons charged with drug abuse but without
attempting to push drugs, admitted in talking to officials, that he had
persuaded at least 3 or 4 persons to use drugs treating them to narcotics
that he had bought or made for his own use.
    What is more, 37% of the examined complaints and statements by citizens
addressed to various agencies, especially, those made directly to the local
police officers have remained unread, though they specifically mentioned
people who had turned their homes into drug pads.
                                                        Negative Tendencies:
    All these facts highlight: 1) an increase of the degree in danger posed
to the public by drug-related crimes; 2) the appearance of new narcotics,
giving way to diversity of drugs; 3) increase in the number of people
involved in the use of narcotics through persuasion; 4) the rising level of
organization of such crimes; 5) the expanding boundaries of illegal drug
trafficking on the world- wide scale; 6) an increase in the number of
illegal labs used to make drugs; 7) the perfection of methods used for
selling drugs and an increase in the establishment of illegal and semi-
legal shops intended for selling drugs; 8) the rising number of cases of
illegal acquisition, including theft of narcotics from medical
institutions; 9) the increase in numbers of corrupt officials involved in
illegal drug trafficking; 10) the greater degree of masked laundering of
money; 12) and a higher degree of latency of drug-related crimes.
    The danger to the public from drug-related crimes is manifested by an
increase of crimes committed for the sake of selling drugs, and, second, by
the total quantity of narcotics in circulation.
    The appearance new drug substances and the corresponding rise in
variety of drugs is reflected in the constant growth of the List of
Narcotics (narcotic substances and drug medicines both synthetic and
natural) produced by the UN International Drug Control Committee.
    The spreading of the cultivation of drug-bearing plants in places,
which are, difficult to physically access is confirmed by the discovery of
plantations sown with such plants in various regions of the world. These
discoveries have been made with the help of space and aerial photography.
    The fact that the ever-larger number of people use narcotics is
manifested in the rising figure of medical patients using drugs and
recreational drug users. The growing number of drug patients is registered
by statistics and the rise in numbers of recreational drug users is evident
from opinion polls among experts (medics at outpatient clinics for addicts
and law enforcement officers who specialize in combating drug-related
crimes).
    The greater degree of organization in drug-related crimes is manifested
by the growth of criminal groups and associations, in the setting up of
syndicates and cartels, in the toughening of discipline within syndicates
and cartels and in the rising cohesion of their members and the
coordination of their actions. Tougher methods of pressure are exerted on
members violating the rules of conduct within groups. Criminal groups,
associations, syndicates, and cartels are also placed under control along
with the people who commit drug related crimes on their own.
    The expanding boundaries of illegal drug trafficking on the
international scale are evident in the fact that drugs are smuggled into
practically all the countries of the world. This smuggling includes
attempts to carry drug consignments through the customs and across national
borders of a number of countries by various means and by different kinds of
transportation. This has been established by controlling deliveries of
narcotics and by polling experts (law-enforcement and customs officers).
    Law-enforcement agencies in various countries discovered the rise in
the number of drug-making labs and new methods of selling and circulating
drugs. Shops that were camouflaged as book or perfume stores have been
seized.
                              Corruption – as a Way to Protect Drug Dealers:
    Growing number of corrupt officials, aspiring for higher posts tend to
improve methods to protect persons taking part in illegal drug trafficking.
Polled experts and narcotic squad police officers, admitted that over the
last few years, there was a rise in the number of requests to them by high
ranking officials suggesting that criminal responsibility be lifted from
persons involved in drug deals and against whom suits had been filed.
    Ever more sophisticated methods to legalize the money from drug
trafficking is manifested by laundering such money which makes it
difficult, impossible at times, to trace its primary source. At present one
can speak of the three major methods. First, cash is put into financial
institutions or into retail trade and is immediately converted into foreign
currencies or transferred abroad. Second, there is a stratification of the
money, i.e. increasing the number of transactions that are often carried
out in several countries to obscure the source of the illegally earned
money. And, third, illegal earnings are integrated into investments in
economic operations with the aim of making the money look legal.
    The polled experts, and the narcotic police squad officers explained
the increased latency of drug-related crimes by the following examples.
There is mutual interest in keeping crimes a secret both among drug-pushers
and addicts; none of them have any desire to cooperate with the law-
enforcement agencies. There are special mutually beneficial and inter-
dependent relations between users and suppliers of narcotics. This kind of
relationship requires thorough secrecy due to the fear of criminal
punishment for both users and suppliers. Small wonder that the addicts
taken to hospitals, often in critical conditions, dangerous to their life
and health, do not reveal, as a rule, the source of getting drugs. And this
silence is due not to some sort of moral principles, honor, duty or
solidarity but rather, in most cases, to the fear of losing the already
established drug source or to the fear of being victimized for revealing
the source. Also much is yet to be done to develop proper legal, personnel,
tactical, material and technical programs that are effective in combating
drug trade. There is the obvious need to find a way to expose latent drug-
related crimes. For without realizing the actual state of affairs with drug-
related crimes, adequate measures of combating them will remain
insufficient.
  Chapter II. System and Classification of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse
              Par. 1. System of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse
    Drug abuse is a socially dangerous and complicated phenomenon. Narco-
crime, particularly, should be countered by a rigid system of measures.
    These combine numerous and diversified steps having social, legal,
criminological, economic, ecological, organizational and international
aspects. The word system is understood as «a whole consisting of parts, a
combination; …a great number of elements bearing a relation to each
other, connected with each other, forming a sort of integrity or unity.
    The system of measures for overcoming drug abuse is comprised of many
steps bearing relation to each other.
                                  System of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    The diversity of such measures, their relationships and contacts can be
illustrated by law practices, law-making and law enforcement, as well as by
the crime prevention theories both on domestic and international scales.
For example, a comprehensive inter-disciplinary action program to prevent
the spread of drug addiction submitted for discussion at the international
antidrug conference in Vienna in July 1987 contained more than 400 articles
and recommendations to governments and organizations as to how this
negative phenomenon should be overcome.
    The UN international program for combating drugs for the years 1994 and
1995, 1995 and 1996 comprises 298 projects featuring various aspects,
directions and measures for checking the spread of drugs. 216 out of them
were carried through in 1994 and 1995 and the implementation of the
remaining 82 projects is underway. The total dollar amount of resources
mobilized for the fulfillment of these projects is estimated at US$
484,397,800. The sum was allocated by the UN International Antidrug
Program's Fund.
    The Concept of the Russian Federation government's policy on drug
control, endorsed by decision No 5494 of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian
Federation on July 22nd 1993, incorporates quite a few antidrug measures
from those developed by the world community and registered by international
conventions and in other documents. This Concept emphasizes the measures
that have been tested and are successfully utilized.
    Since the system of measures against drug abuse is too complicated the
discussion of its contents is related, firstly, to the general
characterization of its components and, secondly, to the classification of
these measures in their relation to each other.
Basic Aspects of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    The measures against drug abuse have some social, legal,
criminological, medical, biological, political, economic, ecological,
organizational and international aspects. Although these aspects have
different spheres of application, they still remain interrelated. For
example, measures for curing drug addicts have medical, social and legal
aspects to them; measures for combating drug-related crimes have legal,
criminological, social and other aspects; measures for combating money
laundering have legal, social, economic, international and other aspects
and so on. So, each particular aspect can be discussed only in abstract
terms. This approach to the definition and description of aspects makes it
possible to give a full characterization of the system of measures against
drug abuse.
                                                           Social Dimension:
    The social dimension is the cornerstone of all other aspects. All the
antidrug measures are permeated with it. There is a correlation between the
social aspect and each of the other aspects. It is either a general element
in relation to something specific such as medical measures, or the whole of
something, which represents a part such as criminological measures. It can
also be a content when the other represents a form, as in legal measures.
In short, the social aspect can be regarded as a common for all antidrug
measures. Additionally there are legal measures for making those involved
in drug-related crimes answerable for their actions and for intensifying
the customs' control over the shipment of drugs across borders.
                                                            Legal Dimension:
    The legal aspect of the measures under consideration can be seen as a
totality of legal norms including international conventions against drugs
and determining the degree of a judicial responsibility for them, mainly,
criminal and administrative; secondly, regulating various legal
relationships arising from drug use, thirdly, ensuring a compulsory
treatment for drug addicts who try to avoid it and, fourthly, referring to
these or other substances as narcotics.
                                                   Criminological Dimension:
    The criminological aspect comprises measures aiming to overcome narco-
crime, as a totality of drug-related crimes. These measures aim to study,
analyze and sum up the structure and dynamics of these crimes and their
latency. In addition, they aim to establish the causal complex of the given
crime and determine the content, nature and direction of actions aimed at
removing or neutralizing the causes conducive to the commitment of drug-
related crimes. Thirdly, they aim to disclose and fix typical features,
traits and qualities of an individual guilty of committing this or that
crime. Lastly, they aim to develop methods for preventing drug-related
crimes.
                                                          Medical Dimension:
    The medical (biological) aspect involves the improvement of
narcological aid and methods for curing drug addicts, the need to increase
the level of professional medical training for those engaged in treating
addicts and persons taking drugs without a doctor's prescription and the
development of new medicines and medical equipment for treating addicts.
                                                        Political Dimension:
    The political aspect involves combating narco-business, which tries to
undermine the foundations of state power, weaken the entire machinery of
state and diminish the nation's trust in the government.
    Some juridical works make it a point that organized crime opposes legal
actions of top government bodies not only by committing crimes but also by
bending administration officials to the will of criminal associations so
that they could protect criminal activities.
    The resistance of narco-business to government lawful actions can
result in attempts to undermine the foundations of state and in the re-
orientation and distortion of any country's policy. So, central to the
political aspect of measures against narco-business is blocking the
influence of drug dealers on the national policy by barring nomination of
corrupt officials to key posts in the government.
                                                         Economic Dimension:
    There are two facets- retrospective and perspective of the economic
aspect of measures against drug abuse. The retrospective facet, on the one
hand, involves direct expenses of the state to combat narcotics, and, on
the other, the lost benefits to citizens as a result of the spread of drug
addiction.
    Direct expenses include sizeable resources taken out from the state
budget to set up and maintain various medical and educational centers for
handicapped children, including those who inherited health problems from
their parents suffering from drug addiction. In addition this includes
expenses to support internal affairs agencies, customs officers engaged in
combating the proliferation of drugs, production of special equipment for
identifying drugs, as well as production of medicines for drug users.
Finally, the direct expenses are used to promote international cooperation
in joint antidrug actions with the United Nations Organization, Interpol
and other international agencies and carry out research in the field of
medicine, psychiatry, psychology and law, and to conduct an antidrug
education.
    The cost to society is revealed in an increase in the number of
physically handicapped and mentally retarded people, victims of narcotics.
In the long run this leads to a curtailment of society's physical and
intellectual potential as a whole, such as lower standards in education and
labor productivity. This, in turn, causes a reduction in the amount of
material and other benefits produced by society and of resources for
various government-run programs. There is also an increase in the number of
cases of accidents in industry and, as a consequence the increasing failure
to meet the output targets.
    It is therefore essential to develop economic levers to oppose narco-
business, including the money laundering. This has been poorly done so far,
as no economic measures for combating narcotics have been developed and
applied in practice. These tasks require an independent study by economists
and lawyers.
                                                       Ecological Dimension:
    The ecological dimension of measures against drug abuse is linked to
the legal regulation that puts restrictions on the preservation and
dissemination of drug-bearing plants. This amounts to a ban on their
cultivation and destruction of the fields without any damage to the
environment. The cultivation of such plants is expected to be limited to
specially allotted areas where drug-bearing plants can be sown for medical
purposes only.
    International Dimention:
    The international dimention of measures against drug abuse is
manifested in various legislative, and law enforcement measures at the
international level.
    In sum, this system of measures covers a totality of numerous, diverse,
complementary and carefully outlined programs that have social, legal,
criminological, medical, economic, ecological, organizational and
international dimensions.
          Par. 2. Classification of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse
    The essence of the system of measures to overcome drug abuse can be
understood by their classification in view of the diversity of these
measures. By establishing their different categories and distributing them
into various groups, this classification would make it possible to give
each measure its own niche, to define its boundaries and its relationship
to other measures. This classification makes it possible to determine the
degree of each measure's significance and its priority in terms of its
practical implementation.
    It is important to group them by contents, form, level, subject of
application, and type. As for legal measures, they should be grouped in
accordance with different branches of law.
The Content of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    The measures to overcome drug abuse carried out by the UN Commission on
Drugs of the UN Economic and Social Council, by the UN International
Committee on Drug Control and by other international agencies can be
grouped into the following categories: analytical, organizational, training
and educational, research, technical, medical, economic, financial,
international law, preventive, monitoring, legislative, and criminal.
    Analytical component is needed in order to be able to make use of a
complex system of collecting and assessing data about drug abuse, to
evaluate the extent of the illegal use of drugs in different countries
worldwide, and to make data available on the seizure of large quantities of
narcotics to interested parties.
    Organizational component of measures is aimed at setting up
international agencies to control drugs and to combat drug trade; assisting
countries in developing national policies on such control; supporting
projects, promoting national law enforcement agencies; defining direction
of programs and ensuring the organizational backing of such programs;
estimating the amount of illegal cultivation of drug-bearing plants in
areas difficult and dangerous to access. Governmental measures should
include adoption and fulfillment of national programs to overcome drug
abuse by forming special law-enforcement, medical and other institutions,
as well as special services and squads to combat drug trade; taking stock
of lands used to cultivate drug-bearing plants; arranging control over the
production, storage, consumption, an shipments of drugs, especially across
national borders, as well as over the actions for pharmaceutical and
medical centers.
    The training and educational component includes educating specialists
in law-enforcement agencies, mass media, narcological centers, and social
services.
    The research component aims to define and analyze data on drug abuse,
to work out recommendations for overcoming it, to set up and run special
research labs, and to find new ways of ending drug addiction.
    The technical component includes identifying drugs, designing equipment
for special labs, developing remote control devices to spot fields of drug-
bearing crops.
    The medical component of measures is: to promote a system of
rehabilitative treatment for drug users; to choose appropriate curative
programs; and work on methods to reduce the spread of infectious diseases
among drug users.
    The economic component consists chiefly in funding various programs and
projects, combating drug abuse, supporting programs reducing demand for
drugs and their supply, encouraging and supporting populations which had
switched to cultivating farm crops on territories where drug-bearing plants
had been grown previously.
    The financial component involves measures against money laundering.
Financial operations by drug moguls aimed at making their earnings legal
are the most vulnerable part for the criminals. In view of this, the
Committee for Banking Rules and Banking Supervision issued a statement on
December 12th, 1988 that calls for preventing criminal uses of the banking
system for laundering cash obtained from drug trafficking. It requires that
the international banking community use extreme discretion while
identifying clients. The statement also calls for more cooperation with
judicial systems and police institutions in halting the legalization of
cash from drug trafficking. Many countries have accepted that the
principles contained in this statement are applicable to the operation of
their own financial systems. In keeping with a decision of the G Seven
countries and of the European Commission Chairman at the 15th economic
summit in Paris in July 1989, a special operational group on financial
issues was started. It produced 40 recommendations made public in February
1990. It also analyzed world financial flows, banking and financial systems
and methods for laundering cash. The group found some weak spots and
undertook a number of other steps. All the countries, who are members of
this group and (in keeping with its recommendations) some other countries
declared that they viewed participation in laundering cash as a criminal
act and started special services to investigate leads on shady deals
reported by subunits of the financial system. At the recommendation of the
special operational group on finances, the UN International Committee on
Drug Control called on all governments to pass and effectively use
appropriate legislative acts to stop money laundering, to confiscate the
property of drug dealers, and to consider a possibility of lifting the
burden of proving the legitimacy of supposed incomes or of other property
subject to confiscation under par. 7 of Article 5 of the 1988 Convention
even if this may require legal or constitutional amendments.
    Among the international law components of measures are those calling
for reciprocal legal support of countries working to combat drug
trafficking. It is essential to make extradition easier, to strengthen
international cooperation against illegal drug trafficking, as well as to
promote the international system of control over medicinal drugs and
psychotropes.
    The preventive measures are comprised of destroying illegal plantations
of drug-bearing crops; preventing a transfer of drugs and of their
components from the legal sphere to the illegal one; curbing illegal drug
trafficking; reducing the demand for drugs; preventing the use of
narcotics, particularly, in places of employment, eliminating the addicts'
pads, illegal labs where narcotics are made and stores which sell them;
promoting social rehabilitation of drug addicts and encouraging education
campaigns against drugs.
    The control component of measures envisages supervision over the
following areas: the growing of drug-bearing plants, to rule out a
«leakage» of the legitimately grown plants: illegal sowing and raising;
production of narcotics, their acquisition, storage, stocking and
dispensing; commercial trade turnover in special equipment used for
producing drugs, as well as in raw materials; semi-finished products,
chemicals and narcotic analogies; international parcel post deliveries as a
vehicle for sending narcotics; ships sailing on the high seas and planes
flying in international space; transit through customs' ports; approaches
to land, sea and air borders; and deliveries of drugs for treatments at
hospitals.
    The most important law-making measure is that of bringing national
legislation in line with international conventions on narco-business.
    The common criminal measures are those applied in every country, as
criminal responsibility for illegal drug trafficking, sowing and raising
drug-bearing plants as well as for other socially dangerous actions related
to drugs. These measures cover both punishments for the above-listed crimes
and also confiscation of tools and of income earned from the illegal drug
trafficking.
    Other measures include improving judiciary and legal systems such as
law-enforcement bodies, courts of law, penitentiary and post penitentiary
programs, customs and education.
                                   Forms of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    The classification of measures to overcome drug abuse can be subdivided
into two groups: those having legal form and those that do not, i.e. those
which are regulated and unregulated by the law accordingly.
                       Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse Regulated by the Law:
    The legal measures against drug abuse include compulsory educational;
compulsory medical; preventive- repressive; repressive; those ensuring
active participation of citizens in combating crimes, in preventing and
curbing them; as well as procedural and organizational managerial. The
compulsory medical, preventive repressive and repressive measures are those
aimed at suppressing drug abuse and the compulsory educational-at
preventing it.
    Organizational managerial measures on the basis of administrative legal
norms, determine in general terms, the status of curative educational and
curative labor centers providing treatments to drug addicts, and the
competence of law-enforcement agencies and of the court regarding the
compulsory placing of drug addicts for treatment. In addition, there are
also measures, containing the following provisions: to build up, on the
national scale, a network of bodies and institutions whose functions will
amount to combating drug-related crimes; to record the number of addicts
and provide treatments to them; to promote departmental cooperation in the
work of combating narcotics; many organizational managerial measures are
specified by international law, registered in conventions, agreements,
treaties and other documents.
                     Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse Unregulated by the Law:
    The second group of measures to overcome drug abuse are those which are
not regulated by the law. They are informational, analytical,
organizational, educational, scientific, technological, medical and
preventive, as well as other measures that bear no relation to compulsion.
    It is the group of legal measures, which can be subdivided into law
branches. Such norms, as suggested above, can be found in the civil,
family, labor, administrative, and criminal codes.
                                 The Level of Measures to Combat Drug Abuse:
    Measures to combat drug abuse can be divided into the following four
levels: international, social, special and individual.
    Measures at the international level are applied by various countries
throughout the world. They are particularly binding in the countries, which
have joined international treaties by ratifying them. This category of
measures may include any of the previously listed such as informational,
analytical, research, technical, medical, economical, financial,
preventive, control, and law-making.
    Social measures are those used on a national scale and meant to
influence society as a whole. They include preventive, law-making, criminal
and other legal measures, as well as the ones embracing the entire society
such as informational, analytical, organizational, managerial, medical,
economical, and others.
    Special measures aim to overcome drug abuse and influence, on the one
hand, certain kinds of harmful activities linked to drugs, and on the
other, restrain persons inclined to carry out such activities or drug
addicts. Measures aimed against certain kinds of activities include, for
example, actions to destroy illegally sown crops or wild drug-bearing
plants, may include measures in regard to specific individuals, attempts to
cure drug addicts; to reveal and record the names of people inclined to
commit drug-related crimes, or persons already convicted for such crimes;
to prevent such people from committing more crimes; and to help persons
from high risk groups avoid situations which may induce drug use.
    Measures in regard to individuals cover steps taken in relation to
those persons who use drugs or those who have committed or tend to commit
crimes or other law-breaking acts involving drugs. They include steps
providing drug addicts with an opportunity to undergo treatment or making
them, if necessary, to undergo treatment, instituting criminal proceedings
or using administrative measures against persons who have committed crimes,
as well as preventing or warding off potentially socially dangerous actions
involving drugs, etc. Medical, preventive, administrative, legal, criminal,
criminal procedural and criminal executive measures can also be seen as
measures in regard to individuals.
                            The Subjects of Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    The measures to overcome drug abuse can be grouped by institutions
implementing them. There are international agencies and organizations,
medical institutions, law-making bodies, law-enforcement agencies,
executive government branches, specially created agencies, groups and other
organizations.
    The Commission on Narcotics of the UN Economic and Social Council and
the UN International Committee on Drug Control are permanently functioning
international agencies. Various conferences and symposia on actions against
drug abuse discussed and worked out conventions, programs, decisions,
projects, and recommendations. These can be referred to as temporarily
operating organizations. Conferences of member-states, i.e. of their
official representatives, have the right to approve conventions and other
normative documents subsequently ranked as international law acts. After
their ratification, legal norms contained in them become part of national
legislation. International bodies exercise all the above-listed measures to
combat drug abuse, except for criminal measures and a few others.
    Medical institutions have the authority to carry out curative and
curative preventive measures.
    By their nature, the measures to overcome drug addiction can be divided
into suppressive and preventive.
    This classification makes it possible to determine the importance of
each particular group. It can also serve as the basis for building a system
of measures to be used for the preparation and subsequent development of
the national program of action to combat drug addiction.
                                            Measures to Overcome Drug Abuse:
    By evaluating the measures to overcome drug abuse from the study of the
experience, it is possible to single out the following groups of measures:
1) control preventive; 2) research, training and educational; 3) medical;
4) legal; 5) economic and financial, and 6) organizational.
    The control and preventive; research, training and educational;
economic and financial measures are grouped together because they are
closely intertwined. Legal measures in this national program should include
law enforcement and law-making measures and organizational measures-
informational, analytical, and technical measures.
    Without referring to the contents once again it would be important,
from the standpoint of their expression and place in this program, to draw
attention to some points concerning certain groups of the proposed
measures.
    A method should be defined in this anti-drug program of applying
control measures. It would need to be a legislative regulation of drug
movements from the sowing of drug-bearing plants and their cultivation, to
the consumption of drugs. Presently, conflicting rules regulating the
production, acquisition, storage, stock taking, dispensing, transportation
and the sending of narcotics by parcel post are in force. These rules were
enacted by executive branch agencies rather than by lawmakers. For example,
the rules concerning the production, storage, stock-taking, and dispensing
of drugs were established by the orders issued by the Ministry of Health,
and the Ministry of the Medical and Micro- biological Industry of the
former USSR. Transportation rules can be found in orders issued by the
Ministry of the Medical Industry and coordinated with the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the former USSR. Rules for sending and shipping drugs
by rail or any other kind of transport were determined by normative acts of
various agencies. On the other hand, even if this is the prerogative of law-
 makers, the rules are scattered within various and quite numerous
normative acts making it difficult to control violations of these rules by
law-enforcement agencies. So, if a full and effective control over the
circulation of narcotics is to be ensured, uniform rules for handling drugs
should be worked out on the basis of the existing rules and should be made
into law. These rules should envisage the procedures for the sowing,
raising, producing, storing, stock-taking, dispensing and selling of drugs
and for the acquiring, sending by parcel post, and carrying of drugs and
their analogies, as well as raw materials, semi-finished products,
chemicals and special equipment used in making drugs across national
borders.
    To implement research, training and educational measures in a national
program it is essential to set up a single research and study center
consisting of facilities capable to perform specific tasks of dealing with
drug addiction. These tasks should be defined in the national program
without overstepping their limits, so as not to squander means and
resources on meeting other goals. For example, the tasks of the research
facility should be to identify drugs, establish new types of drugs and
study the most pressing problems of efforts aimed at stopping drug
addiction. There is a need to establish how money obtained from the
narcotics trade is laundered and determine methods for halting this
process; a need to develop methods for examining controlled deliveries,
documenting them and obtaining evidence which could determine guilt of the
involved parties. The research center could work out methods for carrying
out searches and other actions to uncover illegal drug operations and
actions of those guilty, including sponsors, leaders and members of
organized crime groups. The research center could summarize international
experience in combating drug addiction, including school and out-of-school
psycho preventive education for minors, preventive measures among
population groups considered to be at a risk, and educational and
preventive activity by means of mass media.
    Special attention should be paid to law-making measures devoted to
combating drug addiction. It is expedient to include in the national
program provisions regulating legal drug turnover, regulations for the
treatment, and rehabilitation of drug addicts. It is necessary to develop
and pass the law on the responsibility for laundering drug money ensure and
to treatment of drug patients grown drug-bearing plants for personal use at
therapy centers or narcological hospitals, who have made, bought or kept
drugs or have sown without selling them, rather than making them face
criminal responsibility.
    Economic and financial measures in the national program should provide
for funding to actually put this program into effect. It should also ensure
the functioning of the law-enforcement agencies engaged in the anti-drug
programs, of narcological institutions and drug control services, as well
as support for persons who use fields where drug-bearing crops had been
cultivated earlier but later destroyed. Also the program should develop
provisions about the application of financial measures against the
laundering of drug money.
    When it comes to organizational measures, it would be expedient to
single out purely organizational and also informational, analytical, and
material- technical ones.
    It seems that priorities of the program should be to strengthen
subunits of the law enforcement agencies, and of narcological centers,
specializing in programs against drug abuse; to set up drug control
agencies, encourage anti-drug programs by the greatest number of agencies,
organizations, and mass media. The priority is promoting cooperation
between all agencies and organizations engaged in combating drug abuse; in
establishing a research center for studying problems of combating drug
addiction, in training and up-grading the qualifications of specialists,
expected to work in their field; and in setting up a data bank on drug
addiction.
    All of the above listed informational, analytical and technical
measures should be included in the national program to combat drug
addiction in the Russian Federation. A special fund needs to be started to
support such projects as building medical institutions, a study center, and
the law enforcement agencies furnished with the most modern equipment.
    This system of measures to combat drug abuse examined here with the
ranking of these measures, will make it possible to set specific deadlines
for putting stipulated provisions into practice and will define the
responsibility for their implementation, if this system becomes a part of
the national program. The time frame for the implementation of this
extensive program should be no less than 3 years with annual reports from
all those involved. This will help ensure a more effective realization of
all its provisions.
    This system and the classification of measures against drug abuse
indicate how difficult and complicated the job of combating drugs is. It
calls for much effort, constant improvement and a considerable resources.
              Chapter III. Drug Abuse in the International Law
             Par. 1. International Fora and Legal Acts on Drugs
    Legal measures figure prominently in the system of actions aiming to
combat drugs. It is precisely the legal acts that determine the object, the
subject of narco-crime and influence the shaping of measures of preventive-
educational and curative interference, as well as the range of drug-related
actions, considered dangerous to the public.
    Measures against drug abuse rest, first and foremost, on a number of
international law acts ratified by the Supreme Soviet of the former USSR.
These acts have different names: treaty, pact, convention, agreement,
protocol, declaration and so on. From the juridical point of view, the
difference in names is of no principal importance. No clear-cut criterion
for the use of these names has been worked out in international practice.
In each particular case, this question is resolved by the parties
(countries) to negotiations, who agree on the definition of relations
between them in this or another special field.
    Actions against drug abuse are regulated by international law because
they involve international relations, as they touch upon the interests of
not one but, sometimes, of many countries. As for narco-crimes, they
encroach upon the international cooperation, violate human rights, and
state interests.
    All crimes bearing international nature and coming under the norms of
international criminal law, can be divided into two groups by the degree of
their danger to the public, and the forms of manifestation: crimes of
international character.
    International crimes are those posing the biggest threat to the
development of peaceful relations and cooperation between nations
regardless of their social, political and government systems. They include
heinous crimes against peace and security of the mankind, such as
aggression, genocide, biocide, ecocide or apartheid.
    Crimes of International Character:
Crimes of international character are defined as those covered by the
international law but not belonging to the category of crimes against peace
and security of mankind, rather those infringing upon normal relations
between countries and damaging their peaceful cooperation in various
fields, as well as infringing upon relations between organizations and
citizens. These crimes are much less dangerous and are hard to compare to
crimes against the peace and security of mankind. They are punishable «in
accordance with the norms covered by the international agreements
(conventions), ratified in the proper order, or by the national criminal
codes which conform to these agreements.»
    Various areas of inter-state relations are the objects of crimes of
international character. This factor makes it possible to divide these
crimes into four rather relative sub-divisions:
    1) Crimes that infringe upon the peaceful cooperation and normal
conduct of international relations (terrorism, hijacking and other crimes);
    2) Crimes that damage in a variety of norms international economic,
social and cultural development, such as smuggling, illegal emigration,
counterfeiting and dissemination of narcotics through illegal trade;
    3) Crimes that against property, moral values, and rights of
individuals, such as trafficking, piracy, pornography and other crimes
covered by international conventions and agreements;
    4) Other crimes of international character, such as crimes committed on
board of aircraft, damage to underwater cables, collision of ships and the
failure to provide help at sea etc.
    This classification rules out an identical approach to crimes that are
crimes against humanity, and crimes that are of international character.
This classification allows to examine them in conformity with the set of
laws they infringe upon and in conformity with the extent of harm they do
to international relations. Moreover, this classification largely helps
prevent any broader interpretation of the notion of international crimes.
    The categories — listed above of these are not something permanent, as
these crimes are of the changeable and dynamic nature. The extent of danger
they pose can move them from one category to another. At present any crimes
encroaching upon the vital interests of all nations and countries can be
considered as international crime or crime of international character.
    Virtually all countries recognize the need to combat international
crimes and crimes of international character, including the illegal
dissemination of and trade with narcotics. The binding nature of this
effort stems from the universally recognized principles of international
law, including the international duty of all countries to maintain peace
and promote security of all nations, as well as to hold persons guilty of
committing crimes against the peace and security of mankind and other
crimes of international character accountable for their actions.
    All international legal acts against drug abuse can be divided into
general and specific. General acts regulate various types of international
relations, particularly, those formed in connection with actions against
international crimes and crimes of international character, including the
dissemination of and trade with drugs. Specific acts of international law
bear direct relation to actions against drug abuse and its most dangerous
aspect- narco-crime.
    General Acts of International Law:
General acts of international law lay the legal foundation for cooperation
among nations, in actions against international crimes and crimes of
international character, the dissemination of narcotics among others. One
of these acts is the UN Charter. Its Preamble urges all UN members to join
in a common effort to maintain international peace and security. The UN
Charter stresses the need to use international machinery for promoting the
nations' economic and social progress and sets the goal «to practice
international cooperation in resolving international problems of economic,
social, cultural and humanitarian nature and in encouraging and promoting
respect for human rights and basic freedoms for all regardless of race,
sex, language and religion»
    The UN Charter (part 2 art. 2) also calls on nations to strictly and
unswervingly observe international commitments that they have taken upon
themselves voluntarily and among them, as the Preamble points out, to the
commitments stemming from treaties, agreements and other sources of
international law.
    One of the major historically evolved principles of international law
states that international agreements must be observed. Stemming from this
principle is a member nation's duty to cooperate in combating crime,
international crimes and crimes of international character, including the
dissemination of and trade with narcotics.
    These crimes have certain particularities. This has a bearing on the
question of accountability if such crimes are committed. According to I.I.
Karpets, there is a need to single out crimes covered by conventions or
other signed and ratified international agreements, especially, if national
legislation have been brought in accord with them. The existence of both is
a good reason for making those guilty of committing these crimes to be held
accountable. A failure to do so must be qualified as a violation of both
international law and national legislation.
    In case there are no coordinated norms of accountability, the involved
countries should proceed from the general principles that had developed
among nations and resolve questions of cooperation against crime on that
basis. Specifically, they may determine the forms of this cooperation, its
confines, the need to institute criminal proceedings in view of the
committed crimes of international character, etc.
    Special Acts of International Law:
Special norms of international law dealing with measures to combat drug
abuse have been taking shape gradually. The history of their development is
uneven- from establishing international control over the lawful
distribution and use of drugs to introducing control over illegal drug
trafficking.
    It is not accidental that crimes bearing on drug abuse are qualified as
crimes of international character. This can be attributed to a number of
circumstances.
    As an age-old phenomenon, drug addiction has spread over large
territories. As it kept crossing national borders, whole areas appeared
that specialized in growing and processing drug-bearing plants,
manufacturing and distributing narcotics. Recently, areas where drug money
can be laundered at a profit have emerged. In short, drug addiction has
become widespread practically on all the continents. Drug abuse has
acquired a transnational nature. At the turn of last century it had already
been clear that drug addiction endangered not only the lives of individuals
and social groups but also the economic advancement of many countries, as
it is bound to inflict considerable damage on agriculture and trade and
undermine whole industries. (chemical, pharmaceutical or pharmacological).
    Measures that various governments tried to employ within their
countries in the hope to «curb» drug addiction, so to speak, and ban, say,
in Turkey or China, the non-medicinal use of drugs, failed to bring any
positive results.
    On top of that, programs against drug addiction required additional
financial resources for treatment and social rehabilitation of addicts,
medical personnel, curative medicines, and preventive measures by law
enforcement agencies. Many countries lacked such financial resources. So,
actions against drug abuse began crossing national boundaries. The
awareness of a possible proliferation of drugs raised concern of the world
public opinion and governments of many countries began pressing for the
intensification of the rule of law on the international scene.
    Consequently, an objective need arose to work out and put into practice
joint inter-governmental agreements, adopt effective legal norms that would
regulate international cooperation, enable countries to employ coordinated
measures against drugs as a whole and its specific manifestations and to
establish, as a result, both a domestic and international control over the
use of narcotics and their consumption.
    The first experiment of international control over narcotics and of
measures against drug addiction at the international level dates back to
the Shanghai Opium Commission held between February 5th and 26th 1909 in
the city of Shanghai.
                                          Shanghai Opium Commission of 1909:
    This commission consisted of the representatives from 13 countries:
Russia, the USA, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Britain, France, China, Italy,
Japan, Netherlands, Persia, Portugal and Siam.
    The commission attempted to work out measures that would block the
illegal flow of drugs from the regions of Asia to European countries and
the United States. It also discussed questions related to opium smoking and
to international trade in opium derivatives.
    In the long run, however, no constructive measures were produced.
Documents issued by the commission contained no specific bans even on opium
smoking. Members of the commission thought it was sufficient to only speak
about its regulation and gradual restriction.
    Nevertheless, the work of the Shanghai opium commission of 1909 played
a significant role. Officially it marked the beginning of actions against
drug addiction at the international level and to the launching of a system
of international control over the spread of drugs. It also mapped out
directions for the future international legislation in resolving problems
reviewed in Shanghai.
    A further advancement in combating drugs was made in the Hague at the
International Opium Conference held from December 1st 1911 to January 23d
1912. Representatives of 12 countries took part in it (the same as in
Shanghai excluding Austria-Hungary). The conference prepared and adopted
the first convention on drugs (known as the Hague Convention). As a follow
up to the Shanghai Commission, in terms of ideas, the conference proclaimed
the timeliness of actions against narcotics as a whole and its specific
trends.
    The Hague Convention of 1912:
The Hague convention of 1912 was the first to define the specific types of
drugs, which were put under international control. They were raw opium,
smoke opium, medicinal opium, morphine, cocaine and a few others. The
contracting parties took pledges of both domestic and international nature
upon themselves to adopt national laws establishing control over the
production and distribution of raw opium, and at barring its illegal
imports and exports without permits granted by specially authorized
persons; to take steps towards gradually halting the production, domestic
trade and use of smoke opium and introducing a ban on its imports and
exports; to use narcotic substances (medicinal opium, morphine and cocaine)
only for medicinal and «other reasonable purposes»; to ensure a legal
regulation of the production of morphine, cocaine, medicinal opium, heroin
and their derivatives and also of trade in these narcotic substances; to
adopt appropriate laws (if they are not adopted yet) or change existing
laws concerning the responsibility and punishment of persons guilty of acts
involving the illegal possession of drugs.
    The provision concerning the legal regulation of the production of
morphine and its derivatives and trade in them (cocaine, medicinal opium
and heroin) was an important step. It was an attempt to use preventive
measures such as foreseeing the establishment of international control over
narcotic substances, which could appear in the future without their prior
concrete mentioning in the Convention's text.
    The significant feature about the Convention was that it not only
proclaimed the need for cooperation among countries in establishing control
over the use of narcotics but also outlined what needed to be accomplished.
One of these accomplishments was the duty of countries to exchange, via the
Dutch government, texts of legal acts and statistics on drugs.
    The 1912 Hague Convention, however, failed to bring practical results,
largely because of World War I, which began soon after the passing of the
Convention. It was put into force only with the signing of the Versailles
and other peace treaties which specified that their ratification was
tantamount to the ratification of the 1912 Hague Convention on drugs.
    International documents approved following the Hague Convention just
filled in the gaps and developed its provisions. The need for such
documents was prompted by the continuous expansion of drug addiction, and
of the illegal trade and smuggling of various narcotics. These documents
are kept within the demands of the present problems that had been approved
at the international level. They had defined more precisely and expanded
the range of questions pertaining to the regulation of the issue on the
basis of international law. They also involved more and more countries
concerned about combating narcotics.
    The growing threat from narcotics was evident from a series of
international acts on drugs. Apart from that, however, the passing of these
acts marked an important stage in international relations. They affirmed
the principle that international law was bound to help organize and ensure
control over drugs. The case in point was the Agreement banning the
production, domestic trade and use of refined opium. It was signed on
February 11th 1925 at the Geneva Opium conference.
    Following the signing of the Versailles Peace Treaty and the founding
of the League of Nations this conference was the first to discuss the issue
of narcotics.
    Its official program envisaged the development of measures to implement
the decisions of the 1912 Hague Convention to limit and eliminate the
production, domestic trade and use of smoke opium. But according to
juridical literature, the Conference in reality expressed the latent
interests of the colonial powers- the signatories of the above mentioned
Agreement.
             The Geneva Conference of 1925 Agreement of February 11th, 1925:
    The Agreement provided for the establishment of monopoly associations
on the territories and domains controlled by these powers to deal with the
opium turnover, for handing over the production of smoke opium to the state
monopoly, as well as conducting anti-opium propaganda.
    The general control over the implementation of the Agreement's
provisions concerning the trade in opium was placed upon the League of
Nations- an international body set up in accordance with the Versailles
peace treaty.
    One of the provisions of this Agreement stipulated the need to study
the state of control over smoke opium in the Far East. This study was
carried out, practically for the first time in world practice, by a Special
Commission appointed by the League of Nations Assembly in 1928.
    The results of the study were examined in Bangkok and paved the way for
the signing of the Bangkok Agreement of November 27th 1931, which banned
opium smoking. The Agreement entered into force only in April 1937.
    The Bangkok Agreement of 1931:
The Bangkok Agreement added some new provisions to the Geneva Agreement of
11th February 1925. These new provisions made retail trade in opium
possible only by government institutions; established criminal offence for
persons under 21 years of age who visited opium dens; legally regulated the
sale of smoke opium for cash and so on and so forth.
    However, prior to the Bangkok Agreement, in view of the deterioration
of the drug situation in the world in the postwar period, the second Geneva
Opium Conference passed an Opium Convention that was signed in Geneva on
19th February 1925 and entered into force in September 1928.
                                               The Opium Convention of 1925:
    It underlined that there was no way to end drug abuse and drug
smuggling unless the production of those drugs was reduced considerably and
a more stringent control over their international trade was introduced than
the one stipulated by the 1912 Hague convention.
    For this end, the 1925 Convention stipulated some legal and
organizational measures against drug abuse both at the international and
domestic levels.
    This Convention confirmed the principles of the 1912 Hague Convention
and, what is more, it firmly established that drugs could be produced only
for the legal purposes of states, having defined what these legal purposes
were. Of principal importance was the decision to put several more kinds of
raw materials which drugs could be produced from (coca leaves, raw cocaine,
and cannabis) on the list of the controlled substances (in addition to the
ones named by the 1912 Hague Convention). Moreover, the Convention was
applicable to any substance, which, in accordance with the conclusion drawn
by an authorized body, could cause the same harmful consequences as the
substances listed in the Convention.
    To exercise domestic control over narcotic substances the parties to
the Convention agreed to the following pledges: to pass national laws that
would ensure the control over the production, dissemination and exportation
of raw opium and to systematically revise and toughen those to the extent
that the articles of the Convention would require; to limit the use,
production, importation, sale, distribution, export, and application of
narcotics exclusively to medical and scientific purposes; to exercise
control over the activities of persons who were allowed to produce, import,
export, sell, distribute and use drugs and also to exercise control over
premises where these persons work with drugs or traded in them; to curtail
the number of ports, cities and other populated centers where the
importation and exportation of narcotics would be permitted and to pass
through and adopt domestic legislation that would envisage punitive
measures for the violations of the Convention's provisions.
    To exercise international control over narcotic substances the
Convention stipulated adoption of the following measures: to introduce a
system of evaluation and estimation of a country's domestic need in
narcotics for medical, scientific and other purposes in the up-coming year;
to hand in statistics connected with drugs (in a special form and at
definite periods of time); to establish control over international trade in
drugs and to also establish firm rules for the importation and exportation
of drugs (to import and export narcotics only if there is a special written
permission, as outlined by the Convention; to regulate the order of transit
shipments and the storage of drugs at stores of third countries to prevent
their possible leakage from the legal circulation during their shipments
and storage); to establish control over the compliance with all commitments
taken by the countries- parties to the Convention; to place the exercise of
that control on a newly organized international body called the Permanent
Central Committee (later its official name changed several times, although
most of the time, it was known as «The Permanent Central Committee on
Narcotic Substances»).
    The Convention also stressed the need for cooperation between countries
in preventing the use of narcotic substances for purposes other than
designated. It stipulated that the exchange of information about laws and
decisions on the implementation of the proclaimed principles (using the
services of Secretary General) would be a concrete form of this
cooperation.
    To put it in a nutshell, the Convention defined the content and forms
of realization of international control over narcotics. It introduced a
system of licensing and recording foreign trade operations of drugs and
obliged the member countries to submit detailed statistics about such
operations.
    The convention on the limitation of production and the regulation of
the distribution of narcotic substances signed on July 13th 1931 in Geneva
proved to be another link in the international control system.
                                                     The Convention of 1931:
    That Convention meant to introduce amendments to the two already
existing conventions in force, those of 1912 and of 1925. It contained the
following additions: uniform definition of notions, through the control
over drugs. Alternative versions of such notions as «production»,
«refining», «processing», «storage reserves», «state storage reserves»,
«import-export» and others were removed. For the first time, a list of
medicines containing drugs was established and production, processing, use,
exportation and importation of them would now be controlled. The system of
evaluating and estimating the overall demand for drugs in all countries
regardless of their membership in the given Convention was perfected.
Accountability for the commitments of member governments was enhanced. A
special agency, the Control Commission, was set up to study data from
governments about the quantity of narcotics and accounts about their
receipt and use. In case the Commission found any deviations or the demand
for drugs was too large in its judgment, the Commission had the right to
question the examined figures and carry out its own calculations. The
extradition of criminals was envisaged (under certain conditions) for
committing crimes linked to drugs. The convention stipulated that member-
countries had to have norms in their national legislation concerning the
criminal punishment of persons who encouraged the illegal spread of the
most dangerous forms of drugs.
    The Convention also contained some administrative decisions aimed at
perfecting the domestic control over drugs. It urged member-countries, in
particular, to set up a special body that was to apply the Convention's
decisions; regulate, supervise and control the trade in medicines on the
Convention's list; act against toxicomania using all possible measures for
halting its development, and bar, in particular, the illegal trafficking of
toxic substances.
    Under the Convention cooperation between member-countries expanded
considerably. Along with the traditional exchange of the texts of legal
acts, an annual report was to be submitted to the Secretary General of the
League of Nations about the Convention's implementation on the territories
of the member-states. The report was to be compiled in accordance with the
model agreed upon by the Consultative Commission on the Turnover of Opium
and other medicines containing harmful substances.
    The contracting parties also pledged to inform each other, through the
office of the League of Nations Secretary General, about all the important
cases of illegal drug trafficking. These reports had to highlight sources
or methods of illegal trafficking, the nature and the amount of drugs, the
time and place of their discovery, smuggling methods and sanctions and
measures in acted by the government.
                                              The Geneva Convention of 1936:
    The convention against illegal trade in drastic medicines signed on
26th June 1936 in Geneva became the next important document.
    That Convention introduced a number of new essential amendments
corresponding with its title containing the word 'struggle', which opened a
prospect for a juridical cooperation in campaigns against drug abuse. The
range of crimes subject to prosecution was outlined and expanded
considerably. Contracting parties pledged to prosecute persons engaged in
the illegal manufacture, storage, shipment, exportation, sale or purchase
of drugs or who organized conspiracies with the aim of premeditated
participation in the illegal drug trade. The Convention also provided for
the extension of reciprocal legal assistance through the exchange of
necessary information to identify and arrest criminals and extradite them
to a foreign country.
    World War II pushed the problems of international cooperation and
control of narcotic substances to the background. But right after the end
of the war this problem came to the foreground once again. In view of this,
some international acts were adopted that regulated relations in the area
of narcotics. The following documents seem to be of interest.
                                          The Protocols of 1946 and of 1948:
    The Protocol on Drugs signed in Lake Success (New York) on 11th
December, 1946 provided for the introduction of changes into the
agreements, conventions and protocols on drugs signed in the Hague on 23d
January 1912; in Geneva — on 11th February 1925, 19th February 1925 and
13th July 1931; in Bangkok — on 27th November 1931 and in Geneva — on 26th
June 1936. The Protocol on Drugs covered issues that arose in view of the
dissolution of the League of Nations and the transferring of some of its
drug control functions to the Organization of United Nations, the World
Health Organization or its Interim Committee, and of the transferring of
duties of the League of Nations Secretary General- to the UN Secretary
General. The Protocol was the first UN document that introduced necessary
re-naming although in reality changed nothing in the system of control and
cooperation that existed hitherto.
    The Protocol signed in Paris on 19th November 1948 dealt with the
establishment of international control on medicines that were not put on
the list of the 1931 Convention which limited the production and regulated
the distribution of narcotics (changes to this Protocol were introduced by
the 1946 Lake Success Protocol).
    The signatories of this Protocol pledged to inform the UN about any
substance that could possibly be abused and also to spread control onto
synthetic drugs that had appeared by the time of the signing, and had not
been previously listed in earlier international regulations.
    Discussion of drug issues at the international level and the adoption
of decisions under international law brought national legislation closer
together, helped define priorities of the anti-narcotics movement, form an
understanding of the danger posed by narcotics and control the lists of
narcotics whose manufacture and use was subject to international control.
    Yet, the existence of such simultaneously operating legal acts and
international bodies failed to ensure sufficient legal regulation and
control of all the issues connected with narcotics. This failure created
certain difficulties for exercising control over drug abuse. The existing
international acts also lagged behind the realities of life.
    Many issues remained unresolved. For example, only some narcotic
preparations were controlled whereas the production of raw materials for
the making of synthetic drugs remained uncontrolled. The cultivation and
use of drug-bearing plants and other problems related to narcotics required
a legal regulation. In view of this, two important international acts were
worked out and approved within the United Nations framework. They were the
Uniform Convention on Drugs of 1961 amended later by the 1972 Protocol on
Drugs, and the United Nations Convention of 1988 which provided for action
against the illegal trafficking of narcotics and psychotropic substances.
    One need not think however that the provisions of the earlier approved
acts were so out-dated that they required to be radically changed. The two
Conventions left intact therefore many time-tested provisions of the above-
cited documents. At present they form the main legal foundation for the
system helping exercise international cooperation and control over drugs.
                                             The Uniform Convention of 1961:
    The 1961 Uniform Convention regulates questions pertaining to the legal
use of drugs. Its adoption was a landmark in the development of relations
based on international law. The Convention is designed to promote decisive
actions against narcotics at the international level through the building
of a system of international cooperation and control over narcotics. In
fact, this one document is a substitute for all the previously accepted
international acts (with the exception of some points of the 1936
Convention). It diminished the number of international bodies in charge of
the control over narcotics, and established control over the production of
drug-bearing raw materials.
    The participants in the Convention expressed the wish to sign a
universally accepted international convention to limit the use of narcotics
to medical and scientific purposes only and to maintain permanent
international cooperation in order to accomplish the principles and aims of
the Convention.
    The parties to the Convention pledged to adopt not only necessary
legislative measures, as the case had been here-to fore, but also
administrative measures and to ensure fulfillment of the Convention's
decisions. They took upon themselves to limit the production, exportation,
importation, distribution, use, storage, and trade in narcotics and limit
their use and storage for medical purposes exclusively in order to diminish
sufferings and pain.
    Instead of the previous four international agencies, which controlled
narcotics, the Convention authorized the formation of just two: the
Commission on Drugs under the UN Economic and Social Council and the newly
formed International Committee on Drug Control of the United Nations
Organization.
    The Convention endowed these two bodies with broad authority.
                                   The Commission on Drugs of the UN ECOSOC:
    The Commission examines all issues that bear relation to the aims
proclaimed by the Uniform Convention. Every year it approves and amends the
List of substances, plants and preparations, the use, dissemination,
cultivation and storage of which is under international control. It
introduces corresponding changes and additions to the List and informs the
national governments. The Commission also informs the Committee of any
circumstances that may bear upon execution of its functions. Finally, it
issues recommendations concerning the implementation of the Convention's
aims and decisions, including the program of research and the exchange of
scientific and technical information.
    For example, one of the recommendations calls for the need to provide
countries where the illegal cultivation of drug-bearing plants is practiced
with an access to modern reconnaissance technology which makes it possible
to discover and then destroy such fields. This recommendation also calls
for the need to promote the economies of these countries so that their
farmers could earn a living by working at legal agricultural and other
enterprises; to combine steps against the illegal production and spread of
narcotics with the efforts to build a more just international order, give
help to third world countries in boosting their economies, developing their
traditional export industries and agriculture, and train specialists; to
regard programs for preventing drug addiction and curing drug addicts as
top priorities.28
    Member countries may also be asked to submit their own recommendations.
These may include annual reports about the Convention's implementation on
their respective territories, texts of laws and rules passed with the aim
of implementing the Convention's provisions; names and addresses of
government agencies authorized to give permits for the exportation or
certificates for the importation of narcotics; or any other reports about
cases of illegal trafficking.
The UN Committee on Drug Control:
    In accordance with the requirements of the 1961 Uniform Convention
(with amendments) the Committee consists of 13 members elected for the term
of 5 years. 3 members with medical, pharmaceutical and pharmacological
experience from the list of persons submitted by the WHO and 10 members-
from the list of persons submitted by countries belonging to the UN.
Persons recommended as members of the Committee have to meet special
requirements such as competence, non-involvement, impartiality,
trustworthiness and must have an awareness of the situation in the
countries where narcotics are produced, made and consumed.
    The Committee performs important functions, which actually form the
essence of the system of international control over the legal use of
narcotics. They are:
    — using the system of estimation of the countries' demand for drugs.
The countries concerned are obliged to submit the following annual
estimations written in special forms to the Committee: the quantity of
drugs used for medical and scientific purpose and for the preparation of
other narcotics, medicines and substances not covered by the given
Convention; the quantity of stored available narcotics as of December 31st
of the reported year; the size and the geographical position of the field
used for cultivating opium poppy and the approximate quantity of opium
expected to be obtained from it, and the number of enterprises producing
synthetic drugs and the quantity of such drugs produced at each enterprise;
    — estimating the overall level of drugs produced and imported by any
country or territory throughout one year (quantity of drugs imported which
is above the reported figures cannot be permitted without a sanction from
the Committee);
    — introducing a regulated order for endorsing the demand for drugs used
for medical purposes. To ensure a balance between the demand and supply of
opiates used in medicine, the Committee sends information with estimates of
the demand for these preparations to the country producing these drugs. The
country is to agree with these estimates and then decrease (or increase)
their production.
    — using the system of statistical reports. The governments submit
statistical reports to the Committee about the production and preparation
of specific drugs, their use and consumption, their exportation and
importation, their detention, their stocks and fields used to cultivate
opium poppy and other data which allows the Committee to determine if
countries are abiding by the Convention's decisions and then take
appropriate measures to ensure their implementation and the accomplishment
of the control functions.
    The Committee collects and analyzes information submitted to it by the
United Nations agencies, individual governments and international
organizations, including Interpol. This information features the
production, manufacture, modification, and consumption of drugs, as well as
international trade in them, supply and confiscation of drugs. The
Committee also points to the shortcomings in the arrangement of control
functions and offers recommendations as to how these shortcomings can be
dealt with. If need be, the Committee has the right to invite
representatives of any country to its meetings.
    Upon getting the information that the target set by the Convention is
endangered in any country due to its failure to abide by the Convention's
decisions, the Committee has the right to ask for an explanation and also
to recommend adjustment measures. If a particular government fails to
provide a satisfactory explanation or to accept the adjustment measures
proposed by the Committee, the problem can be brought to the attention of
the involved parties, of the Council or the Commission. The involved party
may be recommended to stop the importation or exportation of narcotics to
given countries or territories for a specific period of time until the
Committee recognizes that the situation in that country has become
satisfactory.
    The Committee is endowed with the right to impose restrictions, under
certain conditions, on the manufacture and import of drugs.
    Since a large volume of information is available at the Committee it is
able to prepare reports, publish them and forward them to the Council to be
sent to the parties concerned. In these reports the Committee can touch
upon any issues connected with drugs and inform its readers about newly
passed decisions. For example, in its report of 1989 (Vienna) the Committee
called on the governments of all countries to strictly observe the
Convention's provisions, to submit statistical accounts about the available
quantities of narcotics and trade in them, among other related data.
    To avoid alternative versions and form a single understanding, the
Uniform Convention establishes identical definitions of special terminology
related to drugs.
          Drug-related Terminology as Established by the Uniform Convention:
    For example, according to the Convention a «narcotic substance» is any
of the substances included in List I and List II regardless of whether it
is synthetic or natural. Lists I, II, III, and IV are enumerations of
narcotics or drug-bearing preparations and are supplements to the
Convention in which possible changes may be made from time to time in
accordance with the procedures established by the Convention.
    Definitions are also given for cannabis and its plant and resin,
cocaine shrub, coca leaves, opium, opium poppy and poppy straw.
    Significantly, the international understanding of the word
«cultivation» pertaining to drugs covers only the cultivation of opium
poppy, cocaine brush or the cannabis plant. It should be mentioned at this
point that the 1988 UN Convention defines this term differently. But this
will be discussed below.
    The term «illegal trafficking» means the cultivation of or any action
relating to the sale of narcotics in violation of the Convention's
decisions. The term «importation» and «exportation» mean the physical
shipment of narcotics crossing the boundaries of one country to another or
from one territory to another within one and the same country. The term
«territory» means any part of a country defined as a separate unit for the
purpose of applications of the system of drug importation certificates and
drug exportation permits to it.
    The term «manufacture» implies (with the exception of production) all
the processes that pertain to obtaining narcotic substances, including
refining or turning one narcotic into another.
    The term «production» means the separation of opium, coca, cannabis
leaves and cannabis resin from the plants, which they are obtained from.
    The term «preparation» means a hard or liquid mixture containing a
narcotic substance.
    The term «storage stocks» is used in relation to the amount of
narcotics which are available in a particular country or on its territory
and meant to be used for medical or scientific purposes, for exportation or
for the needs of various pharmacists, authorized traders and specialists or
institutions where medical or scientific research is carried out.
    Included in this term is also the notion «special storage stocks» which
is used to describe the amount of narcotics available within a country or a
territory of that country and put at the disposal of its government to be
used for special purposes or in case of an emergency.
    The Uniform Convention introduces a number of specific restrictions and
bans and a special procedure for the cultivation of drug-bearing plants.
The most important restrictions are those concerning the cultivation of
opium poppy, cocaine shrub or cannabis plant.
    Special provisions are envisaged in the first place in relation to
opium. Government-run institutions (one or several) should be set up to
deal with the cultivation of opium poppy and with opium production. They
should have the right to determine areas and sizes of fields, and issue
licenses and permits for land plots where a certain amount of opium poppy
can be grown and a certain amount of opium-produced. These government-run
institutions should be endowed with the exclusive right to buy opium poppy
crops from farmers and to import, export, conclude wholesale trade deals
and maintain storage opium stocks (with the exception of medicinal opium
and preparations from it.)
    The responsibilities of persons are outlined who have permits
(licenses) to grow drug-bearing plants, to turn over crops of opium poppy
only to the institution which they had received their permits from. Any
departures from the established procedures are qualified as violations of
the law. The Convention permits narcotics to be made only at government-run
enterprises or in accordance with licenses issued to persons with necessary
qualifications.
    The Convention introduces uniform rules for storing narcotics to ensure
that the substances are maintained in proper condition. It envisages the
responsibility of member-states for taking precautionary measures to
prevent the inappropriate use of narcotics or the possibility for them to
become part of illegal trafficking in cases when, for example, they are
kept in airliners' first aid compartments.
    Narcotics can be stored only legally. Their producers are not allowed
to keep them in quantity exceeding the established norms. A compulsory
registration system is established under which the quantity of each
prepared, acquired or used drug should be recorded. Drugs can be stored for
no more than 2 years.
    The signatories of the Convention are obliged to take specially
stipulated measures to combat illegal drug trafficking. The Convention
therefore grants the contracting parties the right to control the work of
persons and enterprises engaged, on a legal basis, in the cultivation,
manufacture, storage and use of narcotics and of those engaged in the
drugs' exportation, importation, distribution and trade.
    The participating countries, besides, have the following duties: to
take steps at home towards coordinating preventive and repressive measures
against illegal drug trafficking; to help each other in carrying out
campaigns against illegal drug trafficking; to closely cooperate with
competent international bodies in carrying out coordinated actions for the
purpose of combating narcotics and also to ensure an effective
international cooperation and a quick transfer of legal documents for
launching prosecution.
                                       Punishability of Drug-related crimes:
    The Uniform Convention institutes the punishment for drug-related
crimes and obliges member-countries to take specific actions when crimes
that are recognized as punishable by the Convention are committed
intentionally. Serious crimes should be punished by imprisonment or some
other form of deprivation of freedom. Intentional crimes which are
punishable include: the cultivation and production, manufacture,
extraction, preparation, storage, offer, offer with commercial intentions,
distribution, purchase, sale, delivery on any conditions, drug-pushing,
dispatch, transit re-dispatch, shipping, and importation and exportation of
narcotics. Each of these crimes, if committed in more than one country,
must be considered as a separate crime. Intentional complicity in any of
these crimes, participation in a community with the aim to commit or
attempt to commit a crime, preparatory actions or financial operations
related to the above cited crimes must also be recognized as punishable
actions. Sentences passed by foreign courts for such crimes must be taken
into account when considering recidivism.
    The Convention recommends that any extradition treaty should make these
crimes subject to extradition.
    Yet while instituting punishment for a long list of drug-related crimes
the Uniform Convention also includes a special decision on treating drug
addicts. It calls on the member-states to create conditions conducive to
providing them with rehabilitation and restoring their ability to work. If
economic opportunities are available in the country, appropriate conditions
should be created providing preventive treatment to drug addicts.
                                                  The UN Convention of 1988:
    The 1988 Convention regulates questions relating to the illegal
trafficking of drugs and psycho tropes. The aim of this Convention is to
promote cooperation between the contracting parties so as to more
effectively solve various problems involving worldwide illegal drug
trafficking, curtail its size and prevent its grave consequences. The
Convention particularly emphasizes the danger of the proliferation of
illegal drug trafficking and the involvement of children in it. It points
to the need to ensure control of easily accessible substances and those,
which are used to make narcotics illegally.
    Special attention is paid to the need to improve international
cooperation to block illegal drug trafficking at sea. The Convention
envisages steps to prevent a certain number of offenses.
    The contracting parties are expected to adopt necessary legislative and
organizational steps. The following provisions seem to be the most
interesting.
                                     The Notion of Illegal Drug Trafficking:
    Firstly, there is a provision, bearing the form of a recommendation,
for member states that national legislation should recognize certain
premeditated actions included by the Convention into the notion of «illegal
trafficking» as common crimes. Actions that violate the 1961 Convention
(with amendments) include: production, manufacture, preparation, offer for
sale, distribution, sale, delivery on any terms, middleman services,
shipping, transit shipping, transportation, and importation or exportation
of any narcotic. Other actions which should be recognized as crimes are the
cultivation of specially indicated narcotic-bearing plants in order to turn
out drugs; storing or purchasing any narcotic for illegal trafficking;
making, transporting or distributing equipment, materials or substances for
the purpose of illegal cultivation, production or manufacture of narcotics;
organization, guidance or financing of any offenses listed above;
conversion or transfer of property obtained from the above mentioned
offenses in order to conceal or cover up an illegal source of property or
in order to help a person who is taking part in committing the listed
offenses to evade responsibility for his actions; concealment or secrecy of
the true nature of the source, whereabouts, arrangement method, transfer of
the rights in relation to property or its belonging if it is known that
this property is gained as a result of the listed offenses; possession of
equipment or materials needed to illegally cultivate, produce or make any
narcotic; public encouragement or incitement of other persons by any means
to commit any of the above-mentioned offenses; participation or involvement
in a criminal collusion in order to commit the mentioned offenses, as well
as accomplice, incitement, assistance or advice during their commission;
and intentional storage, acquisition or cultivation of any narcotic for
personal use in defiance of the provisions of the 1961 Convention (with
amendments).
    Secondly, there is a provision concerning matters of responsibility and
punishment of people convicted of dangerous drug-related crimes. This
provision recommends such sanctions as imprisonment or the deprivation of
freedom, as well as additional measures in the form of rehabilitation,
restoration of the ability to work, or social reintegration with subsequent
supervision.
                                                      Controlled Deliveries:
    Thirdly, there is a provision about the use of controlled deliveries at
the international level based on mutual accords. Controlled delivery is a
method under which exportation, transportation or importation of illegal or
suspicious batches of drugs are allowed on the territory of one or several
countries with the knowledge and under the supervision of competent
agencies in order to identify the participants in these offenses.
    Most norms covered by international conventions are part of the laws of
the Russian Federation, and more of these norms may be registered in the
future provided there are suitable conditions.
                                  Measures to Prevent Drug Money Laundering:
    There are two documents, which have been mentioned earlier that are
very important in controlling drug abuse because they affect the «sore
points» of narco-business. Both of these documents need to be applied in
the Russian Federation. One, from 12th December 1988, is a statement by the
Committee on Banking Rules and Banking Supervision. Its aim is to prevent
the criminal use of the banking system for laundering money gained from the
trade in drugs. The other is the decision by the heads of state and
government of the 7 leading industrial countries and by the European
Commission Chairman. Under this decision taken at the 15th Economic Summit
in Paris in July 1989, a Special Operations Group on financial issues was
set up.
    It must also be noted that the past few years have seen the convocation
of numerous official and unofficial conferences, symposia and meetings of
experts specializing in combating drug abuse, including one held in 1996 in
Baku. They all worked out and recommended for implementation various
measures to control narcotics.
     Par. 2. Tendencies in the World Community's Reaction to Drug Abuse.
    The world community counteracts the negative tendencies of drug abuse.
This can be clearly seen in the materials of the world fora and in the
international legal acts.
                            The Overriding Tendency of Combating Drug Abuse:
    The overriding tendency is the expanding scale, and improvement of
activities, as well as of the international legal regulations combating
drug abuse. The core of this tendency is expressed in the following
trajectory from the study of drug abuse, and exerting influence by the
world community through establishing international control over legitimate
distribution and consumption of drugs, to the adoption and implementation
of the increasingly diversified, detailed, rationalized and tough measures
combating illegal drug trafficking and criminal drug money laundering.
These measures are being worked out by international agencies and
organizations and are aimed at fully blocking the spread of narcotics.
    This overall tendency can be seen in several of its more concrete
manifestations, such as bringing the problem of narcotics to the forefront;
expanding the sphere of the international legal regulation by amending
existing measures and approving new international legal norms; making
actions against drug abuse more purposeful by revealing its most vulnerable
spots and controlling them by using new, more perfected international legal
norms; ensuring a more universal, unified and standardized understanding of
international legal terms regulating narcotics and; adopting international
legal norms that pave the way for a real opportunity to combat narcotics;
bringing international and national legal acts in line concerning actions
against narcotics in the process of nations joining international legal
acts and ratifying them; increasing the number of countries taking part in
international conferences on actions against narcotics and the number of
countries joining international legal acts and setting up and expanding the
functions of specialized international agencies that work to combat
narcotics.
                Bringing to the Foreground Problems of Combating Drug Abuse:
    Nearly 80 years since the convocation of the Shanghai Opium Commission
in 1909, the first official body on the international scene that had drawn
attention to the problems of narcotics, its regulation and gradual
restriction, public attention to the problem has been steadily growing in
proportion to the rise in the degree of public danger and the spread of
narcotics. This is manifested by the increasing number of conferences,
meetings, and symposia that concentrate on working out and adopting various
international legal acts regulating measures to combat narcotics along with
producing recommendations aimed at improving these types of measures and
their application.
    Expanding the Sphere of International Legal Regulation:
Expanding the sphere of international legal regulation means that each
successive forum and each new international legal act against narcotics has
focused on such areas of drug abuse, which have not been previously subject
of international regulation.
    In particular, the 1912 Hague Convention was the first to define types
of narcotics — raw opium, smoke opium, medicinal opium, morphine and some
others, which were placed under international control. Later this list was
expanded. Under the Convention of 19th February 1925, some additional raw
materials such as coca leaves, raw cocaine and Indian hemp (cannabis) were
included. Also any other drug capable of causing harmful affects, according
to the finding of a competent body, could be added to the list. Under the
Protocol of 19th November 1948 the list was further extended by synthetic
drugs that had come into being by that time and had not been regulated by
any of the previously adopted international legal acts. The 1961 Uniform
Convention contained a much longer list of narcotics allowing for further
subsequent changes and additions.
    The 1912 Hague Convention obliged the participating countries to pass
national legislation controlling the production, distribution, importation
and exportation of raw opium as well as measures scaling down production,
domestic trade and consumption of smoke opium, banning its import and
export. The Agreement of 11th February 1925 envisaged setting up a
government monopoly for opium production and monopoly associations for
opium trade. The Geneva Convention of 19th February 1925 introduced new
measures, such as exercising control over the activities of persons who
held permits to manufacture, import, export, sell, distribute and apply
narcotics, as well as control over the premises where these persons
practiced their trade. The Convention also limited the number of ports,
cities and other populated centers through which the import and export of
drugs was allowed, and urged the adoption of domestic legislation
qualifying violation of these provisions of the Convention as criminal
offence. The Convention of 13th July 1931 formulated the following
additional measures: extradition of criminals for committing drug-related
crimes; setting up domestic government agencies to implement the
Convention's decisions and regulations, supervision over the trade in drug-
bearing medicines, listed in the Convention, and a clamp-down on illegal
drug trafficking. The Bangkok agreement of 27th November 1931 contained
such amendments as limiting retail opium trade to government agencies only.
For persons under 21 years of age visiting opium dens, was a criminal
offence. The Convention of 26th June 1936 was the first to introduce the
word «struggle» and provided for a much wider range of criminal drug-
related offenses. Under the Protocol of 19th November 1948, the signatories
had to inform the UN about any substance that had the potential of being
abused in the future.
    The 1961 Uniform Convention (with amendments) broadened international
legal norms, over new aspects of drug abuse. For example, it established a
special procedure for cultivating narcotic-bearing plants and manufacturing
narcotic substances, it established uniform rules for storing drugs. These
procedures bound the signatories to cooperate with each other and with
authorized international organizations in arranging and holding campaigns
against illegal drug trafficking, and in applying imprisonment and against
those guilty of premeditated drug-related crimes.
    The 1988 UN Convention contained recommendations to define concrete
premeditated actions as crimes in national legislation. An extended list of
these crimes was included into the concept «illegal drug trafficking.» The
Convention also listed such measures as medical treatment of addicts,
restoration of their working capabilities or social re-integration under
subsequent supervision. The Convention outlined recommendations on using
controlled deliveries at the international level on the basis of mutual
accords.
                                      Purposeful Actions Against Drug Abuse:
    Intensifying actions against drug abuse by revealing and attacking
vulnerable spots of narco-business through the help of new, more perfect
law as the world community increasing realized the danger of narcotics, it
displayed a growing ability to apply new international legal norms. As a
result the world community has been approving appropriate legal norms to
check the spread of narcotics. For example, on the basis of the 1912 Hague
Convention the signatories pledged to undertake measures to gradually stop
the production, domestic trade, and consumption of smoke opium, as well as
to ban its import and export. The 1988 Convention registered the provision
on controlled drug deliveries at the international level on the basis of
mutual accords. In accordance with the statement by the Committee for
Banking Rules and Banking Supervision of 12th December 1988 and the
decision of July 1989 by the heads of states and governments of the seven
leading industrial nations and by the European Commission Chairman,
measures were taken to prevent criminal use of the banking system for
laundering money obtained from drug trade.
                                        The Universalization of Legal Norms:
    The trend to ensure universalization, unification and standardization
of the international legal norms on narcotics first manifested it self in
the 1912 Hague Convention, the Convention of 19th February 1925 and the
Uniform Convention. These contained uniform lists of controlled narcotics.
The Convention of 13th July 1931 introduced the notions «production»,
«refining», «processing», «reserve storage stocks», «government storage
stocks», «export-import», «cultivation», «illegal trafficking»,
«territory», «manufacture», «preparation», «storage stocks», and «special
storage stocks». The 1961 Uniform Convention and the 1988 Convention
provided unified lists of socially dangerous activities, qualified as
criminal offenses.
                 Raising the Effectiveness of the International Legal Norms:
    More and more specific and not just declarative norms ensuring
effective and lasting actions against narcotics have been introduced into
law-enforcement practice at each new stage in the international legal
regulation of narcotics. The adoption of these international legal norms is
paving the way for a real opportunity to oppose drug abuse.
    Whereas the 1909 Shanghai Opium Commission failed to generate any
constructive measures against narcotics, the 1912 Hague Convention managed
to define the kinds of narcotics to be placed under international control.
The Agreement of 11th February 1925 provided for the establishment of
monopoly institutions to deal with opium and for the transfer of the smoke
opium production to a government monopoly. The Convention of 19th February
1925 extended the list of controlled narcotics and introduced new
restrictions. Appropriate provisions of the 1931 Bangkok Agreement, the
Convention of 13th July 1931, of 26th June 1936, the Protocol of 19th
January 1948, the 1961 Uniform Convention (with amendments), the 1988 UN
Convention and documents of the European Community of 1988 and 1989 as
discussed above, have also been raising the effectiveness of the drive
against narcotics.
              Bringing into Line the International and National Legal Norms:
    Increasingly international and national legal norms against narcotics
are brought into line as nations sign and ratify international acts. This
leads to the mutual enrichment of the international and national legal
norms aimed at blocking narcotics. On the one hand, the world community
elevates national legal norms to international level by instituting
international legal norms. On the other hand, nations ratify international
legal acts thus adopting them as domestic legislation. International and
domestic legal norms coincide almost completely sometimes, in such areas
the list of narcotics and drug-related actions considered a criminal
offense, as well as the procedure of filing criminal charges against
persons committing drug-related crimes, and their extradition.
            The Rise in the Number of Countries Taking Part in International
                                                                Conferences:
    There has been an increase in the number of nations taking part in
international conferences on narcotics and in the number of nations signing
international legal acts. This is evident in the fact that 13 nations took
part in the Shanghai Opium Commission in 1909, whereas 73 nations attended
the New York conference, which adopted the Uniform Convention in 1961.
Since then, many nations have ratified the Uniform Convention and the 1988
UN Convention and more are going to sign them.
                                            Setting up Specialized Agencies:
    The world community has created and keeps expanding the functions of
the specialized agencies dealing with narcotics, such as Permanent Central
Committee on Drugs of 1925, the Special Commission of 1928, the Control
Commission of 1931, the Commission on Drugs of the UN Economic and Social
Council of 1961 and the UN International Committee on Drug Control, and the
special operations group on financial matters of 1989 dealing with money
laundering resulting from drug trafficking. These agencies handle more and
more functions in response to the ever more sophisticated dissemination of
drugs, and money laundering resulting from drug trafficking.
    The reaction of the world community to narcotics examined above shows a
deeper understanding of this dangerous phenomenon, along with the
increasing sophistication of measures against it. One can predict that this
tendency will remain steadfast and keep progressing.
           Chapter IV. Measures to Suppress and Prevent Drug Abuse
Measures to Prevent Drug Abuse Regulated by Law:
    International legal acts are realized on a national scale. National
measures in turn are of the three basic types: suppression, prevention, and
rehabilitation.
    Legal measures of suppression are coercive measures in regard to crimes
that have already been committed. They are a combination of criminal-legal,
criminal-executive and legal-administrative measures.
    The criminal-legal measures must be fully compatible with the criminal
law and registered in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. They are
expected to safeguard the public from the drug-related crimes by inflicting
punishment on persons who have committed these crimes and also, in
combination with it, in cases stipulated by the law, apply coercive
measures of medical nature or, if need be, a system of guardianship. These
measures can be divided into two groups: those referring to crime and those
referring to punishment. Measures of the second group, though they are
envisaged by the norms of the criminal law, seem to be closer to legal-
executive measures, and can therefore be grouped, with a certain degree of
relativity, into the legal-executive category.
    The legal-executive measures include punishment, coercive measures of
medical nature, as well as the process of executing punishment and coercive
measures of medical nature along with putting under guardianship, if
required.
    Legal-administrative measures are covered by the norms of the
administrative law, establishing responsibility for the infringements of
the law and regulating compulsory treatment of drug addicts.
    Measures to prevent narcotics are very diverse. Their aim is to exert
influence on various elements such as on persons using drugs, sowing and
raising drug-bearing crops, manufacturing, acquiring, storing and selling
narcotic substances and committing other drug-related crimes; on persons
committing crimes with the aim of getting the means to purchase drugs or
those undertaking criminal actions in the state of narcotic intoxication;
and on circumstances that are seen as causes and conditions of drug
addiction, etc. The preventive influence on all these persons may take
three forms: persuasion, compulsion and stimulation.
    The last two forms can only be applied if they are regulated by law.
    Measures to Prevent Drug Abuse Unregulated by Law:
    In terms of goals these measures can be divided into general social and
special ones. General social measures have to do with society's social and
economic development, the rise in cultural, educational and moral standards
of all citizens. The economic development measures aim to increase the
production of material benefits, as well as of intellectual output making
the nation richer and the living standards higher. Social measures are
apparent in rational distribution of funds in increase the government
provides for social needs. Cultural and educational measures aim to promote
the development of art, literature, science and education; they draw an
ever-greater number of people into this process and ensure that they gain
knowledge, know-how, and skills. Measures aiming to raise moral standards
are expressed in inculcating an awareness of the need to abide by the
social, particularly, legal, religious and other norms and rules of conduct
in society. All these measures are designed to prevent crimes and
violations, including drug-related crimes, and drug abuse particularly.
    Special are those measures that prevent drug abuse as such, and crimes
related to it, including those recommended by the international
organizations and fora.
    These are, for example, measures to promote a healthy way of life
without consumption of narcotics and censuring the harm caused by narcotics
and drug-related crimes. These measures are implemented by means of: 1)
education — lectures, presentations at schools and other training centers,
statements on the radio, television or press; 2) training law enforcement
officers and medical personnel in the techniques of combating narcotics and
drug-related crimes by creating special educational programs and setting up
special training centers; 3) treatment and rehabilitation of addicts; 4)
collection, analysis, summary, and transmission of information about
narcotics, particularly, about new areas of drug-bearing plants, and
methods of their production, illegal channels for their exportation, as
well as the methods for moving them, using different kinds of transport; 5)
preventing the sowing and the growing of drug-bearing plants by replacing
them with other crops and stimulating the farmers and providing them an all-
round assistance; 6) blocking the channels through which narcotics are
moved along; curbing the smuggling of drugs through the joint efforts of
customs and law-enforcement officers of neighboring countries specializing
in actions against narcotics; 7) supervising the fulfillment of anti-drug
laws regulating the sowing and growing of drug-bearing plants, drug
circulation, etc; 8) reducing the demand for drugs by preventing their
transfer from the legal to the illegal domain, including the use of a
«daily dosage method» which makes it possible to determine the correlation
between the quantity of drugs necessary for medical and research needs and
the volume of sale; 9) introduction of remote control devices to estimate
the scale of illegal cultivation of drug-bearing plants in remote places
and creating obstacles for laundering money and other property acquired as
a result of drug trafficking.
    In terms of the time, frame measures against narcotics and drug-related
offenses can be divided into early warning, direct impact and
postpenitentiary prophylactic.
    The early warning measures are expected to exert influence on persons,
who are not well-versed in drugs and their danger, and who are informed on
the subject but do not take drugs. The preventive influence on poorly
informed persons is made by disseminating knowledge. In this respect the
experience of the United States is worthy of attention and could be
borrowed by the Russian Federation. For as long as a quarter of a century,
preschool children, especially, the ones who attend day care centers have
been educated that any medicines, including drug-bearing ones are harmful
for their health, if they are taken without a doctor's prescription and the
knowledge of the exact dose. To achieve a more vivid effect an album for
coloring pictures featuring narcotics and health is used.
    In Australia, there are centers for preventing drug abuse where school
students between 5 and 12 years old have 7 lessons a year forming a certain
attitude to narcotics, as well as an awareness of the danger of drug
addiction.
    The influence on persons who are aware of the harm of narcotics and do
not take drugs can be achieved by «tearing them away,» so to speak, from
their surroundings where drugs may be used or are used already. This can be
accomplished by conversation with individuals, their families, and
colleagues living in similar environment.
    Direct impact prophylactic measures are expected to influence persons
taking drugs, including drug addicts. This impact brings or may bring
positive results when medical treatment is combined with the social
rehabilitation.
    Postpenitentiary measures should influence persons who have served
prison terms for drug-related offenses by continuous treatment of drug
addiction, securing the results of previous treatment, and neutralizing a
possible unfavorable influence of their immediate surroundings, finding
jobs and also forestalling the repetition of drug-related offenses.
                              International, National and Regional Measures:
    In terms of their level, the measures to prevent drug abuse can be
divided into international, national and regional.
    International measures are the ones, which are carried out on an
international scale. They include a number of earlier listed special
measures to prevent drug abuse. Apart from that, they also include measures
carried out by the international agencies and organizations, such as 1)
creation of programs to prevent the advancement of narcotics; 2) assistance
to countries in implementation of the conventions provisions; 3) providing
assistance in bringing national legislation in line with the conventions;
4) training officers specializing in actions against narcotics for law-
enforcement and other agencies of different countries; 5) supporting the
scientific development of laboratories in the members countries; 6)
providing financial, technical and other kinds of assistance to raise the
effectiveness of national efforts against drug abuse and ensure access to
the international system of information about narcotics. It should be noted
at this point that the Russian Federation adheres to the international
measures because it has joined the world legal effort aiming to combat
narcotics.
    National measures to prevent drug abuse are the ones, which are carried
out on the entire territory of the Russian Federation. Regional measures
cover the territory of a region, city or district. Any of the mentioned
general or special measures against narcotics can be used on a national or
regional scale.
    It should be stressed at this point, that the last few years have seen
a sharp decline in the effort of law-enforcement bodies, government
agencies and other organizations to prevent offenses, including drug abuse
and drug-related crimes. This state of affairs cannot help but arouse deep
concern. In this context the approval of the national program for combating
drug addiction in the Russian Federation is a necessary step towards
improving the work of preventing narcotics and drug-related crimes, along
with other offenses.
            Chapter V. Organized Measures to Counteract Narcotics
           Par. 1. General Provisions for Counteracting Narcotics
    The multiplicity of drug abuse necessitates a joint combative effort
involving a large number of participants who have a broad spectrum of
powers and who will act simultaneously in different directions, performing
a variety of functions. The joining of anti-narcotism forces can be
achieved through a flexible system of measures against this deplorable
social phenomenon.
                          Organizing a System of Measures Against Narcotics:
    The multifaceted nature of drug abuse necessitates forming a single
united front with many participants acting simultaneously in different
directions, performing various functions with a wide spectrum of measures.
This can be achieved by the mobile and flexible system of measures and
means. In terms of overcoming drug abuse, organization is a system of
measures to combat drug abuse and means of their implementation with regard
to the division of the spheres of activity, responsibilities and
hierarchical order.
    Based on the social and economic reality, actions against narcotics
should comply with the national and international norms of law and with the
scientifically based principles of management. They should take account of
the new developments in medicine, pharmaceutics, psychology, psychiatry,
pedagogy, sociology, instrument building, and have substantial legislative,
material, informational, and research backing. They must have clear
parameters of time and space and, most importantly, professionally trained
personnel.
    At the same time, the anti-narcotics strategy must reflect the irksome
particularities and complicated nature of this phenomenon as it combines
two interrelated sides — that of illness and that of crime. This defines
our approach to drug abuse as a medical, as well as a social problem and it
determines what steps and means must be chosen.
                               Drug Abuse as an Object of Government Action:
    Narcotics-related issues, including organizational ones, cannot be
isolated either from the social, economic, political, historical,
legislative, medical, and biological problems or from other social
pathologies that call for counteraction. The definition of drug abuse as a
phenomenon of multiple factors is not therefore accidental.
    Therefore, efficient counteraction requires much organization and
precisely targeted moves.
    Such a stance justifies the view of drug abuse as an object for state
action.
    This approach makes a broad analysis of the wide-ranging problems and
ways to solve them possible. Besides, drug abuse helps to define who the
subject (subjects) of influence are, its (their) condition and functioning,
the influence its (their) structure projects, as well as choice of goals
and function. These properties also define clear goals and a reasonable
choice of means to attain them as well as to ensure an overall realization.
    Observing the fundamental properties of drug abuse, researchers call
upon us to be ready for new and unusual capability of this phenomenon to
adapt to any conditions and manifest itself in new forms in most
undesirable circumstances. On this occasion A. Gabiani writes: «Hardly had
they banished the opium poppy, when the niche was quickly filled by common
poppy. When the entire hemp-growing regions were cut off from black
markets, the pharmaceutics flooded the market. The channels for natural
drugs were blocked, then the far more dangerous chemicals began spreading.»
    The specificity of drug abuse, and its forms and degree of
proliferation, stress the need for a regular re-evaluation of its rapidly
changing state in order to promote the methods of counteraction, discard
the outlived methods, bring all techniques of exerting influence in line
with the legislation and day-to-day reality. Experience proves that an
objective assessment of any process demands for corrections to be made
which take due notice of reality.
    A system of measures to combat narcotics presupposes that its elements
are mutually compatible and that the system itself can be a part of a
higher order -(law enforcement and crime-prevention systems, and social
administrative systems, as a whole). This means that not one subject or
measure in the counter-narcotics system may contradict the values accepted
by the society. The authority of the subjects must be sufficiently
reflected in their rights and duties.
    It is essential that all elements of the anti-narcotics system have
enough potential possibilities to ensure its effective operation. The
utmost goal of the organization is, in this case, to transform the
potential possibilities into the real functions and make them serve as a
system of counteraction measures. For example, the professional duty of
medical institutions and doctors who provide treatment for drug addicts is
manifested as a certain function performed by the elements of the system of
counteraction to drug abuse.
    A solution of the problems of drug abuse requires, on the one hand,
considerable efforts by national, international and other organizations and
their numerous divisions that act in different directions and focus on
different target groups of people, and on the other hand, it requires
coordination and accord in their activities.
    The interaction of different elements of the system may be indirect,
through the understanding of common objectives. This, however, requires a
link in management. Such a link «is based on a certain program of action
and is, in itself, a method of implementing this program. There is always a
general structure of the process behind a developing operational system.»
                 General Provisions of Organizing Action Against Drug Abuse:
    The above mentioned makes it possible to outline the following
principles of an efficiently organized effort against drug abuse in the
Russian Federation.
    As the manifestations of drug abuse continue to grow and diversify, a
real counteraction is possible only in the framework of a well-tested and
scientifically based government policy which defines the forms, tasks and
contents of the government's contribution to this effort. The understanding
of drug abuse phenomenon should be reflected in the Concept of the
government policy towards narcotics. Its principal goal is to secure
legislative and organizational realization of anti-narcotics efforts, bring
harmony and coordination into the activities of different ministries and
departments, draw up a list of priorities and concentrate the available
resources for their synchronized deployment. No other document but such a
Concept can lay the solid foundation for the National Program of
Counteraction against Narcotics. The Program necessarily requires an
approval at the highest level by the President, the government and the
parliament to make all of its provisions mandatory for everyone.
    The development of the National Program stands out as one of the most
important tasks among the anti-narcotics measures. It is essential to
invite experts in different fields of research, as well as the
practitioners from the concerned departments to participate in it. The list
of participants, the scope of their duties and the financing are to be
endorsed by the government. The authors of the Program have personal
responsibility for producing a profound analysis of the situation with
drugs, and for the efficiency of the recommended methods for combating drug
abuse. They are also responsible for providing research or organizational
background during the implementation of the steps they have recommended.
The time frame and other specifics of the program must be included in the
resolutions of the government and the parliament.
    2. The main goal of the government policy in regard to narcotic
substances should be: a) to prevent their use for other than medical
purposes; b) curb the demand for them; c) and curtail their illegal
manufacturing and turnover. This goal is attainable in practical terms only
through a set of coordinated steps in politics, economy, legislation and
public health. They should be directed at perfecting the laws regulating
narcotics. Methods should be developed of an early identification of the
persons who use drugs for non-medical reasons, of their treatment and
rehabilitation. Policies should be developed counteracting the unlawful
production and sale of drugs at the national and international setting.
    3. The mandatory measures of organizational, legislative and material
support of the government policy in the field of drugs fall into two
categories.
    The first category implies the establishment of an inter-departmental
anti-narcotics system of measures, which will incorporate the following
elements.
    Information support of the program. The departments involved should set
up a data bank to store information about the state of affairs in
narcotics, the proliferation of drugs, the accurate techniques of drug
identification, and other data — national and international — which will
help make decisions and implement measures against narcotics.
    Research and technical support. Conducting fundamental research of and
quick response analysis on drugs, the development of advanced techniques
and technologies of halting narcotics should be implemented.
    Administrative support. The President, the parliament or the government
should found a special committee entrusted with the overall monitoring of
the drug abuse in the republic. This agency also should map out a uniform
national strategy and tactics, direct and coordinate all the elements of
the struggle against narcotics, and set up subordinate regional committees
and commissions. As need be, it should be able to amend the state policy in
regard to drugs. This agency surely must include psychiatrists specializing
in the treatment of addicts, lawyers, psychologists, sociologists,
teachers, pharmacists, journalists and other specialists and experts, as
well as representatives from the ministries of public health, social
welfare, education, agriculture, foreign economic ties, industry and trade,
transport, telecommunications, foreign affairs, the interior, justice,
finance, national security (as well as of the foreign intelligence
service), air, maritime, and inland water transport, of the State Bank,
Intourist, customs service, and the Prosecutor's Office.
    Material support. Financing should be provided for the National Program
to Counteract Drug Abuse in general and for its specific aspects. The
financing structure may include specialized funds.
    Medical support. A mechanism of medical interaction on the issues of
drugs must involve all the agencies and departments concerned and their
separate branches.
    Support from the system of education. It is necessary to train an
appropriate number of anti-drug specialists with due regard to the
experience gained by their foreign counterparts.
    Accountability. Regulated accountability and control of all the
agencies and departments participating in the campaign against narcotics
should be established. The participants will be furnished with special sets
of documents and evaluation criteria. They will bear personal
responsibility for the final results.
    The second category of mandatory measures defines the direction of the
effort against narcotics, sets out the target goals and names the
participants. At a minimum, the main direction should be of a simultaneous
offensive on the production, trade and consumption of drugs.
    In the field of legislative regulation, a set of laws on combating
narcotics should encompass a) perfection of the effective legal acts on
drugs, b) the legally defined rules of identification, check-up and
voluntary/compulsory treatment of drug addicts, c) the rules of drug
identification, d) legislative support of international cooperation
including the obligations that arise from the international treaties and
agreements, e) elaboration of legal norms to fight drug-related money-
laundering, f) and bringing national legislation in line with the
international laws.
    In the field of medicine: the identification, medical treatment and
social rehabilitation of drug addicts presupposes improving the methods of
early diagnosis and treatment of addiction, the development of prophylactic
measures, a system of registering and monitoring drug abusers, the
gathering and analysis of information and information exchange between
relevant departments.
    In the sphere of combating drug-related crimes, it is essential to
suppress the illegal cultivation of plants containing narcotic substances,
improve control over the transportation of narcotics across borders, and
curb their clandestine manufacture. It is also necessary to control the
manufacturing, storage and trade in the chemicals and equipment, which may
be used in the illegal production of drugs. The stamping-out of such crimes
necessitates stringent regulatory mechanisms in the production,
transportation and use of narcotic substances for medical and research
purposes, as required by the international conventions, advancement of
investigative methods, improvement in the customs service, administrative
and other forms of curtailing crimes linked to drugs and limiting the
illegal demand for them. The circle of involved participants in actions
against narcotics, especially in the field of prophylactics and halting the
spread of drug abuse should be enlarged through unconventional forms and
methods of work, such as invigorating the efforts of religious and
charitable organizations, private companies, psychological aid centers,
army units, and so on.
    Understandably, the suggested list of efforts is not exhaustive.
Nonetheless, it puts the emphasis on the main directions and can be viewed
as a version of a multifaceted approach toward organizing a program of
action combating drug abuse.
    The Experience of Countries:
The experience of countries that have developed national programs against
drug abuse can be very instrumental in drawing up a national anti-narcotics
program.
    In 1982, the United States adopted a program against drug trafficking
and organized crime. Its implementation presumed mapping out a special
presidential policy and the participation of the governors of all the
states.
                                                                    The USA:
    The then US President Ronald Reagan sanctioned the allocation of an
additional USD 130 million to the Department of Justice budget for the
implementation of that program. These funds were distributed to the federal
law-enforcement agencies, the judiciary, penitentiaries and the police. The
administration envisioned an increase in the number of prosecutors, FBI
agents, and the personnel of anti-drug departments, customs services, the
coast guards, Internal Revenue Service, Immigration Naturalization Service,
and other departments.
    More than a half of the allocation was set aside as salary and bonuses
for special service agents. The rest was spent on modernizing police
equipment, the renovation of the state and federal prisons, and enhancement
of the FBI technical capabilities in neutralizing criminals who can afford
the most up-to-date listening devices and surveillance equipment.
    The program also made provisions for creating special regional task
force, and creating programs for participation in actions against drug
abuse by the state, as well as for more room in federal jails. Coordination
committees responsible to the Secretary of Justice were established in all
of the 94 Federal judicial districts. The committees were obliged to make
up plans for fighting grave crimes at the county, state and national
levels.
    It was for the first time that a program envisioned deployment of the
armed forces against the spread of drugs. Their task was to detect and
detain traffickers, especially at the US-Mexican border and in the
Caribbean.
    A variety of drug prevention programs were developed at the regional
level, such as the program of aid to potential abusers and their victims in
the District of Columbia or the program against the abuse of drugs and
alcohol by adolescents in Maryland. Many of them, however, remained
ineffective not because they lacked professionalism, but more often because
the moves lacked coordination. Not rare was the shortage of financing,
technical and personnel support.
    In 1989, the US adopted the national strategy against drugs, which is
executed by more than thirty federal departments, including the CIA.
American experts believe that the US share of the worldwide consumption of
drugs is more than a fifty per cent. They also consider drug trafficking as
a global threat which cannot be controlled by the efforts of a single
country. There must be international cooperation to settle this bedeviling
problem.
    Since the bulk of drugs originate outside the US, the Administration
put an emphasis on attacking drug dealers on their home territory and on
stepping up counteraction to the proliferation and sale of drugs inside the
country. The strategy evidently has flaws, as the situation shows no signs
of dramatic improvement.
                                                                     Canada:
    On May 25th, 1987, the Canadian government officially introduced a
national strategy against drug abuse. The strategy had resulted from long
consultations with provincial governments, different private organizations
and individual specialists. The goal of the strategy was to shape a unified
course of actions against the abuse of drugs in Canada.
    The general supervision of its implementation was vested in the
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. Other participants were the Royal
Mounted Police of Canada, the Directorate of the Penitentiaries, the
Ministry of Justice, the Customs Department and the Excise Tax Service, the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Training and Youth.
    The main goal was to work out a balanced line of action that would meet
the needs of all Canadians, bring down the impact of alcohol and other
stimulants on individuals, families and entire communities. The strategy
comprised six directions of action: 1)education and prevention, 2)control
over law abidance, 3) medical treatment and rehabilitation, 4) gathering of
information and research, 5) international cooperation 6) and national
policy. Over two-thirds of the resources were directed into the
educational, preventive and treatment programs to curtail demand on the
banned substances.
    The Royal Mounted Police had the assignment to help develop and
implement five initiatives on restraining the supply of and the demand for
drugs, namely 1) a program to curb the black marketing of drugs, 2) the
coordination of coastal guard patrol, 3) the gathering and processing of
data on drugs, 4) technical assistance to foreign countries and 5) an
educational program.
    Canadian experts note that it is hard to measure the effects of this
program yet, but all the above measures contribute to saving lives and
making the nation healthier.
                                                         The United Kingdom:
    The British government is acting upon a multifaceted anti-narcotic
strategy that it adopted in 1994. There are five strategic priority aspects
in it 1) cutting down drug imports, 2) raising the efficiency of law
enforcement, 3) exercising effective deterrence measures and strict control
inside the country, 4) organizing preventive efforts, and improving the
treatment and 5) the rehabilitation of drug addicts.
    The government strategy is based on the assumption that all the
problems of narcotics are inter-related. Therefore, parallel measures
against the supply and demand of drugs are necessary. It is intended to
scale down illegal imports of drugs by supporting international efforts
against their manufacture and trade, reinforcing the customs and police
force, toughening control over the legitimate production, and consumption
of drugs for medical purposes, deterring drug dealers by heavy fines and
depriving them of their illegal profits.
    The struggle to curtail demand must follow two general lines — keeping
the new addicts from abuse and rendering aid to those whom have developed
addiction.
    To ensure proper interaction of all the elements of this strategy, the
British government has set up a working inter-departmental group from among
the ministers and high-ranking executives. The parliamentary deputy home
secretary heads the group. Also participating in its work are officials of
the home office, the ministries of health, social welfare, and finance, the
customs service, the department of overseas territories, the environmental
department, and so on.
    The new government-run intelligence service for drugs has replaced the
older drugs central intelligence. Police and customs officers staff the
government-run intelligence. Its duty is to gather, analyze and distribute
information obtained either abroad or at home.
    The regional anti-drug departments have special support units. The
customs service has been reinforced by top-class specialists and top-notch
smuggling clampdown equipment. In compliance with the 1986 law on illegal
drug trade, the police and the courts have received broader authority as to
the identification, freezing and confiscation of drug dealers' profits. In
1988 the UK and the USA signed a bilateral agreement on the confiscation of
the discredited bank assets.
    The police and the customs service have formed a special financial
division to accumulate on a national scale, survey and pass down for
further investigation the data on financial issues, i.e. reports from the
banks and other financial institutions on monetary deposits of questionable
origin.
    The government has outlined the procedure for police operations against
the three categories of drug dealers, big, medium and small.
    Great Britain upholds the international community's efforts by
contributing annually Pound Sterling 150,000 to the UN Fund for Drug Abuse
Control. As mentioned before, the UK also runs a program of assistance to
overseas projects.
    Regarding the drug abuse situation, a review of the government measures
underlines that the government-sponsored policy works toward a closer
international cooperation, enhances the efforts of the law-enforcement
agencies, helps the younger generation realize the impact of drug addiction
and boosts the effort against this evil.
                                                                     Mexico:
    The drug control programs in Mexico differ from those in other
countries as Mexico is a hotbed of manufacture and export of opium, heroin
and marijuana and a major cocaine trafficking transit point to the United
States. Some Mexican states have traditional plantations of opium poppy,
marijuana and Indian hemp. Economic hardships often force the farmers into
dealing with drug dealers and prompt the growing of illegal crops, which
produce profits higher than the earnings from lawful businesses. The anti-
drug programs, therefore, focus on mass destruction of narcotic crops from
the air or manually and the involvement of army units in such operations,
harsh penal sanctions, intensive investigation of drug cartels and
trafficking channels, and dissemination of information among the public.
    Growing cooperation with the USA on the basis of bilateral agreements
and a treaty of juridical assistance is an important element of the anti-
narcotic policy. It facilitates the identification of drug-related money
laundering in the financial and commercial institutions both in Mexico and
the US. The Advance Guard program presupposes operations to detect and
destroy the plantations of drug-bearing crops. Starting from 1986, units of
the Mexican Army and of the US Coastal Guard have been conducting
operations to detain suppliers of drugs in the Mexican territorial waters,
to confiscate their cars and arms, and to control flights in the border
area as part of the American Mexican operation Alliance.
                                                                      Spain:
    The national program against drug abuse in Spain deserves notice as the
Spanish laws permit soft narcotic substances. Despite the expectations and
arguments of the proponents of drug legalization, drug abuse in Spain does
not subside. Neither does the crime rate. The number of violent assaults to
obtain money for drugs is on the rise. The law-enforcement agencies' task
has been set as eradicating drug abuse, opening specialized medical centers
for the addicts who volunteer to undergo treatment, and combating drug
addiction and prostitution as the factors increasing the risk of AIDS
infection.
    The main goals of the Spanish program against drug abuse are to halt
the proliferation of the most heinous drugs like heroin and cocaine,
organize prophylactic measures among the young people of 16-to-18,
promulgate popular knowledge about medicine and treatment of drug addicts
by way of educational lectures, and advance public organizations'
activities.
                                                                     France:
    The French national program against narco-business sponsored by the
Ministry of the Interior and Public Safety focuses on curbing the illegal
trade in drugs, and, in particular, the street vending of narcotic
substances. The document provides for the creation of special-task police
units and a national center to coordinate all police operations against
drug abuse. Narco-business-suppression training courses have been
introduced at police schools. Large police commissariats now have
specialized branches to monitor drug abuse. These branches render practical
and financial assistance to various organizations engaged in fighting
against the abuse of narcotic and toxic chemical substances.
    The experience of foreign anti-narcotics programs can be adapted to the
requirements of the Russian Federation and help work out a feasible
National Program of Comprehensive Counteraction to Narcotics
         Par. 2. Organization of Medical Counteraction to Narcotics
    The primary aspect of the entire anti-narcotics effort is a series of
medical treatment measures. They are carried out by different medical
institutions as actions against narcotics is inalienable from the
activities of public health services of all levels, including the medical
service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. In 1975 the former Soviet
medical authorities detached the addictions treatment service from
psychiatry. Thus the treatment of drug and other addicts became a separate
branch of medicine known as narcology.
    The efforts of the medical institutions make up a significant part of
the anti-narcotics strategy. Their goal is to bring about a decrease in the
demand for drugs. This is achieved by the treatment and rehabilitation of
abusers and, in the final run, is a positive factor of a general
improvement in the drug abuse situation.
    The measures, which the health centers, are obliged to take, can
roughly be divided into two groups. Group One includes the properly medical
efforts in the treatment and rehabilitation of addicts. Group Two embraces
other organizational steps to keep narcotics at bay.
    The international community also pays considerable attention to the
treatment of drug addicts. Article 38 of the Uniform Convention on Drugs
states that the signatory countries will take every possible step to
prevent the misuse of narcotic substances, ensure an early identification
of abusers, treat them, restore them to full working capability, re-
socialize, and monitor them after the completion of treatment (Paragraph
1). The countries will train appropriate personnel (Paragraph 2), and will
inform the population about the hazards of drug abuse (Paragraph 3). The
medical treatment of drug addicts is also presupposed by Resolution II of
the UN conference on implementing the Uniform Convention on Drugs.
Reminding of the provisions of Article 38, the conference stressed that
hospital treatment in a drug-free atmosphere is the most efficacious
medical approach to the issue. It recommended that economically potent
countries where drug abuse is a serious problem provide the opportunities
for such treatment.
                           The Treatment and Rehabilitation of Drug Addicts:
The issues of medical treatment/social rehabilitation of addicts and other
relevant measures are to a greater or lesser degree incorporated in the
public health programs of all nations and have found reflection in certain
regional programs. As a rule, these documents emphasize perfection of the
strategies and organization of drug abuse services on the assumption that
drug abuse is a social disease. The other important aspects are financing
and material/technical support, personnel, informing definite sectors of
society on the hazardous impact of addiction, research in the field of more
effective medicine.
    Experts, however, warn against an overly simplified belief that
containing drug addiction boils down to the availability of medicines and
available hospital beds. The prophylactics of social illnesses like
alcoholism, misuse of narcotics and toxic chemicals cannot be built upon
the same methods as the treatment of serious infectious diseases. Alongside
pharmaceutics, it requires psychological aid and education which more and
more often involves the addicts' families and friends. It is naive to
believe that medicines and injections alone can bring about the desired
results and that the selection of individually suitable pharmaceutical
preparations gives a clue to the problem of treatment. Good results are
yielded by a combination of psychology and pharmacy. Therefore, the
treatment for drug addiction consumes much painstaking effort of a doctor,
psychologist, educator and other specialists working with a person who is
likely to develop the illness or is ill already.
    On the face of it, the issues of treatment and prophylactics
necessitate comprehensive programming and proficient organization. Their
solution lies in the medico-biological, medico-psychological and medico-
social spheres.
    From the standpoint of government policy, public health institutions
have the exclusive authority to treat drug addicts by officially approved
methods, including compulsory treatment of the addicts who pose danger to
society.
    According to the results expected in this field, health centers must
organize and effectuate a series of measures destined to establish firm
grounds for progress in the drug abuse situation.
    In the first place, this means the early identification, diagnosis and
registration of the persons who use drugs for non-medical purposes and
hence stand in need of prophylactic and treatment. However, shortcomings in
the existing methods of express-diagnostics and in the expert check-ups of
drug addicts make establishing the degree and the type of drug dependence
somewhat problematic.
                  Identification, Diagnosis, and Registration of Drug Users:
    The identified addicts may belong to different age and social groups;
their condition may have a different degree of narcotic neglect. This fact
may influence the choice, distribution and intensity of medical measures,
as well as their combination with other types of aid.
    Of particular importance is the early identification of addicts among
the young and the adolescents. A timely medical interference, caring
participation and influence of parents, relatives, teachers, police
officers, and the atmosphere of friendliness can stop the youngsters' slump
into illness.
    When the consumers of different drugs have been identified, it is
exigent to inform the police to enable it to find the sources of drugs and
trafficking channels and execute other preventive measures.
    Information is especially important if the drugs have been manufactured
illegally or their origins are unclear.
    The following list of measures can help identify the individuals who
misuse narcotic substances:
    medical check-ups of industrial labor staffs, school and college
students;
    medical check-ups of inmates in jails and penitentiaries;
    medical examination of the perpetrators of drug abuse for further
registration and treatment, including compulsory treatment;
    specialized testing of certain professionals (the military, pilots,
drivers of all means of transport, police officers) for the bodily presence
of narcotic substances;
    revealing the most dangerous forms of drug abuse that complicated
detoxification, revealing the cases of multiple drug misuse (the combined
use of more than one drug) and the cases of an intertwined abuse of drugs
and alcohol;
    identification of addicts who carry the HIV and other infectious
diseases, elimination of the consequences of infectious transmission;
    timely registration, treatment and rehabilitation of those who need it.
    Another way to improve the health servicing of drug abusers is to
organize:
    fundamental research; development of efficacious pharmaceutical
preparations and novel methods of treatment for different types of narcotic
dependence, their speedy translation into public health practices; large-
scale contribution to research from Russian and foreign scientists (the
Academy of Sciences, medical, pedagogical, psychological and other research
institutions, application of practices adopted abroad);
    accelerated training of highly qualified personnel (addictive
conditions psychiatrists, psychologists, educators, social workers) at
medical colleges and upper level courses, specialized training of medical
attendants, nurses and technicians. The study program should cover not only
the novel methods of treatment, but also the specifics of contacts with the
drug addicts and methods of readiness for treatment and prophylactic
practice;
    organization of new preventive-treatment/ registration clinics, out-
patient departments at industrial facilities and offices, emergency aid
centers and a wide publication of data on their mode of operation,
anonymous and commercial treatment centers for drug addicts;
    extensive adoption by drug-abuse monitoring services of the
achievements in the medical science, psychology, pedagogy, pharmacy, and
special-purpose technology;
    modernization of drug-abuse monitoring services, improvement of
material supplies and provision of the necessary personnel.
    The post-treatment rehabilitation measures should include: a) the
creation of purpose-oriented government-run and charity funds, ex-drug
abusers support funds and diverse forms of work with them; b) development
of rehabilitation methods based on the effective analysis of the existing
rehabilitation procedures and of qualification levels of the personnel; c)
psychological assistance to the former abusers' families, relatives, and
friends who must be taught the techniques of exerting favorable influence
on the patients.
    Equally important is the organization of other anti-narcotics efforts
taken by public health institutions.
    The health of the nation is an important element of the social and
economic development of a country. From this angle, the popularization of a
rational way of life, the cultivation of respect for human health as the
basic value of society ranks high among the priorities of medical
institutions.
                                      Publicizing Information Against Drugs:
    A skillful and persistent dissemination of knowledge about the
destructive impact of drugs and their detriment for the future generations
is a crucial activity of medical institutions in the struggle against
narcotics.
    It is advisable to find a particular audience and do masterly
presentations. Lectures and discussions are not the only means of knowledge
dissemination. Meetings with former drug addicts and presentations about
broken human lives have also proved productive.
    To increase the prophylactic effects of popularization, it would be
useful to train the instructors on the methods and tactics of campaigning
against narcotics, design a system of mass anti-narcotic education, based
on medical science, provide the necessary teaching aids, control and
stimulate this activity.
Organization of Control Over the Use of Narcotic Substances:
    Public health institutions have responsibilities in exercising control
over narcotic substances under international conventions, treaties,
agreements and other forms of international cooperation in combating drug
abuse. As mentioned earlier, their primary responsibility is to control the
proper use of drugs, the correct taking of their stock, their storage,
distribution and removal. The issue of special prominence is the storage of
narcotic substances at medical institutions and warehouses and the
thwarting of attempts to misappropriate them. Inspections often expose
serious flaws in this field.
    To rule out a possible abuse, leakage or misappropriation of drugs, the
following list of measures is essential:
    guarding narcotic substance storage facilities, fitting them out with
new equipment and fire/break-in alarm systems connected to the central
control panel or to the 24-hour operational medical personnel or guards
mail;
    proper protection of the points where drugs are stored in small
quantities for distribution as administered by the physicians;
    tightened control over big-batch long-term storage facilities like the
warehouses of regional drug-store administrations, and strategic reserves
warehouses;
    regular inspections at narcotic drug warehouses;
    strict abidance by the rules of taking stock, storage and use of drugs
for medical purposes;
    a timely exchange of information with the police on the above issues
and cooperation in drawing up the lists of drug storage facilities.
    Experience suggests that a successful solution of the problem depends
on the depth of our insight into it. This is especially true of such a
complex issue as the treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicts
regardless of what stage they are at. That is why the fullest and the most
objective information is essential for the medical and other institutions
to organize a counter-offensive against drug abuse. With that goal in mind,
public health centers should adhere to the following organizational
guidelines:
    gathering and analysis of information on the conditions of drug
addicts, tendencies in and results of their treatment and rehabilitation,
and types and means of using drugs and the impact they have;
    interaction with other institutions and departments in concrete forms
of anti-narcotics activities in such large-scale operations as Poppy and
Doping, in check-ups and research;
    control surveys prepared by the narcology service.
    Organizational support for these guidelines could be achieved through:
    the establishment of a strict procedure for and the terms of turning
in, and registration of documents, supply of dependable information on the
actual situation with drugs and their sales and use for both medical and
non-medical purposes, on the individuals perpetrating misuse, supply of
other data essential for making specific decisions;
    cooperation with other departments in holding joint selective research
and express-tests to obtain reliable information on the actual levels of
drug abuse, the damage it inflicts, the effects of treatment and other
types of aid to the addicts;
    scheduled and unscheduled departmental and/or inter-departmental
inspections of how control over drugs is maintained, and how the rules of
their use and storage are observed;
    analysis and broad publicity of the achievements of medical staffs who
have a record of positive results in combating narcotics, as well as
provision of incentives.
    The scope of health institutions' duties also embraces revealing and
timely informing the relevant departments and the public at large on
dangerous tendencies in drug abuse, new varieties of stupefying substances,
the techniques of their manufacture and the means of use. The public health
system develops the adequate methods of prevention, treatment, and
counteraction.
      Par. 3. Enforcement of Legal Measures of Narcotics Counteraction
    The organization of legal enforcement of anti-narcotics measures falls
into three groups:
    1) application of legal administrative and criminal legal norms
regulating the prevention and suppression of narcotics; 2) government legal
measures to set and refine law enforcement and other agencies combating
narcotics; 3) international anti-narcotics measures.
    Group One includes compulsory treatment of drug addicts and measures
against drug-related crimes. Compulsory treatment of drug addicts is a law-
enforcement measure aimed at cutting down the non-medical use of narcotic
substances. It can be administered by the court to an addict who evades
voluntary treatment or who continues misusing drugs after a course of
treatment. If an addict commits a crime, the court metes out punishment in
combination with compulsory treatment.
    Compulsory treatment of Drug Addicts:
Compulsory treatment is prescribed to all categories of abusers at medical
institutions with a specialized treatment procedure in the course of work
therapy. If criminal punishment is imposed, the treatment is executed at
the penitentiary during the term of imprisonment.
    Placement of drug addicts to mandatory treatment centers is in the
domain of responsibilities of police departments. This activity goes hand
in hand with the following organizational measures:
    identification of individuals perpetrating drugs abuse;
    administering a medical examination, and a compulsory visit to a
medical institution in case of a refusal to undergo the procedure
voluntarily;
    compulsory hospitalization for complete check-up upon conclusion of a
narcologist (psychiatrist specializing in addictive conditions —
translator's note). Notification is given to the prosecutor's office and,
if an underage addict is hospitalized, to his or her parents.
    timely and renewable registration of drug addicts at the drug-patient
monitoring clinics, and prophylactic registration of the individuals whose
misuse of drugs has not yet acquired the form of an illness;
    supervision over the daily way of life of the registered patients and
checking their attempts to skip compulsory treatment, imposition of other
measures of educational, medical and legal influence;
    issuance of documents for placing the addicts who avoid mandatory
treatment to rehabilitation and work-therapy clinics and specialized drug-
abuse Medicare centers; filing documents on treatment of evaders with the
courts;
    escorting of addicts to the places of mandatory treatment, registration
of individuals who were formerly sentenced for drug-related crimes or fell
under administrative liability for misuse of drugs;
    individual prophylactic measures against addicts to whom corrective
labor has been meted out without a term of imprisonment, or whose sentences
have been suspended or deferred;
    treatment of drug addicts at corrective labor institutions
simultaneously with serving a term, supervision over inmates' treatment and
behavior.
        Organizational Law Enforcement Measures against Drug-related Crimes:
    Other organizational law enforcement measures against narcotics-related
crimes are: locating the illegal plantations of narcotic-bearing crops and
identifying their growers, eradicating such plantations, securing
prohibitions to grow narcotic substance containing crops, making special
maps upon the inspections of gardens, private plots of land and wastelands,
cooperating with agriculture experts, army units and other departments
concerned, carrying out special task operations and disseminating
information on drugs.
    It is of paramount importance to reorganize the system of guarding
government-controlled plantations of hemp and the like crops or create such
a system in the places where it is absent. This measure is closely linked
to the development of advanced methods of crop guarding, especially, in
harvesting seasons. Work by shifts and material incentives may prove
effective. Good results can also be obtained through the improvement of
technical and chemical means of protection.
    To limit the access of the public at large to the areas of government-
sponsored drug- bearing crop plantations, it would stand to reason to
establish special passport and traffic control in such areas.
                          Organization of Measures to Suppress Drug-dealing:
    The measures to suppress drug dealing are the most important issue at
present. Manufacture and trade in narcotics has become a branch of the
shadow economy. It is gaining momentum, creating production facilities and
channels of distribution. In a large number of cases the understaffed law
enforcement departments are unable to rebuff the onslaught of drug
manufacturers and offer sound alternatives to all aspects of drug abuse.
    The illegal production of drugs that spill over the state borders and
continents is at the top of the world community's agenda. Particular
significance is attached to the clandestine drug laboratories.
    In the wake of it, it is exigent to set up specialized police
departments, which will concentrate the officers of high professional
expertise, and to provide them with the necessary material and technical
support.
    Foreign experts believe tangible results in eradicating clandestine
laboratories can be achieved if police operations to uncover the channels
by which the raw materials arrive and the end product is dispatched are
synchronized with the efforts to block access to chemical substances and
equipment the manufacture of drugs requires. This, however, is not easy as
some drug synthesis components such as acetic anhydride, ether, benzene,
acetone are extensively used in the industrial sector. Their industrial
consumption is not controlled in practical terms since, in most countries,
legislation does not regulate the production, storage and use of these
chemicals.
    Experts in Germany propose in this connection that the laws against
drugs should extend to cover these chemicals too. But the output and
industrial use of the above substances is so massive that the attempts to
take them under control within the boundaries of a single country have
yielded no results while entailing substantial expenditure on organizing
the control service.
    Another measure suggested is marking the packing of chemical substances
with special marks that would help the police identify the country of
origin and the manufacturer. Such a step, however, is unproductive as in
most cases the police does not get a hold of packing of the chemicals which
had already been used.
    Experts consider as more promising the special laboratory tests of the
confiscated narcotic substances and chemicals used in the manufacture of
drugs. The tests can be more helpful in identifying the country of origin,
elucidating specific features of the technological process and other
fundamental properties of the chemicals.
    For instance, specialists of the German institute of criminology have
designed on the basis of the American and Swedish experience methods of
identifying the places of origin of heroin through chromatographic testing.
    Experts believe the most effective way to control the proliferation of
the substances used in drug manufacturing could be the marking of such
substances with dyes or radiation. The weak point of the method is a
possible impact the marking may have on the qualities of the chemicals and
the end products. Besides, it would contradict the legislation of many
countries and some international agreements. That is why the researchers of
anti-narcotic methods tend to pin hopes on the method of a different nature
— self-control. It encompasses a set of police-proposed measures that are
effectuated by the services directly involved in actions against illegal
manufacturing, trafficking and trade in drugs, as well as by all companies
and individuals who have a connection with the manufacturing, sales and use
of narcotics and auxiliary chemicals. According to this concept, the
producers, suppliers and consumers of chemicals report to the police all
suspicious purchases. The police, in its turn, work out detailed
recommendation and criteria for such cases. Examples of these criteria are
above-the- statistic-average size of a purchased batch of chemicals, a
request from a new client, etc. Such kind of reporting gives the police
more opportunities to locate illegal laboratories, channels of raw
materials supplies and dispatch of the end product.
    An imperative condition for putting in effect practical anti-narcotics
measures is stringent control over the narcotic raw materials and their
storage and limitations on trade in them.
    It is important to note those drug-dealing affects the legitimate
turnover of narcotic substances. Violations of the rules of their storage,
manufacturing, and accounting continue increasing. There are
misappropriations and other offenses, including attacks on warehouses of
narcotic preparations in health centers, drug stores, etc. Executives do
not take adequate measures to safeguard narcotic substances and sometime
become accomplices in crimes. A possible explanation for this state of
affairs is the breach of the rules outlined above.
    It is important to reveal violations of the effective rules of
manufacturing, storage, accounting, and sales of narcotic preparations,
invoking criminal liability when necessary. This necessitates joint steps
by the anti-drug units, licensing system of the internal affairs ministry,
fire detachments and units of extra-departmental guards.
    The perpetrators of drug-related crimes' utmost secrecy calls for the
improvement in the procedures of investigation in strict compliance with
the criminal law procedures.
                                Crime Investigation Organizational Measures:
    An important element in this process is the interaction between
detectives and investigators. The best and well-tested form of this
interaction is the setting-up of temporary or, as need be, permanently
functioning inquiry/investigation groups. These groups focus the efforts of
all branches of the police on drug-related crimes. The main directions of
activities (with due regard to the limits of professional competence of
each member of the group) are:
    a) gathering and systematic analysis of all the incoming and requested
information on drug-related crimes and malefactors;
    b) identification of criminal groupings and measures toward halting
their activities;
    c) police actions to prevent and halt misappropriations of drugs and
other offenses in medicare institutions and other organizations;
    d) police actions taken simultaneously with the investigation as
envisaged by the criminal law court procedure;
    e) quality emergency investigation, completeness, objectivity and
timeliness of inquiry and investigation;
    f) tactical planning and expedient conduct of search and technical
operations; professional conduct of operations; employment of investigation
and other technologies to supply the investigators with testimonies and eye-
witness accounts of the offenders' guilt;
    g) professional analysis of the ways of using the results of search and
technical operations in investigation procedures.
          Par. 4. Other Organizational Measures to Combat Narcotics
    Narcotics can be overcome only if approaches to anti-narcotics activity
are fundamentally revised, its concrete trends are mapped out and the
control over the end results achieved by each ministry and department,
responsible for curbing this social evil.
    Up-to-date scales and forms of narcotics proliferation show that the
measures, applied within the framework of established structures, are not
particularly successful. There is no proper interaction between the
ministries and the departments, called upon to handle these matters; work
is carried out far too often formally without essential drive, consistence,
and organization; the system of preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative
help remains inadequate; and anti-narcotic campaign is ineffective.
    For this reason, organizational medical and law enforcement steps can
and must be backed by measures to resist drug abuse in all spheres and at
all levels of state power to avoid their imbalance and flaws in the all-out
anti-narcotics crusade.
    The practical experience of daily anti-narcotics activity calls for a
significant impact from the top government agencies.
    It is at this level that measures should be adopted for creating and
implementing a single national strategy against narcotics. For this end, a
single permanent executive body, empowered to control narcotics and capable
of coordinating comprehensive actions daily against drug addiction and drug-
related crimes must be created. The formation of such a body, representing
all the ministries and departments concerned, will make it possible to
organize a prompt and permanent government action against narcotics,
coordinate efforts of government agencies, and other organizations, as well
as individuals, and maintain contact with international organizations.
                                                         Lawmaking measures:
    It is important to revitalize government-sponsored efforts toward
hammering out a single anti-narcotics legislation, matching international
standards, including 1) a law on the `control over the legal distribution
of narcotics, strong substances, precursors, and 2) on the responsibility
for such offences as: drugs extortion; illegal actions with government-
owned chemicals and special equipment and their use to make drugs; 3)
organizational forms of perpetrating drug-related crimes; 4) various
commercial and financial operations on money laundering.
    Due to the latter, it is necessary to give law enforcement agencies
more authority to get from banks and other institutions and organizations
necessary data on accounts and other financial transactions of persons,
suspected of unlawful actions with narcotics.
    Besides, it appears reasonable to amend the current legislation by
expanding authority and creating appropriate conditions for law-enforcement
agencies (police) to a) conduct searches of luggage, including carry-on
luggage, of passengers at all kinds of transport facilities, b) check
controlled shipments and cargoes, c) check state purchases of drugs, d)
conduct medical examinations of citizens, e) set a more flexible procedure
of placing drug addicts for medical treatment, f) a more flexible system of
administrative detaining and arresting of citizens, and g) to practice more
extensively the protocol form of pre-trial materials preparation.
                                Organizational Measures at Government Level:
    It would be expedient to carry out a number of organizational anti-
narcotics measures at government level. They include:
    — creating a stable system of information for regional law-enforcement
agencies about treaties, agreements, and protocols, concluded and signed by
countries, governments, and departments, about procedures and requirements
of signing such documents, about Interpol National Central Bank's
opportunities to combat specific types of crimes, and about requests'
formulation requirements;
    — putting the NCB on round-the-clock duty to meet local requests;
    — speeding up the creation of effective border customs control and
adopting measures against the use of a country as a transit point to ship
drugs to other regions;
    — toughening control over the production and supplies of drug-bearing
substances in chemical pharmacology and other areas, where they are used
for lawful purposes.
    A positive solution should be found to the issue of opening more
medical centers, improving anti-drug addiction therapy, and manufacturing
and acquiring more effective medicines, which involves much government
spending and a search for sources of funding. Simultaneously, special
government-financed short and long term comprehensive medical programs
should be worked out and put into effect to block the consumption and sale
of drugs; really re-socialize drug addicts; stop AIDS from spreading; spare
no effort toward revitalizing non-governmental organizations' activity,
aimed at reducing the demand for narcotics.
                                                Measures to Train Personnel:
    One should bear in mind that in most cases, the first contact with drug
addicts, that is with seriously ill people, is made by the officers of law
enforcement (police) agencies who have neither practical nor psychological
skills of dealing with ill persons. But even a physician is required
alongside professional knowledge, to display ethical norms, which quite
often are crucial for the recovery of mentally imbalanced patients. For
this reason, it is especially urgent and important to draw up teaching
aides and methodological recommendations for law- enforcement agencies, not
only on the tactics but also on the ethics of dealing with drug addicts,
especially young ones. It is necessary to put the experience, gained by the
police in anti-drug addiction prophylactic actions, into practice as soon
as possible.
    Polish scientists identify three groups of young drug addicts: 1) those
who can but do not want to stop using drugs; 2) those who would like to
give up drugs but cannot do so on their own; 3) and those who do not want
and can not drop the ruinous dependence.
    The principles of treating representatives of each of these groups
differ considerably. The experience of drug addicts' treatment shows that
two opposite trends dominate in the systems accepted up to date. The first
prefers tolerance, partnership, and medical treatment, excluding coercion
and punishment. The second envisages tough regimentation toward drug
addicts. However, there is one requirement that is common for both systems
— indispensable compliance with the principle of voluntary consent.
    There are several varieties of pedagogics as industrial, military,
agricultural, and medical. The latter, also called orthopedagogics, deals
with upbringing children with defects. In the field of criminological
prophylaxis, essential is the role of resocialization, i.e. of the
educational effect on persons, poorly adapted to life in society. According
to the criminological literature, «the basic goal in penitentiaries, is to
create conditions for the social adaptation of persons after their prison
term is over.» All these sources of knowledge should be made instrumental
in combating drug abuse.
    At the government level, interdepartmental programs involving a wide
range of experts and the media should be worked out and implemented on
educational and prophylactic campaign among the population.
    Foreign Experience in Prophylactics:
Foreign experience deserves attention in this respect. Poland, for one,
attaches great significance to public anti-drug addiction campaigns.
Specialists are convinced that drug abuse should be addressed by the public
organizations and individuals, among them — well known scientists, artists,
writers, and clerics.
    The catholic church plays a special role. Maximilian Conbeg's Society
has all parishes offered to its program of temperance, urging them to
abstain not only from drugs but also from all unnatural desires. The
program has been backed across the board. Each diocese has priests
specially trained to render professional aid to drug addicts and to help
them return to society.
    The Catholic University offers a course of lectures, which are to help
drug addicts; the newly organized Drug Prevention Society has basic
activities coinciding with that of the government and its main tasks are to
treat drug addicts, return them to society and prevent drug-related crimes.
The Society provides therapy for drug afflicted persons, and
recommendations on how to regain the healthy way of life. The Polish
Psychiatrists' Society has an anti-drug addiction commission, pursuing
mainly scientific objectives.
    The Monar youth movement immensely contributes to the anti-drug
campaign sparing no effort to return drug addicts to society by interacting
with medics. Religious and public organizations are actively involved in
anti-narcotics campaigns in other countries, too.
    At the same time, it is only within the framework of a government-
sponsored program that all issues, pertaining to the destruction of drug-
bearing crops, must be addressed. For that it is necessary to create
independent agencies, furnished with advanced equipment, aircraft, motor
vehicles and other means. Such agencies can be allowed appropriate
functions only after clearance by a team of ecological experts. Here in,
strict criminal responsibility must be enforced for carrying out such
actions that destroy the environment and harm flora and fauna. There must
be compensation.
    The solution of this issue depends upon the possibility of deploying
the armed forces. In the USA the army plays a key role in monitoring drug
trafficking routes. The Defense Department carries out the following
measures against criminal narco-business:
    — searching for drug-bearing crops, secret laboratories, storages and
drug distribution points;
    — discovering and destroying sources of producing drugs (cocaine,
marijuana, etc);
    — putting under control all possible routes of smuggling drugs into the
country (by sea, by air, across land border);
    — assisting state law-enforcement agencies in exposing the channels of
drug proliferation by using intelligence sensors and photo equipment in
border territories;
    — coordinating operations to intercept ships and aircraft, suspected of
illegal drugs shipment;
    — patrolling the coast by interceptor planes, ships, posting radars,
balloon systems to monitor low-flying objects, etc.;
    — measures to get enlisted and non-enlisted army personnel cut drugs
consumption.
    In 1990, the military, using search equipment, capable of locating
submerged cables and pipelines, discovered an underground tunnel at the
border with Mexico, a tunnel through which huge consignments of drugs were
smuggled into the USA. In the last few years, four anti-narcotics
techniques have been in focus: computerized systems, advanced means of
communication, field laboratory analyzers, remote chemical detectors (photo-
acoustic and laser spectroscopes for locating specific drug production
sites.) Experts regard as promising instruments for checking baggage and
cargo containers. These instruments operate on nonlinear radar principles.
                                      Organization of Comprehensive Studies:
    By combining the efforts of scientists and experts it would be possible
to avoid haste with setting up new creative teams and, instead, apply to
the database for information, learn its source and its author, and decide
whether it's simpler to use it rather than carry out studies anew. Such an
approach would be quite beneficial for those whose work has so far been
wasted and for those who urgently need scientific information.
    This would also speed up the process of solving a number of drug
problems by cutting the time for scientific research and decreasing
inevitable material costs.
                  Functions of the Head Branch of the Anti-narcotics Agency:
    Changes in the given situation call for an appropriate effective
response, a revision of the content and volume of work, correction of
functions carried out at the departmental level.
    Particularly responsible is the role of the head branch of the agency
integrated in the Ministry of Internal Affairs which studies, analyzes,
sums up and monitors information on narcotics in the country, informs
appropriate institutions and departments about it, sets priorities in
actions against narcotics, adopts measures to attain them, and carries out
other managerial functions. This agency also arranges and takes part in
concrete anti-narcotics campaigns. These include measures to prevent the
illegal growth of drug-bearing crops (plan, organize, and carry out POPPY
operations, etc.); to curb theft of drugs and highly effective medicinal
substances; discover underground laboratories (develop, plan and carry out
Doping operations); uncover the most sophisticated crimes (by taking direct
part in investigative and search actions upon arrival on site, providing
methodological, informational and technical aid); expose persons and
criminal gangs with inter-regional and international narco-business links;
join other services in carrying out preventive operations at airports,
railway stations, customs offices to detain criminals, check the baggage,
eliminate drug trafficking channels; upgrade work toward preventing and
exposing drug-related crimes.
    The volume of applicable law measures at this level bears a selective
nature, being many inferiors to the volume of managerial and other
functions. It would be more rational and effective however to rid these
branches completely of any forms of direct involvement in preventing,
exposing, and curbing crimes and thereby extend managerial functions by
raising demands for professional leadership and service management by
augmenting the staff functions of these branches and limiting their role in
exposing and curbing crimes to appropriate qualified essential methods and
effective control.
                                  Perfecting Internal Affairs Ministry Work:
    To make law-enforcement agencies anti-drug trafficking activity more
efficient, the Internal Affairs Ministry could:
    — draft comprehensive anti-drug addiction programs;
    — perfect the departmental normative basis, create methods and analysis
teaching aids and video-films;
    — participate in the work to bring republican anti-narcotics
legislation in line with the international acts;
    — create a normative-legal basis to ensure a mechanism for bilateral
and multilateral international cooperation;
    — work out, create, and introduce in day-to-day activity a mechanism of
control over the emerging narcotic situation and coordinate reaction to its
changes;
    — adopt measures to provide the branches with appropriate equipment and
special devices;
    — create automated information-search systems with wide-ranging
possibilities to combat criminal narco-business;
    — set out short and long term guidelines;
    — determine resources for the target-oriented organizational,
informative, promptly investigative and material-technical support of areas
with widespread drug abuse and rampant crime;
    — control the formation of local branches and their activities;
    — organize interaction between law-enforcement (police) agencies,
serving at areas where drugs are grown, trafficked, and consumed;
    — coordinate various branches' activity to carry out joint measures
toward exposing criminal gangs with inter-regional contacts and carrying
out prophylactic measures on air, sea, river, and auto transport;
    — form computer data banks on drug trafficking at republican and
international levels;
    — follow the USA and other countries' experience in setting up special
mobile units, armed with the most advanced military hardware and teach
methods and ecologically safe technologies of drug crops' destruction;
    — promote law-enforcement (police) agencies' cooperation with customs,
national security agencies, army and border troops;
    — educate territorial agencies on various methods of work;
    — plan cooperation with foreign agencies in preventing drugs and raw
material for narcotics from being smuggled in from other regions practicing
a specific form of controllable supplies envisaged by the 1988 UN
Convention and exert control over such cooperation;
    — organize and control scientific research and apply it;
    — to study, sum up, and apply positive foreign experience;
    One should bear in mind that the campaign against narcotics is part of
the universal action against organized crime. Efficiency at the local level
makes it possible to expose not only drug-related crimes but also felonies,
especially those involving violence and theft.
    If all these organizational measures are put into practice, the
campaign against narcotics in the Russian Federation will be more
effective.
                                 Conclusion
    The international community sees narcotics as one of the most dangerous
social evils. International legal acts, as well as national legislations,
including that of the Russian Federation, contain numerous norms regulating
actions against narcotics bound to suppress and prevent it. Moves are made
to perfect and update these norms so that they could counteract new forms
and methods of committing drug-related crimes. Naturally enough, legal
regulations trail after criminal thought in these and other criminal
offenses.
    To narrow the gap between the rapid advancement of criminal know-how
and the introduction of the new anti-crime legislation there is a need to
monitor the spread of narcotics, assess it, watch its dynamics, forecast
its progress and carry out appropriate research. Monitoring and research
are to help pinpoint the sensitive spots of drug abuse and work out new
legal norms and methods for dealing with them.
    Highly important are the application of legal norms and the planning of
various measures aiming to oppose narcotics.
    Private business has been made legal in the new social and economic
conditions. Under the guise of legally established private enterprises
underground drug manufacturing laboratories and drug trade hideouts
(houses, apartments) have begun functioning as unofficial operational
reports confirm. Illegal efforts to produce and sell drugs and the tendency
for their proliferation demand emergency antidrug legislation. Illegally-
operating drug-producing and drug-selling companies present a much bigger
threat to society than all other drug-related ventures do, now that they
(a) spread new varieties of and increasingly more hazardous drugs, (b)
increase, drug production and sales manifold, (c) promote an organized
system of narcobusiness and, consequently, the takeover of drug-trafficking
by organized criminal groups, (d) take monopoly control of drug-trafficking
and reap super-profits in this field, (e) take drug-trafficking operations
beyond the national borders and make use of their foreign connections for
the acquisition, manufacture, transportation, sending, smuggling and sale
of drugs. Their activities prompt many related crimes.
    All this calls for moves to update the Russian Criminal Code with
articles on legal responsibility for the production and sale of drugs which
must be considered to belong to the categories of serious and most serious
criminal offenses punishable by ten to fifteen years of imprisonment and
the confiscation of property.
    The climatic conditions on the territory of Russian Federation favor
the natural growth and cultivation of drug-bearing plants, which may be, or
are already, used for the purpose of drug production. This calls for the
need to constantly perfect methods of exposing and destroying such plants,
both those that are wild and those that are raised, which, in turn, calls
for a wide range of financial and organizational efforts.
    Its geographic and geopolitical position makes the Russian Federation a
convenient trans-shipment point on the road from Asia to other former
Soviet republics and on to Europe. The Russian government, its law-
enforcement agencies, in particular, must, as a result, check illegal
attempts to take drugs across the national border, bolster up its customs
services and see to it that they upgrade their performance and work in
close cooperation with the territorial and traffic police and other
agencies expected to carry out programs of action against narcotics.
    The newly gained independence requires that the Russian Federation
confront two problems directly related to narcotics and efforts to overcome
it.
    First of all, borders between Russia and other former Soviet republics
show the highest degree of transparency, i.e. border-crossing presents
almost no problem. Given the geographic and geopolitical position of
Russia, the transparency of the national border aggravates the problem of
drug smuggling and calls for the need to essentially fortify the border and
better customs control along it.
    Secondly, there is the problem of international relations in the field
of narcotics and international efforts to deal with it. There are two
angles to this second problem. Now that it has gained sovereignty, Russia
has to assume upon itself the functions of establishing and maintaining
international relations, especially since it represents a sort of a link in
the chain that ties drug- producers and drug-consuming regions together.
    The second angle of this problem lies in the fact that once being a
part of the Soviet Union, Russian Federation neither faced nor could
possibly face obstacles concerning the jurisdiction of its anti-crime
effort, including crimes committed on territories of different Soviet
republics. Now that they are sovereign nations, the former Soviet republics
have national borders, which, transparent as they are, make legal action
against criminal elements possible only in the context of international
relations and in keeping with international agreements. This, naturally,
complicates the timely launching of operational and investigative actions
aimed at solving criminal cases including those of drug-trafficking.